Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for HIND CYBER GHOST

Channel

HIND CYBER GHOST

@hind_cyber_ghost

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

259subscribers

+20 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003369267116
TypeChannel
Username@hind_cyber_ghost
CreatedBetween 1 November 2025 and 31 March 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hind_cyber_ghost

Growth

2392592497 August 2026 — 239 subscribers7 August 2026 — 239 subscribers14 August 2026 — 242 subscribers20 August 2026 — 248 subscribers27 August 2026 — 255 subscribers3 September 2026 — 259 subscribers7 August 20263 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net +20. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 236–262 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 06:08259+4
27 Aug 2026, 11:28255+7
20 Aug 2026, 11:33248+6
14 Aug 2026, 11:38242+3
7 Aug 2026, 10:32239no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:18239first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 29 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

59 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3457.6%
🔥1220.3%
🤣1016.9%
👍23.39%
🥰11.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 12:38 UTC208 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

> Old database of samaa TV urdu portal > URL: https://admin.paknewswire.com/datamanger.php DB_CONNECTION=mysql DB_HOST=127.0.0.1 DB_PORT=3306 DB_DATABASE=urdusamaa12_db DB_USERNAME=urdusamaa12_user DB_PASSWORD=yx+><D3^0JQw@Jl1I2<v

4🔥1

14 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC413 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026

🚨 EKHON TV BACKEND — TAKEOVER CONFIRMED. We successfully gained full backend access to Ekhon TV last night. 👁️ Target: Bangladesh 🇧🇩 Channel: Ekhon TV (City Group subsidiary) 🔗 Website: https://ekhon.tv/ 🏢 Owner: Spice Television Ltd 📍 Base: Tikatuli, Dhaka 📊 Digital Reach: 4.2M+ YouTube subscribers + millions daily viewers We found the vulnerabilities. CVE-2026-XXXXX (CRITICAL 9.1) — stays hidden. 💀 We're inside

4

12 Jul 2026, 13:19 UTC282 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

👻 The ghost is alive. And this time — it's an on-demand paid attack. 💰 Target is locked. Someone paid. We deliver. A ransom demand has been placed. Pay up, or watch your entire network burn. ⏳ Something big is coming in the next few hours. This isn't just a hack — it's business. 😏 Keep your backups ready. You'll need them. 🔥 — TAI · HCG · KCD #HindCyberGhost #TeamAnonymousIndia #THEREDEAGLE #NirvanaCyberArmy #K

4👍1

8 Jul 2026, 13:22 UTC266 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

WH04M1 Intel isn't just another cyber news channel. It's a live intelligence feed tracking vulnerabilities, threat actors, malware campaigns, phishing attacks, ransomware activity, and breaking cybersecurity developments. Join now: 🔗 https://t.me/WH04M1Intel

1

5 Jul 2026, 07:38 UTC365 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Message: MF PK & BD skids, we are not like you.. Message for Subscribers: Sorry guys, and we apologize you - we cannot release the POH video of GEO News because OBS crashed during the recording, which resulted in a completely blank video. And the whole Jang Media Group network is affected by CVE-2022-44276 vulnerability because they use the same source code across their entire network of websites. Affected website

2🔥1

5 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC298 viewsread 7 August 2026

who mf tell this is fake mf go and see https://www.geo.tv/status?full&html Dir :- /var/www/gn.geo.tv/html/index.php CMS Path :: https://www.geo.tv/install Vul :- https://www.geo.tv/themes/admin/js/editors/filemanager/dialog.php Endpoint :- https://www.geo.tv//assets/front/tiny_mce/source/shell.php?cmd=ls CVE-2022-44276 is a critical security vulnerability in Responsive Filemanager (versions prior to 9.12.0) th

2 Jul 2026, 00:27 UTC466 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Koi inko bata do 😭 next no uska hin h jisko aap safe bata rahe ho 🌚 and assalam walekum and vulnerability ki to baat hin mat karna Remember:- No system is Safe 😭 Ek cheez sabke liye Jitna bada network jitne jada subdomain utna jada risk...

🔥5👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @hind_cyber_ghost. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“HIND CYBER GHOST” (@hind_cyber_ghost), 259 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hind_cyber_ghost.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.