Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
9,840 average views per post against 10,607 subscribers — an engagement rate of 92.7%. Across the 6,195 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,003–31,621 subscribers, posting mainly in Persian — the middle half sit between 2.86% and 13.3%, with a median of 6.61%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (25 August 2026 – 24 September 2026)
Posts measured
23 of 23 published in the window (0 exact, 23 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
226,210
Mature posts only
94.1% over 17 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 24 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -1,910. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,237–13,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 09:16
10,607
-88
15 Sept 2026, 12:01
10,695
+1,900
11 Sept 2026, 15:20
8,795
-756
6 Sept 2026, 18:01
9,551
-462
4 Sept 2026, 09:55
10,013
-255
2 Sept 2026, 22:03
10,268
-173
1 Sept 2026, 17:07
10,441
-192
31 Aug 2026, 17:44
10,633
-174
30 Aug 2026, 14:49
10,807
-202
29 Aug 2026, 16:36
11,009
-184
28 Aug 2026, 18:33
11,193
-147
27 Aug 2026, 21:45
11,340
-81
27 Aug 2026, 00:03
11,421
-38
25 Aug 2026, 21:52
11,459
-40
25 Aug 2026, 01:17
11,499
-10
23 Aug 2026, 12:05
11,509
-74
21 Aug 2026, 23:38
11,583
-3
20 Aug 2026, 21:17
11,586
-18
19 Aug 2026, 22:34
11,604
-31
18 Aug 2026, 21:46
11,635
first reading
Engagement
152 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 41 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
92.7%
avg views ÷ 10,607 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,840
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.043%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 152 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 August 2026
Posts held
152 (3 August 2026 – 29 August 2026)
Views total
226,210
Reactions total
69
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
29 Aug 2026, 10:55 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
21m 44s
Average length
31s
Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
401 reactions across 100 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
247
61.6%
👎
52
13.0%
👏
51
12.7%
👍
18
4.49%
💔
9
2.24%
🤬
7
1.75%
😢
6
1.50%
😍
5
1.25%
🔥
3
0.748%
💯
2
0.499%
😱
1
0.249%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 106 of the 152 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 404 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 152 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 29 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
حرکت جوانمردانه دانشآموز اردبیلی در مسابقات کشوری؛ «زینب شیخی» تندیس اخلاق را از آن خود کرد
💠 در جریان برگزاری مسابقات قهرمانی داژبال دانشآموزی کشور، «زینب شیخی» دانشآموز ورزشکار و شایسته استان اردبیل، با خلق صحنهای کمنظیر از روح جوانمردی و مرام پهلوانی، موفق به دریافت عنوان و نشان «ورزشکار بااخلاق» این دوره از رقابتها شد.
این ورزشکار بااخلاق اردبیلی در جریان یک دیدار حساس، زمانی که بازیکن تیم حریف تعادل خود…
بصیرت و مقاومت؛ دو بال پیروزی جبهه حق است
امام جمعه هیر گفت: متقین اهل بصیرت، صبر و مقاومت هستند که دو عامل پیروزی بر دشمنان است. باید بصیر، صبور و مقام بود.
حجتالاسلام حسن صفری در خطبههای نخستین آیین عبادی و سیاسی نماز جمعه شهر هیر که در مسجد جامع این شهر برگزار شد، ضمن دعوت نمازگزاران به رعایت تقوای الهی با تبیین مؤلفههای بصیرت و مقاومت در برابر استکبار و تمسک به کلام امیرالمؤمنین(ع) در نهجالبلاغه، اظهار کرد…
وقتی در تاریکی شب به عمق آسمان خیره میشوی، زمان گویی متوقف میشود. از فراز شهر هیر، ماه در نهایت جلال رخ مینماید و گذر سایهروشن ابرها از برابر نور تابانش، سمفونی سکوت و آرامش را مینوازد. هر فریم از این حرکت، جلوهای از عظمت بیانتهای آفرینش است.»
🎙️ تصویر، تهیه و تنظیم: جاوید سیفی
📌 لوکیشن: آسمان شب شهر هیر
💠 هـــیر نــیوز
🆔 @hirnews
⭕️ کاهش محسوس دمای هوا در بسیاری از نقاط کشور از اواسط هفته آینده
🔹 از اواسط هفته آینده با ریزش هوای خنک به کشور شاهد کاهش محسوس دمای هوا در بسیاری از نقاط استان های نیمه شمالی کشور خواهیم بود.
🔹 با ریزش این خنکی و کاهش محسوس دمای هوا ، انتظار هوایی خنک را در بسیاری از نقاط کشور از روز های دوشنبه و سه شنبه به بعد را خواهیم داشت .
🔹با وقوع این کاهش دما ، بسیاری از نقاط کشور شاهد دماهای کمتر از نرمال خواهند بود و شرای…
صبح، آغاز دوبارهی زندگیست؛ نسیمی که امید را در جان میدمد و نوری که تاریکیهای دل را کنار میزند
☀️درود و صبح بخیر☀️
ـــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــــ
📆امروز جمعه
۶ شهریور ۱۴۰۵
۱۴ ربیعالاول ۱۴۴۸
۲۸ اوت ۲۰۲۶
💠 هـــیر نــیوز
🆔 @hirnews
♦️ یک جفت کفش از پوست کروکودیل با قیمت ۱۰ میلیارد تومان؛ نمونهای عجیب از فاصله قیمتها در بازار کالاهای لوکس
فاصله طبقاتی یعنی این...
منم از صبح درگیر sms بسته اینترنتم هستم که ۸۵ درصدش استفاده شده😔
💠 هـــیر نــیوز
🆔 @hirnews
خیر مقدم گویی مهنّا پورخلیقی به مناسبت ورود امام جمعه محترم به شهر هیر
💠 هـــیر نــیوز
🆔 @hirnews
👎8👏4
Signed Javid Seyfi
Showing the 12 most recent of 152 posts we hold for @hirnews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@hirnews named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@hir_news named in 2 posts, 26 August 2026 – 29 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
𝗗𝗝 𝗞𝗘𝗡𝗭𝗢 @djkenzo1 · 72,850 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“هیر نیوز” (@hirnews), 10,607 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hirnews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.