так кароче,поскольку что то там еще пишут,я отвечать буду в ЩП!!! поскольку мне стыдно тут засорять

Channel
хэй,олздеад!
@helyolzdead
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
108subscribers
+26 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003664466721 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @helyolzdead |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/helyolzdead |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 01:21 | 108 | +3 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 17:58 | 105 | +12 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 15:53 | 93 | +3 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 90 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 07:33 | 88 | +6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 82 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:17 | 82 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5447303478168802816 | 5 | 71.4% | |
| custom 5447128578510576472 | 2 | 28.6% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
вче.больше не засоряю.пытаюсь.
о боже,мне ОЧЕНЬ стыдно что я засоряю каналам этим.я буду когда нибудь на это все в щп отвечать,клянусь😭 если насчет вопроса…..поцелуя не было..больше влюблялась в парней(обоже),а отношения не знаю,может да,может нет
был первый поцелуй?если да то с кем? больше влюблялась в парней или девушек?сейчас хочешь отношений?
что ж за вопросы такие.. да,но я не знаю?наверное одинаково все таки
Ты ж би? Тебя одинаково влечет к обоим полам,или к какому-то больше?
и девчули с которыми я в коллабе участвую,они мои враги,но я их люблю и восхищаюсь
ой,много таких.если говорить конкретно о эдиторвх то это мемилфа,аннета,кац,рэй,ночная моль.. на самом деле эдиторов которыми я восхищаюсь ОЧЕНЬ много,просто за ними вот я слежу дольше всех остальных наверное?
custom 54471285785105764721
Какие км тебя вдохновляют?
я их люблю👍ничего плохого в них как в пейринге не вижу,они милашки.может в скором времени сделаю с ними видео??хотя мне кажется сейчас уже постыдно говорить что ты не осуждаешь этот пейринг😀😀
custom 54473034781688028163
Как относишься к пейрингу джереми/жан?
Мои Арт hamrikaa
custom 54473034781688028162custom 54471285785105764721
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @helyolzdead. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@Vaicha_of · 1992 postsЛисоул
@lisoul08 · 1432 posts〢 кикорал ₊ . ˎˊ˗
@makkeniiz · 372 posts𝙈𝙖𝙧𝙩𝙮𝙧'𝙨 𝙧𝙚𝙛𝙪𝙜𝙚.🧿
@Martyrs_29 · 2081 post•𝑹𝒉𝒂𝒆𝒏𝒚𝒓𝒙 𝑳𝒆𝒏𝒔•
@Rhaenyrxs · 511 post🚬 𝙨𝙖𝙩𝙞𝙧𝙚×
@SatireLOL · 1081 post➳𝅄 ׄׄовсянка, сэр! 𝅄ᯏ𓈒.♡𝆬
@dlrntssal · 981 postִ ࣪ ˖ ࣪ ɦ𝗂𐓣α𝗋𝗋𝗂𐓣 ! ᰔ ִ ׄ
@hinarrin · 551 postНота Футур
@rinote · 661 postлинаn !рест
@spossdd · 561 post𝆭 ׅ֝֫٤֤֫ 𓈒 ᴛ᧐ᥴя ̼ܳ ֕ κᥱʙжᥲн᧐ʙнᥲ ִ ︵ֳֳ֥֦֧ׄ֬ ֳ𝆭֬
@tosiatgk0310 · 1161 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 1
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 0
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@helyolzdead named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Evidenced gone
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026 · confirmed gone 25 August 2026 (two independent sightings — see how we confirm a dead handle)evidenced
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“хэй,олздеад!” (@helyolzdead), 108 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/helyolzdead.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.