Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 43 days, net -87. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,154–5,268 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 04:19
5,167
-16
13 Sept 2026, 20:39
5,183
-12
9 Sept 2026, 21:20
5,195
-6
4 Sept 2026, 04:02
5,201
-9
31 Aug 2026, 18:56
5,210
-6
28 Aug 2026, 15:32
5,216
-5
25 Aug 2026, 14:05
5,221
-14
22 Aug 2026, 05:48
5,235
-5
18 Aug 2026, 17:22
5,240
-5
15 Aug 2026, 17:17
5,245
-6
12 Aug 2026, 14:15
5,251
+1
10 Aug 2026, 00:02
5,250
-5
7 Aug 2026, 07:20
5,255
+1
6 Aug 2026, 10:33
5,254
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:49
5,254
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 15 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
23m 18s
Average length
4m 40s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
901 reactions across 23 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
246
27.3%
❤
192
21.3%
😁
135
15.0%
👏
110
12.2%
🔥
84
9.32%
🤣
51
5.66%
🤮
11
1.22%
🤔
9
0.999%
🤪
9
0.999%
💩
8
0.888%
👎
7
0.777%
🙈
6
0.666%
🙏
6
0.666%
🤝
4
0.444%
🥰
4
0.444%
👀
3
0.333%
💯
3
0.333%
👌
2
0.222%
😡
2
0.222%
🤬
2
0.222%
6 further kinds
7
0.777%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 23 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 901 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 23 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hhamidov. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 23 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
В то время как вроде бы такие же люди как мы где-то там вот-вот покорят Марс, ищут лекарство от рака, стремительно развивают искусственный интеллект или биокомпьютеры, наши люди спорят на исторические темы, снимают исторические фильмы, ведут исторические дебаты на исторических телепередачах и все еще задаются вопросом кто мы, будто ответа на этот вопрос не существует...
И ладно, если бы все это было качественно, по…
Одна из главных серьезных проблем современного общества (его большинства) заключается в том, что его нынешние моральные авторитеты, так часто мелькающие в СМИ и соцсетях, в большинстве своем (не все) таковыми на самом деле считаться не должны, примитивны, агрессивны, а некоторые из них так и вовсе аморальны по натуре и пропагандируемым ценностям. Те же, кто моральными авторитетами быть могут и должны, в обществе (его…
Azərbaycan Əlifbası və Azərbaycan Dili Günündə illərdir rusdilliləri düşmən kimi qələmə verən, onların guya öz ana dilini bilmədiyini, ona hörmət etmədiyini və onu sevmədiyini hayqıran insanlara bir şeyi səmimi qəlbdən arzulamaq istəyirəm: qoy onlar, nəhayət, özlərinin danışdığı, çox vaxt isə sərbəst danışdıqları yeganə dil olan Azərbaycan dilinin düşdüyü vəziyyətdən həqiqətən narahat olsunlar.
Artıq demək olar qırx…
Браво, Испания! Браво! Самая достойная команда чемпионата выигрывает его и делает это красиво, сильно, грамотно, в финале обыграв весь мундиаль игравшую грязно, а местами и вовсе подло Аргентину, на протяжении всего турнира напоминавшую мне ребят из детства, нападавших толпой то на соперников, то на судей!
И даже после свистка в финале аргентинцы были бы не аргентинцами, если бы не затеяли потасовку, потому что прои…
Двое суток в голове крутится счет 5:0 в пользу Испании. Наверное, выдаю желаемое за действительное )
@hhamidov
👍12🤣6🥰2😡2👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @hhamidov. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 15 June 2026 to 9 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hhamidov named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hhamudov named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Day.Az @dayaz · 24,632 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 September 2026
Девичья Башня @maidentower · 33,962 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 3 September 2026
Бакинский Бурила @bakburila · 94,776 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 22 August 2026
SALEH▪️NASIROV @nasirovsaleh · 35,740 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 3 September 2026
Azərbaycan Respublikası Müdafiə Nazirliyi / MoD of the Republic of Azerbaijan @Azerbaijan_MOD · 22,637 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 September 2026
Minval Politika @minval_az · 23,244 Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 18 September 2026
Operativ Məlumat Mərkəzi @operativmm · 82,126 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 August 2026
AZERBAIJANI ARMED FORCES 24/7 @military_az · 23,964 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
Caliber @caliber_az_official · 51,098 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 24 August 2026
Qafqazinfo @qafqazinfo · 30,268 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
✍🏻Tipik İqtisadçı-Ekspert📈 @eco_expert · 42,468 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 August 2026
Haqqin.az @haqqin_azz · 58,982 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 22 August 2026
Кямиль Аскерханов - Мнение @KamilAskerkhanov · 23,594 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 18 September 2026
Operativ Media @operativmedia · 81,412 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Игорь Коротченко @igor_korotchenko · 22,944 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
BakuES @baku_es · 180,327 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 22 August 2026
isayevios 🇦🇿 @isayevios · 24,238 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 September 2026
Baku TV @bakutvxeber · 25,908 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 13 September 2026
JobSearch.az- İş elanları/ Vakansiya/ Təcrübə proqramları @jobsearchazerbaijan · 76,390 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
Dövlət İmtahan Mərkəzi @stateexamcenter · 46,800 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 26 August 2026
Oxu.Az @oxuaze · 41,503 Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 30 August 2026
Busy.az Vakansiyalar @busy_az_vakansiyalar · 27,286 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 11 September 2026
Glorri - Vakansiyalar 💼 @glori_jobs · 54,963 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 August 2026
Edumap.az - Vakansiyalar, Təcrübə Proqramları və s. @edumapazz · 26,476 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 September 2026
This channel appears in 34 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hamid Hamidov” (@hhamidov), 5,167 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hhamidov.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.