Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 56% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 44 days, net +860. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,381–7,768 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 12:01
7,401
-77
14 Sept 2026, 18:55
7,478
-34
10 Sept 2026, 21:41
7,512
-96
5 Sept 2026, 16:16
7,608
+170
1 Sept 2026, 22:17
7,438
+766
29 Aug 2026, 20:23
6,672
+26
26 Aug 2026, 16:59
6,646
+84
24 Aug 2026, 02:03
6,562
-8
20 Aug 2026, 05:53
6,570
+10
16 Aug 2026, 22:18
6,560
-15
13 Aug 2026, 05:26
6,575
+14
9 Aug 2026, 19:41
6,561
+19
7 Aug 2026, 02:58
6,542
+1
6 Aug 2026, 20:47
6,541
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 32 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 38s
Average length
55s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
408 reactions across 27 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5255740600963047101
120
29.4%
custom 5312067022580883670
106
26.0%
custom 5246810281622905968
93
22.8%
💔
40
9.80%
custom 5334853035266944015
20
4.90%
😭
9
2.21%
👍
8
1.96%
custom 5334603549206653829
6
1.47%
custom 5445360628237614380
6
1.47%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
29 августа поём гимн лета вместе с Бьянкой на набережной Финского залива🌻
королева русского народного R’n’B, под песни которой мы влюблялись, страдали, танцевали и собирались «поехать на море» уже не одно лето💔
Бьянка выступит вживую. так что готовьте голос заранее: «Были танцы», «Про лето» и другие любимые треки будем петь всем заливом!
29 августа / 18:00–01:00 + афтепати
Брусницын / Кожевенная линия, 30
последн…
питер, 29 августа тусуемся с Платоном Гороховым💛
вы точно видели его в рекомендациях — в каком именно образе, предугадать уже сложнее)) Платон умеет превратить буквально всё в шоу, поэтому 29 августа доверяем ему ещё и диджейский пульт.
Платон сыграет один из хэдлайнерских сетов на нашем большом опен-эйре «ЭТО ЛЕТО!»
что ещё ждёт вас:
— Бьянка с живым выступлением, Натали Сычевская, BADBARBIE, KLOPOTÁ + 15 диджеев…
цена на входной билет выросла!
теперь нужно искать себе пару или даже нескольких людей, чтобы взять выгодный билет🎟️🎟️🎟️
кстати для этого мы и сделали чуть выше пост для знакомств - велкам!
ПРИСАЖИВАЙТЕСЬ ПОУДОБНЕЕ
29 августа мой первый Dj SET
Внимание!!!!
С МАМОЙ💔💔💔
Сразу фестиваль, сразу главная сцена, сразу хэдлайнеры
ПИТЕР 29 августа всех ждем на фестивале ЭТО ЛЕТО
Честно сказать, волнуюсь, ибо нужно сойтись в музыке с мамой и публике угодить
В любом случае это будет легендарно
Жду вас, Вашу поддержку , вот тут инфа
Мы за пультом в 22:30 ❤️
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @hhhhhhhhhhhccccccccccc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
а вы бы хотели посетить нашу последнюю дневную вечеринку в этом сезоне?🌼
даааа!🔥44%
нее, я больше по ночным🪩30%
я вообще жду фестиваль «ЭТО ЛЕТО!» 29 августа🤪30%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 20 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
PITERTUSOVKA @pitertusovkaa · 24,966 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 15 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отель Калифорния | вечеринки и кофе-рейвы” (@hhhhhhhhhhhccccccccccc), 7,401 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hhhhhhhhhhhccccccccccc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
