Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for У Пустого Престола. Свято место пусто

Channel

У Пустого Престола. Свято место пусто

@hetoimasia

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,797subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001328910309
TypeChannel
Username@hetoimasia
Created12 June 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hetoimasia

Topic

Science — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 35% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,7871,7971,7926 August 2026 — 1,787 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,787 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,788 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,791 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers21 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,793 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,792 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,794 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,795 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,791 subscribers12 September 2026 — 1,794 subscribers15 September 2026 — 1,797 subscribers6 August 202615 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 41 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,786–1,799 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 22:391,797+3
12 Sept 2026, 00:371,794+3
8 Sept 2026, 01:401,791-4
2 Sept 2026, 19:331,795+1
30 Aug 2026, 09:461,794+2
27 Aug 2026, 02:251,792-1
24 Aug 2026, 11:431,793-1
21 Aug 2026, 01:491,794+2
15 Aug 2026, 02:481,792-2
12 Aug 2026, 04:021,794+3
9 Aug 2026, 13:211,791+3
6 Aug 2026, 22:401,788+1
6 Aug 2026, 06:521,787no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:441,787first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 8 February 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6s
Average length
6s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

557 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍25545.8%
🙏15828.4%
custom 525593319588654605714225.5%
👎10.18%
😢10.18%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 557 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
35
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hetoimasia. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC570 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В 2021 Метцингер на базе статьи "Страдание" сформулировал мораторий об искусственном страдании — мол, давайте не плодить страдание в мире, давайте не развивать самосознающие ИИ, чтож вы люди делаете-то? В моратории буквально использовал термины типа бхава-танха, аппелировал к этике. Представители индустрии такие этические тэйки, разумеется проигнорировали ("братан, у нас тут возможность навара X10, какая этика? этика…

🙏11custom 52559331958865460579👍5

2 Aug 2026, 16:07 UTC987 views31 reactions35 Starsread 7 August 2026

Что занятно — ошибка приписывания страдания, как и ошибка приписывания самосознания — это та самая проблема "философского зомби". И по этому вопросу в 2011 году буддолог и философ Марк Сидеритс выдал текст с провокационным названием "Будды как зомби: буддийская редукция субъективности". Ну то есть название звучит провокационно для тех, кто не в курсе концепции "философского зомби", а в контексте этой концепции мысль …

custom 525593319588654605713👍9🙏9

26 Jul 2026, 14:11 UTC975 views46 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Чуть менее, чем десяток лет назад, Томас Метцингер написал статью о страдании — как оно видится с точки зрения его основной нейронаучной теории о "прозрачной Феноменальной Модели Себя", имеющей множество пересечений с анатмавадой. Не удивительно, что и его тэйки о страдании также имеют множество пересечений с буддийским дискурсом, пусть и не совпадают во всех деталях. А помимо разбора страдания, непостоянства и неве…

👍36🙏9custom 52559331958865460571

26 Mar 2026, 15:43 UTC≈1,590 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Несколько запоздалые интересные переводческие новости — обе от декабря прошлого года и обе — про второстепенные объекты специфического интереса данного канала (Односложную Праджняпарамиту и Уданаваргу). Во-первых, перевод и комментарий к Односложной Праджняпарамите появились на 84000.co (проект перевода всего Кангьюра, запущенный в 2009 году Дзонгсаром Кхъенце Норбу Ринпоче). Ничего особо нового, просто как факт. В…

🙏15👍8custom 52559331958865460577

3 Feb 2026, 20:19 UTC≈1,960 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Краткая выжимка по обширной истории джайнизма в виде вступительной статьи к книге Н.А. Железновой "Джайнизм. Энциклопедический словарь" (тираж книги, кстати, всего 200 экземпляров — наверное неплохо было бы оцифровать). Для несведущих в средневековой и относительно современной истории джайнизма — немало удивительного. Типа такого: Возникновение южноиндийской династии Хойсала (XII–XIV вв.) также связывается с дигамба…

