Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hello New Job! Найти работу в современных реалиях

Channel

Hello New Job! Найти работу в современных реалиях

@hellonewjob

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

13,845subscribers

+117 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001835438585
TypeChannel
Username@hellonewjob
DescriptionКанал про поиск работы и трудоустройство: инструкции, советы, полезные практики. А также Hello New Job! — это курс Киры Кузьменко, который учит системному поиску работы. Узнать больше: https://hellonewjob.org
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live29 August 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 29 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hellonewjob

Growth

13,72813,84513,786.56 August 2026 — 13,728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,728 subscribers6 August 2026 — 13,735 subscribers7 August 2026 — 13,731 subscribers8 August 2026 — 13,737 subscribers9 August 2026 — 13,733 subscribers10 August 2026 — 13,740 subscribers11 August 2026 — 13,736 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13,740 subscribers13 August 2026 — 13,743 subscribers15 August 2026 — 13,748 subscribers16 August 2026 — 13,743 subscribers17 August 2026 — 13,740 subscribers18 August 2026 — 13,745 subscribers19 August 2026 — 13,747 subscribers20 August 2026 — 13,743 subscribers21 August 2026 — 13,742 subscribers24 August 2026 — 13,750 subscribers25 August 2026 — 13,752 subscribers26 August 2026 — 13,748 subscribers27 August 2026 — 13,818 subscribers28 August 2026 — 13,835 subscribers29 August 2026 — 13,845 subscribers6 August 202629 August 2026
23 measurements spanning 24 days, net +117. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,710–13,863 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
29 Aug 2026, 19:1413,845+10
28 Aug 2026, 19:0713,835+17
27 Aug 2026, 20:3613,818+70
26 Aug 2026, 23:1213,748-4
25 Aug 2026, 22:5513,752+2
24 Aug 2026, 21:1313,750+8
21 Aug 2026, 23:4513,742-1
20 Aug 2026, 15:0213,743-4
19 Aug 2026, 18:0513,747+2
18 Aug 2026, 20:0713,745+5
17 Aug 2026, 21:4313,740-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:4813,743-5
15 Aug 2026, 04:2813,748+5
13 Aug 2026, 18:0713,743+3
12 Aug 2026, 14:0413,740+4
11 Aug 2026, 13:1213,736-4
10 Aug 2026, 15:2113,740+7
9 Aug 2026, 12:5213,733-4
8 Aug 2026, 14:4613,737+6
7 Aug 2026, 17:1513,731first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 45 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.4%
avg views ÷ 13,845 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,440
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.41%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 23 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held23 (27 July 202628 August 2026)
Views total27,280
Reactions total385
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,540
Videos
140
Links
720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

423 reactions across 21 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
15135.7%
🔥7818.4%
👍6715.8%
😁378.75%
❤‍🔥225.20%
🤣214.96%
🦄194.49%
🍾61.42%
💯51.18%
🙏51.18%
🤩40.946%
😍30.709%
🏆20.473%
🫡20.473%
🥴10.236%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 461reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC760 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Почти каждый кандидат хочет примерно одного и того же. Чтобы работа нашла его сама, как раньше. Чтобы рекрутер написал первым. 👀 Хорошая новость: это всё ещё возможно, даже на таком сложном рынке, как сейчас! Но это работает не совсем так, как мы привыкли. Сейчас любая вакансия завалена сотнями откликов, и их разбор не всегда приводит к закрытию вакансии. Рекрутеры снова ищут кандидатов руками, прямым поиском и ис

7🔥4👍1💯1

26 Aug 2026, 12:21 UTC≈1,350 views23 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁12🤣6🔥32

26 Aug 2026, 12:20 UTC≈1,240 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🎯 6 способов попасть на собес В этом посте мы обсудили отклики и причину, по которой они часто остаются без ответа. Сегодня пойдём дальше и обсудим, как всё-таки попасть на собес, когда привычные отклики на публичные вакансии не работают, как раньше. Слово «отклик» каждый понимает по-своему: для одного это нажать кнопку на hh, для другого — написать напрямую нанимающему в личку, для третьего — попросить знакомого

👍116❤‍🔥1🔥1

25 Aug 2026, 10:58 UTC≈1,140 views21 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

⭐️ Открыт набор в XI поток Hello New Job! В 23-м году была одна сложность поиска работы — в 26-м году она усугубилась, и довольно серьезно. Компании экономят и нанимают осторожнее, конкуренция растёт, ИИ меняет правила игры с обеих сторон: ты можешь использовать его для поиска, но и оценивать тебя тоже будут с его помощью. Рынок изменился (и продолжает меняться), и правила поиска работы — тоже. Меняется то, каким д

🔥97👍3🦄2

24 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,130 views12 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Video

✨ Hello New Job! Как это было для тебя Недавно мы завершили уже X (!) поток Hello New Job! Этот пост — собирает отзывы выпускников 👇 Дорогой выпускник! Мы очень ценим твоё мнение и просим поделиться в комментариях, как наш курс помог тебе в поиске работы. От потока к потоку мы стараемся улучшать курс, делать его все более продуманным, эффективным, а участие в нём — удобным. И твой отзыв нам в этом очень поможет.

