赶不上 DDL 了😢
🙏2

Channel
@hexagram_daily
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
989subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209937512 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hexagram_daily |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hexagram_daily |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:37 | 989 | -1 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 990 | -4 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 02:45 | 994 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 996 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 18:02 | 995 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:59 | 994 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:16 | 995 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
45 reactions across 9 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 20 | 44.4% | |
| ❤ | 6 | 13.3% | |
| 🥰 | 6 | 13.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🤯 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 4.44% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
赶不上 DDL 了😢
🙏2
今天有个 AI 研究员发信息给我说,这是她入行以来最糟的夏天。 DeepSeek 正式宣布涨价了,V4-Flash 的价格直接起飞,性能却还停留在被翻来覆去掂量的水平。 基准测试成绩已经不敢和 fable5 放在同一张表里比较。 一个总参数 284B、激活参数 13B 的“轻量版”模型,现在用起来贵得让人掏空钱包,却再也追不上那个曾经以为能平起平坐的 fable。 更离谱的是价格,Flash 版贵到令人发指,两杯奶茶钱都换不到多少 tokens。 她把手头所有的项目都重新算了一遍成本,结果发现自己彻底用不起了。 昨天在开发者群里,突然所有人停下手里的事,开始转发涨价截图和骂声。 她说自己特别崩溃,有种人类黄金时代彻底结束的错觉。
这个定型文是从哪里来的,怎么最近到处都是(
是我的问题喵,vibe code 不规范,debug 火葬场😭
珍爱生命,远离 SwiftUI 又要用到神秘的 ZStack { Color.clear.frame(height: 1) } 这种在 SwiftUI 刚出的时候写的 hack 了。。。
上了年纪就是喜欢看那种,演了12集没有比喝茶更大事情的动漫。
难绷
我就想问问,为什么我卸载APP的时候就必须得是残忍卸载,狠心离开,为什么我付钱的时候就得是立即支付,免密支付呢?你也残忍支付狠心支付呀,你也劝劝我呀,或者是你告诉我家破人亡支付,妻离子散支付,倾家荡产支付,一个月挣几个钱,你就付,所以你也问呀?还有我花100元就叫做小额支付,那怎么我领个0.1元的红包就叫大额补贴呢?还得让我开心领取,开心收下,我怎么那么开心呢?我在开心些什么呢?我请问,最可气的是这个扭动手机跳转页面,我放桌子上不动,它也跳转呀,干嘛?地球自转也是转呗?谁能给我解释解释呀?
😁12
越到 DDL 发现的问题越多(
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3❤1
好热
准备起飞了喵🛫
🥰3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hexagram_daily. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hexagram Daily(想要成为人类)” (@hexagram_daily), 989 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hexagram_daily.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.