Channel
@history_perspective
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
3,182subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001535034928 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @history_perspective |
| Created | 8 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/history_perspective |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 23:56 | 3,182 | -1 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 19:01 | 3,183 | -2 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 3,185 | +4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:18 | 3,181 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 04:22 | 3,178 | -1 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 16:05 | 3,179 | +4 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 3,175 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 3,170 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 3,173 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:20 | 3,176 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:17 | 3,175 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 23 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
141 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 82 | 58.2% | |
| 👍 | 44 | 31.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 5.67% | |
| 😢 | 6 | 4.26% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.709% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 141 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 26 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✅ کاوشهای باستان شناسی دژ الموت 🔺 حمیده چوبک 📆 ۷ اسفند ۱۳۹۶ منبع: انجمن علمی باستان شناسی دانشگاه هنر اصفهان @archaeology_artuniversityisfahan . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤5🔥2👏1
خوب شد، دردم دوا شد… شادباد به جامعه باستانشناسی و میراث بانان ایرانی از جمله استاد چوبک که بعد از ۲۵ عاشقی و تلاش این مجموعه بی نظیر را ثبت جهانی نمودند. همچنین تبریک به جامعه اسماعیلی ایران دکتر #حمیده_چوبک #باستانشناس برجسته ایرانی و مدیر پیشین پایگاه میراث فرهنگی الموت، نقش کلیدی در کاوشهای علمی و ثبت جهانی دژ #الموت داشته است. وی سالها سرپرستی کاوشها و پژوهشهای باستانشناسی در محوطه تاریخی الموت را بر عهده…
❤8🔥2
«دژ الموت و استحکامات دفاعی وابسته به آن» در چهلوهشتمین کمیته میراث جهانی یونسکو در بوسان کره جنوبی ثبت جهانی شد و به عنوان سیامین اثر ایران در فهرست میراث جهانی یونسکو قرار گرفت. این پرونده شامل هفت قلعه از جمله الموت، لمسر، نویذر شاه، شمسکلایه، شیرکوه، ایلان و قسطینلار است که مجموعهای مدیریتی و دفاعی را در سرزمین الموت شکل میدهند. این آثار از نظر معماری، مهندسی، سازگاری با اقلیم کوهستانی و مدیریت منابع، بهو…
❤5👍2🔥1
✅ جغرافیای تاریخی-سیاسی #عیلام در هزارههای سوم و دوم قبل از میلاد 🔺 طاهره شکری 🔺 دبیر نشست: زهره نظرپور 📆 ۲ مهر ۱۴۰۰ منبع: اینستاگرام انجمن علمی دانشجویی تاریخ دانشگاه شهید بهشتی https://www.instagram.com/sbu_history?igsh=YWRwcnFybXdwZzJw . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤2👍2
✅ جغرافیای تاریخی-سیاسی #عیلام در هزارههای سوم و دوم قبل از میلاد 🔺 کامیار عبدی 🔺 دبیر نشست: طاهره شکری 📆 ۱۵ مرداد ۱۴۰۰ منبع: اینستاگرام انجمن علمی دانشجویی تاریخ دانشگاه شهید بهشتی https://www.instagram.com/sbu_history?igsh=YWRwcnFybXdwZzJw #عیلامیان #ایلام #ایلامیان . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤2👍2
✅ How the Horse Changed the World. 🔺 Interview with Author David Chaffetz 🟣 David Chaffetz, author of the recent and truly outstanding book Raiders, Rulers, and Traders: The Horse and the Rise of Empires, joins Tides to talk about the long and intertwined history of horses and people in Central Asia and beyond. The trade in horses, not silks and spices, was the true connective tissue joining together the ancient an…
👍3❤1
✅ اسطوره کاوی قدرت: شهریاران 🔺 دکتر بهمن نامور مطلق منبع: آپارات رادیو شمسه https://www.aparat.com/v/sxcp518#video-description . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
👍2❤1
✅ جنبش ضد اموی، ابومسلم خراسانی و نقش ایرانیان 🔺 علی بهرامیان 🔺 جواد اصغری 📆 ۳ آذر ۱۴۰۴ منبع: مردمنامه https://t.me/mardomnameh . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤2👍2
✅ مبانی انسانشناسی شناختی برای باستان شناسان 🔺 لیلا اردبیلی 📆 ۱۰ بهمن ماه ۱۴۰۳ منبع: انجمن انسانشناسی ایران https://t.me/leilaardebili . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
👍2❤1
✅ بررسی زن پارینهسنگی و دگرگشت انسان در تاریخ 🔺 سمانه نظیف؛ دکتری باستانشناسی پیش از تاریخ، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس. 🔺 میزبان: جواد حسینزاده؛ دکتری باستانشناسی پیش از تاریخ، مدیر پایگاه میراث فرهنگی سیلک، عضو هیأتعلمی دانشگاه کاشان. 📆 ۱۶ آذرماه ۱۴۰۴ منبع: بنیاد فرهنگی ایران و انیران باستان https://t.me/ancienteranandaneranchanel . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
👍4❤2
🟣 گستره پرستش ایزد بهرام(ورثرغنه) 🔺 کیارا ریمونچی هاینه، پژوهشگر دانشگاه بن 📆 ۹ مهر ۱۳۹۷ منبع: سایت پژوهشگاه علوم انسانی و مطالعات فرهنگی https://www.ihcs.ac.ir/ . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤2👍2
✅ کتیبه داریوش در کانال سوئز 🔺 فاطمه جهانپور 🟣 خط، زبان، موقعیت، انگیزه ایجاد کتیبه داریوش هخامنشی در سوئز و یاد از شادی 📆 ۱ تیر ۱۴۰۵ جلسه برگزار شده در مرکز اسناد و کتابخانه ملی شرق کشور(مشهد) #هخامنشی #هخامنشیان . 🌍 چشم انداز تاریخ 🌍 @history_perspective
❤2👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @history_perspective. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“چشم انداز تاریخ” (@history_perspective), 3,182 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/history_perspective.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.