🍾64❤‍🔥1🤩1

24 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC≈1,150 views17 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

💊 6 карьерных витаминок, которые слушают чаще всего В ближайшие дни мы откроем набор в XI поток Hello New Job! Пока ты ждёшь — послушай подборку витаминок Киры, которые набрали больше всего прослушиваний за всё время существования подкаста. Три свежих выпуска 2026 года, которые побили рекорды 👇 🎤 Формула рынка труда 2026 Почему не стоит менять работу только ради денег и что делать тем, кто ищет работу прямо сейча

8🔥4🦄3❤‍🔥1👍1

21 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,490 views36 reactionsread 30 August 2026

Posted without readable text

😁17🤣153🔥1

20 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC≈1,590 views17 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🔥 2 новости для тех, кто интересовался курсом Hello New Job! и планирует присоединиться к XI потоку в октябре 1️⃣ Если ты оставлял(а) свою почту на предзапись XI потока — на почте тебя уже ждёт письмо о старте набора в поток. Если ты точно записывался(лась), но письма нет, пожалуйста, попробуй: — поискать по слову «hellonewjob» в почтовом ящике — проверить папку «Спам» 🔨 Если вышеописанные шаги не помогли — напиш

7🔥4🦄4👍2

19 Aug 2026, 10:43 UTC≈1,520 views13 reactionsread 30 August 2026
File

А чтобы было понятнее, какой тип кейсов может привести к отзыву оффера — слушай новую Карьерную витаминку. В ней Кира рассказала про реальную ситуацию, когда человек в начале переговоров сделал всё в целом нормально, но потом передавил. 🎤 Слушай кейс прямо здесь или на любимых подкаст-платформах На курсе Hello New Job! ты подготовишься к переговорам на этапе оффера и отработаешь этот навык на практике. Ты поймёшь,

5👍4🔥2🦄1🙏1

19 Aug 2026, 10:42 UTC≈1,460 views19 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷🩷 Можно ли торговаться на этапе оффера или нет? Короткий ответ: да! Но не торговаться, а обсуждать условия. Иначе велик риск, что оффер могут отозвать. Рынок сейчас работодательский, офферами не разбрасываются и рисковать единственным предложением не хочется. Тем не менее, обсуждать условия в сторону улучшения нужно, главное делать это грамотно и думать в том числе о пользе для работодателя. На курсе Hello N

👍76🦄3🔥2❤‍🔥1

17 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC≈1,650 views31 reactionsread 30 August 2026
Photo

Почему на твои отклики не отвечают? В последнее время мы много говорили про то, как изменился подход к резюме, перейдём к следующему этапу — обсудим отклики. Чтобы показать, что происходит, Кира Кузьменко провела эксперимент. Она разместила на hh вакансию middle Frontend-разработчика. Условия — максимально привлекательные (удалёнка, никаких жёстких ограничений), но бренд — намеренно ноунейм, невнятный IT-аутсорс. Т

16👍6🔥4❤‍🔥3🥴1😁1

14 Aug 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,690 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Искать работу — вообще-то дело одинокое. С родителями это не обсудишь, друзьям быстро надоедает, коллегам знать не надо. К счастью, на курсе Hello New Job! у нас из потока в поток складывается классное коммьюнити, в котором можно найти партнера для мок-интервью, запросить реферал, показать свежеиспечённый пост в линке и попросить его полайкать, поделиться радостной новостью или просто поныть. Атмосферу в коммьюнити

11🦄3🔥2💯1😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hellonewjob. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hellonewjob edited 6 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
27 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,286 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 23 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AgileFluent: карьера без границ
@agilefluent · 44,755
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
Job in IT&Digital
@geekjobs · 49,863
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 25 August 2026
Relocate - зарубежные вакансии на релокацию и удаленку
@young_relocate · 51,046
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
Remocate: релокация, удалёнка, работа и вакансии
@evacuatejobs · 134,866
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 13 August 2026
Connectable Jobs
@zarubezhom_jobs · 101,327
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 15 August 2026
Job for Junior
@jobforjunior · 83,854
Telegram ranks this channel #89 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 18 August 2026
Job for Products and Projects
@forproducts · 68,857
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026

This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 29 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hello New Job! Найти работу в современных реалиях” (@hellonewjob), 13,845 subscribers as measured 29 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hellonewjob.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.