🙏10custom 52559331958865460579👍4😢1

1 Feb 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,810 views76 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Будда был бритоголовым (часть 2)! То, что иконографический образ Татхагаты отличается от описаний в суттах никай и в сутрах агам, можно увидеть на примере следующих источников: Сутты, в которых различные брахманы видят Будду и определяют его как бритоголового (muṇḍaka), что вызывает у них предвзятость, поскольку бритоголовость обозначает его статус еретика, а то и вовсе изгоя (поскольку обривание головы, похоже, про…

👍55🙏14custom 52559331958865460577

14 Dec 2025, 18:34 UTC≈1,960 views25 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Poll

Чья это вотивная табличка?

  1. Брахманистская6%
  2. Буддистская17%
  3. Джайнская30%
  4. Адживиковская4%
  5. Шиваитская6%
  6. Вишнуитская3%
  7. Манихейская9%
  8. Ей-богу, православная!25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍13🙏6custom 52559331958865460576

14 Dec 2025, 18:34 UTC≈1,810 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Небольшая, так сказать, искусствоведческая викторина — чья это вотивная табличка?

12 Nov 2025, 09:25 UTC≈1,740 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Интересный пример современного аниконического почитания в Таиланде (с приложенным пэйпером на тему). Здесь любопытна конвергентная динамика культа вокруг текста Дхармы как тела Будды, когда текст становится объектом почитания. Напоминает историю появления (прото)махаянских школ, сконцентрированных вокруг ступ, в которые вместо останков Будды (как в Великих Ступах) заложены буддийские тексты (которые заменяют/олицетв…

custom 525593319588654605711👍2

12 Nov 2025, 09:25 UTC≈1,970 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @borankammatthanatraditionPhoto

There is a Tai group that practices a unique approach to Buddhism. For the Buddha is so sacred, they dare not to enshrine him in their homes, but rather venerate and build shrines for Dhamma text, emphasising the idea that the Buddha resides in his Dhamma (the Dhammakāya as taught in the Suttas), this group is known as the Tai Zawti: (Here is an academic article: https://englishkyoto-seas.org/2025/11/earlyview-olivi…

custom 525593319588654605713🙏5👍1

1 Sept 2025, 06:04 UTC≈2,840 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

С днём джняны! Два рельефа из Гандхары с сюжетом "Сиддхартха идёт в школу". То, что сын республиканского вождя наверняка мог получить достойное образование в ведийской Индии — вполне логично. И так как Шуддходана был скорее республиканским вождём, чем царём, а "дворец" наверняка был намного менее впечатляющим, чем это звучит в легендах, то навряд ли Сиддхартха изучал науки "на дому". Вот и в Гандхаре эпизод "Будущи…

👍38🙏18custom 525593319588654605710👎1

18 Aug 2025, 11:17 UTC≈1,850 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

После пятиминутки буддологии — минутка археологии Медальон-изображение Святилища древа Пробуждения Будды Конагаманы Махачайтья в Бхархуте, штат Мадхья-Прадеш Период Шунга, ок. 150–100 гг. до н.э. Песчаник, 68,6 x 49,5 x 17,1 см Надпись: Древо Бодхи святого Конагаманы Обнаружено при раскопках в Бхархуте в юго-восточном квадранте махачайтьи около 1873 г. Индийский музей, Калькутта (инв. 294) Среди найденных фрагмент…

🙏13👍11custom 52559331958865460576

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hetoimasia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

14 Dec 2025, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Quiz371 voters

Чья это вотивная табличка?

  1. Брахманистская6%
  2. Буддистская17%
  3. Джайнская30%
  4. Адживиковская4%
  5. Шиваитская6%
  6. Вишнуитская3%
  7. Манихейская9%
  8. Ей-богу, православная!25%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 8 February 2025 to 2 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Пробковый шлем
@pithhelmet · 23,201
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“У Пустого Престола. Свято место пусто” (@hetoimasia), 1,797 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hetoimasia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.