Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
29 measurements spanning 39 days, net -66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,091–23,179 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 23:38
23,101
-15
15 Sept 2026, 17:18
23,116
-4
14 Sept 2026, 03:36
23,120
+1
12 Sept 2026, 12:41
23,119
-15
10 Sept 2026, 07:58
23,134
+8
7 Sept 2026, 01:17
23,126
-9
4 Sept 2026, 11:15
23,135
+8
2 Sept 2026, 19:35
23,127
-7
1 Sept 2026, 16:18
23,134
-3
31 Aug 2026, 19:35
23,137
+7
30 Aug 2026, 16:55
23,130
-5
29 Aug 2026, 16:36
23,135
-7
27 Aug 2026, 19:18
23,142
-1
26 Aug 2026, 16:42
23,143
-3
25 Aug 2026, 15:27
23,146
+6
24 Aug 2026, 12:39
23,140
+8
22 Aug 2026, 19:58
23,132
+3
21 Aug 2026, 12:02
23,129
-1
20 Aug 2026, 13:22
23,130
-17
19 Aug 2026, 10:27
23,147
first reading
Engagement
27 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 46 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
26.6%
avg views ÷ 23,101 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,140
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.337%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
6
of 27 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
27 (21 July 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
36,830
Reactions total
124
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 11:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
43s
Average length
43s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,125 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 74.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
834
74.1%
👍
187
16.6%
👌
41
3.64%
🥰
38
3.38%
👏
11
0.978%
😢
8
0.711%
🎉
6
0.533%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,125 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
असिस्टेंट प्रोफेसर ( इतिहास ) 2023 का परिणाम जारी हुआ , मेरे लिए बड़ा गर्व कि विषय है की हर चौथा चयनित साथी हिस्ट्री पॉइंट से जुड़ा रहा है । हालांकि प्रोफेसर जैसे पद तक पहुँचने की प्रक्रिया कठिन रास्ते से गुज़रती है , तो स्वाभाविक है कई शिक्षकों और साधनों का साथ आवश्यक होता है। इसलिए मैं मेरा योगदान लेस मात्र ही मानता हूँ ।
जिस भी साथी ने अपनी कृतज्ञता ज्ञापित की केवल उन्हीं का फोटो इसमें शामिल किया है, हालांकि कई च…
अंततः असिस्टेंट प्रोफेसर इतिहास का परिणाम आयोग ने कल जारी किया । अभ्यर्थियों में चर्चा का विषय था की मेरिट अधिक रही , हालांकि परीक्षा के दो दिन बाद मैंने कट ऑफ पर चर्चा की थी और मेरिट 135 -140 अंक का आंकलन किया था , तो मुझे लगता है मेरिट अनुकूल ही रही है ।
कल से काफ़ी चयनित साथियों के आभार संदेश प्राप्त हो रहे है , आगामी एक दो दिन में जो भी सूचना प्राप्त होगी उस अनुरूप एक पोस्टर भी बनायेंगे और प्रयास करेंगे की सफल स…
व्याख्याता राजनीति विज्ञान का परिणाम :
आयोग द्वारा जारी राजनीति विज्ञान के परिणाम में 645 सीट के विरुद्ध कुल जमा 67अभ्यर्थी ही उत्तीर्ण हो पाए , और ये स्थति कई और विषय जैसे फिजिक्स, भूगोल , कोच , प्रोफेसर पोलिटिकल साइंस इत्यादि के साथ भी है। ज़ाहिर सी बात है न्यूनतम अंक का क्राइटेरिया पार नहीं करने दिया गया ।
अब कुछ विकृत मानसिकता के विक्षिप्त लोग कोचिंग अथवा नोट्स अथवा अभ्यर्थी को दोषी बता रहे, कुछ लोग सुझाव दे रह…
🌟 सिन्धु घाटी सभ्यता
Q 48. हड़प्पा सभ्यता और मेसोपोटामिया की सभ्यता के बीच लिपि के आधार पर क्या मुख्य अंतर है ?
हड़प्पा की लिपि भावचित्रात्मक है, जबकि मेसोपोटामिया की कीलाक्षर (Cuneiform) है68%
हड़प्पा की लिपि को पढ़ा जा चुका है, मेसोपोटामिया की नहीं19%
मेसोपोटामिया में किसी लिपि का अभाव था6%
दोनों सभ्यताओं में एक ही लिपि का प्रयोग होता था8%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
❤21👌12
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @history_point_official. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 14 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🌟 सिन्धु घाटी सभ्यता
Q 42. 1856 ई. में लाहौर और कराची के बीच रेलवे लाइन बिछाते समय किन्हें पक्की ईंटें प्राप्त हुई थीं ?
जॉन मार्शल11%
जॉन व विलियम ब्रेंटम66%
अलेक्जेंडर कनिघम19%
दयाराम साहनी4%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
RAJSTHAN GK RAS REET BSTC EXAM @Rajsthan_GK_RAS_REET_BSTC_EXAM · 32,433 Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 4 September 2026
एच. पी. टेलर @hptailor1710 · 38,632 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 31 August 2026
All Time Toppers @alltimetoppersonline · 21,020 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 25 September 2026
Science First™ @sciencefirstindia · 39,449 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Avni Education Current Affairs & Quiz @Avnid5 · 40,182 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 30 August 2026
Kalam Test Series Official @KalamTestSeries · 182,206 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
UTKARSH AGRICULTURE CLASSES @agricultureutkarsh · 42,511 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 28 August 2026
Bhatia Ashram @bhatiaashram01509222300 · 54,488 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 23 August 2026
SWADHYAY SURATGARH स्वाध्याय सूरतगढ़ Sumer singh shekhawat सुमेर सिंह शेखावत 💯 @SWADHYAY_SUMER_SINGH_SHEKHAWAT · 22,075 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 21 September 2026
Pawan bhanwariya Assistant Professor @bhanwariyaP · 86,772 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 18 August 2026
Dr Ganpat Singh Rajpurohit @Ganpatsinghraj89 · 250,453 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 11 August 2026
Success Point Barmer™ @successpointbarmer11 · 71,343 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 20 August 2026
Kalam Academy Jaipur Class Time Table @KalamAcademyJaipurClassTime · 69,739 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 20 August 2026
Rajasthan Current Affairs By Utkarsh Classes @RajCurrentAffairsByUtkarsh · 85,889 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 18 August 2026
RAS Exam™ @RAS_RPSC_REET_Patwari · 233,884 Telegram ranks this channel #88 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 11 August 2026
GK BY NEWARI SIR ( RES ) @newarisir · 75,836 Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 19 August 2026
Dr Dheer Singh Dhabhai Official @dh5av · 212,149 Telegram ranks this channel #92 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
Sankalp Classes Barmer ™ @Sankalpclassesbmr34 · 153,574 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 12 August 2026
GOURAV GYAN DHARA @gouravgyandhara · 334,767 Telegram ranks this channel #95 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 10 August 2026
Subhash Charan @officialsubhashcharan · 393,873 Telegram ranks this channel #97 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“History Point” (@history_point_official), 23,101 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/history_point_official.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
