Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПЕРЕЕЕЗД⋆✴︎˚. sᴋᴇᴛᴄʜᴇs ᴏꜰ ᴀ ʙʟᴇʏᴢᴇʀ

Channel

ПЕРЕЕЕЗД⋆✴︎˚. sᴋᴇᴛᴄʜᴇs ᴏꜰ ᴀ ʙʟᴇʏᴢᴇʀ

@helpsBleyzer

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

272subscribers

-52 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002965310607
TypeChannel
Username@helpsBleyzer
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/helpsBleyzer

Growth

27232429811 August 2026 — 324 subscribers11 August 2026 — 324 subscribers18 August 2026 — 306 subscribers25 August 2026 — 287 subscribers1 September 2026 — 279 subscribers11 September 2026 — 272 subscribers11 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 31 days, net -52. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 264–332 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:58272-7
1 Sept 2026, 17:17279-8
25 Aug 2026, 16:02287-19
18 Aug 2026, 01:42306-18
11 Aug 2026, 14:51324no change
11 Aug 2026, 13:17324first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

161 reactions across 10 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53551051718672076495232.3%
custom 53686675876662821434326.7%
custom 53797243496096432932414.9%
148.70%
custom 5229196771065896777138.07%
🕊84.97%
👻53.11%
custom 525614950332448992421.24%

Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 161 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @helpsBleyzer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 19:41 UTC66 views6 reactionsread 11 August 2026

@Cyllgig искренне благодарю за голос, большое спасибо!👅👅

custom 53551051718672076495custom 53686675876662821431

8 Aug 2026, 19:33 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ребзяя, извините, что прошу. голоса опять пропали, не могли бы вы, пожалуйста, проголосовать за канал? был бы очень вам благодарен, никого насильно голосовать не принуждаю ни в коем случае! ➞boost

custom 53686675876662821434👻1

5 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC146 views0 reactionsread 11 August 2026

Юри, искренне благодарю за звездочки!😋

4 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC159 viewsread 11 August 2026

от вас требуются только реакции и комментарии.

4 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC161 views67 reactions3 Starsread 11 August 2026
Photo

HEDCANON: 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘵𝘺𝘱𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘮𝘢𝘯, 𝘸𝘩𝘰.. / тот тип мужчины, который.. ★° 🏯 ┄ ꔛ 💡 . ??! ver: #WEAKHERO characters: #AhnSuHo , #YeonSiEun , #GeumSeonJae , #SokDae , #NaeBaekJin , #KangWooYeon , #ParkHuMin , #GoHyunTak , #SeoJoonTae ➞in the comments..

custom 53551051718672076493814custom 536866758766628214313🕊2

4 Aug 2026, 11:50 UTC63 viewsread 11 August 2026
Forwarded from @namraintouch

🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 1. подписка на этот канал 2. репост в канал/ если нет канала ничего не нужно! 3. пишите свой порядковый номер (1.2.3 и тд) выбирать будет числа рандомайзер. 1 место(первое чье число он выберет) - премиум на 3 месяца 2. место (второе чье число он выберет) - 100 звезд (💍/🏆/💎) 3. место (третье чье число он выберет) - 100 звезд (💍/🏆/💎) 4. место (четвертое число чье он выберет) - 50 звезд (💐/🎂/🚀) 5. мест

3 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC127 views7 reactionsread 11 August 2026

на сегодня окончим нашу беседу , всех благодарю за совместное времяпровождение. всем доброй ночи, если ложитесь спать.

custom 53686675876662821436custom 53551051718672076491

3 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC143 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

всех приветствую, скучали? я возвращаюсь. в скором времени выйдет коллаб, а там уже в дальнейшем и работы. буду надеяться на вашу активность на постах.👅👅

custom 53551051718672076493custom 53686675876662821431

30 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC234 views10 reactionsread 11 August 2026

бляя, чел с анона, спасибо большое! ахуенн.👅👅

custom 536866758766628214310

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @helpsBleyzer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Jul 2026, 16:23 UTCAnonymous Poll51 voters

всем папищикам салам. че думаете, выходить с реста , или не?

  1. да80%
  2. нет10%
  3. 🪭10%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПЕРЕЕЕЗД⋆✴︎˚. sᴋᴇᴛᴄʜᴇs ᴏꜰ ᴀ ʙʟᴇʏᴢᴇʀ” (@helpsBleyzer), 272 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helpsBleyzer.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.