✔️最新版本win11系统1.9.8-64版本 ✔️升级了一些群发插件 ✔️修复了ws的翻译 转发消息无法发送 群发插件,和计数器 无法正常翻译.翻译延迟.等一系列情况 重新下载最新版本安装一下哈 helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)

Channel
helloworld 官方客服中心 海外社交软件PC端, 移动端自动翻译多开群发helloworold_kaifa
@helloworld_keifa
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
11,477subscribers
-5,354 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003585170672 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helloworld_keifa |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 17 January 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helloworld_keifa |
Topic
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 39% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 18:21 | 11,477 | -246 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 11,723 | -171 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 11,894 | -224 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 02:38 | 12,118 | -485 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 01:55 | 12,603 | -649 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 06:16 | 13,252 | -650 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 01:41 | 13,902 | -413 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 08:33 | 14,315 | -211 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:43 | 14,526 | -223 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:36 | 14,749 | -198 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 14,947 | -210 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 05:19 | 15,157 | -159 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 15,316 | -182 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 15,498 | -136 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 15,634 | -36 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:53 | 15,670 | -62 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:36 | 15,732 | -48 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 21:04 | 15,780 | -100 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 03:18 | 15,880 | -87 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 15,967 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 17 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 17m 52s
- Average length
- 2m 33s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 January 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
✔️独立版本已更新 ✔️翻译群发多开 中文独立版本 ✔️客服咨询:helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)
✔️添加工单操作 ✔️翻译基础使用 客服咨询:helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)
开工单,上工单,分享工单,删除工单
子账号开通流程。
当前HelloWorld集成了WhatsApp,Telegram,Line,Zalo国外主流聊天软件、高效功能、专业翻译 助力客户实现全球轻松连接
✔️新版本win11-1.9.6-x64 ✔️客服咨询:helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)
✔️新版本win11-1.9.5-33 ✔️客服咨询:helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)
✔️独立版本已更新 ✔️翻译群发多开 中文独立版本 ✔️客服咨询:helloworld官方客服(24小时在线)
开工单,上工单,分享工单,删除工单
子账号开通流程。
当前HelloWorld集成了WhatsApp,Telegram,Line,Zalo国外主流聊天软件、高效功能、专业翻译 助力客户实现全球轻松连接
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @helloworld_keifa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@dajian8818 · 8251 post【韩国素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|hanguo renshe taotu
@hanguosucai_2k · 141 post【美国素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|meiguo renshe taotu
@meiguosucai_5k · 241 post缅北 黑料 吃瓜(曝光)
@mianbeiyk · 191 post【日本素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|riben renshe taotu
@ribensucai_3k · 231 post【台湾素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|taiwan renshe taotu
@taiwansucai_4k · 221 post【新加坡素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|xinjiapo renshe taotu
@xinjiaposucai_8k · 131 post【印度素材】印度尼西亚素材|狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|yindu renshe taotu
@yindusucai_7k · 131 post【英国素材】狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|yingguo renshe taotu
@yingguosucai_6k · 131 post【中国素材】国内素材|狗推素材|旅游|生活|美食|风景|购物|高清大图|zhongguo renshe taotu
@zhongguosucai_1k · 431 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“helloworld 官方客服中心 海外社交软件PC端, 移动端自动翻译多开群发helloworold_kaifa” (@helloworld_keifa), 11,477 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helloworld_keifa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.