Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for prod.hxllo

Channel

prod.hxllo

@helloxfilfak

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

68subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001990661180
TypeChannel
Username@helloxfilfak
CreatedBetween 1 October 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/helloxfilfak

Growth

6870698 August 2026 — 70 subscribers10 August 2026 — 70 subscribers24 August 2026 — 69 subscribers31 August 2026 — 68 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 68–70 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 17:3568-1
24 Aug 2026, 22:1969-1
10 Aug 2026, 00:0170no change
8 Aug 2026, 19:0270first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
28s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 25.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5193153611676276728125.0%
custom 5282812784852107537125.0%
custom 5413694787846947325125.0%
custom 5449364817657735717125.0%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC14 viewsread 10 August 2026

бля я знаю это олег монгол виноват

Signed wheezy

9 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC12 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @cbpubVideo

В войне всегда страдают невинные

Signed wheezy

9 Aug 2026, 17:58 UTC19 viewsread 10 August 2026

кому-то сяоми хуевый за сотку зашел

Signed wheezy

9 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

но бля там даже отзыв есть

Signed wheezy

9 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026

не я понимаю не туда лезу и тд

Signed wheezy

9 Aug 2026, 17:56 UTC17 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed wheezy

7 Aug 2026, 18:12 UTC23 viewsread 10 August 2026

пиздец они гиганские после se

Signed wheezy

7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC24 viewsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

Signed wheezy

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @helloxfilfak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“prod.hxllo” (@helloxfilfak), 68 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helloxfilfak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.