Channel
@historyindrawing
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
43subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001690565851 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @historyindrawing |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/historyindrawing |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:16 | 43 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:01 | 41 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 41 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 11 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
112 reactions across 7 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5253741684528789541 | 17 | 15.2% | |
| 💘 | 12 | 10.7% | |
| custom 5418027035459085606 | 11 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5433739434577130494 | 11 | 9.82% | |
| custom 5431405940190491919 | 8 | 7.14% | |
| ❤ | 8 | 7.14% | |
| ❤🔥 | 8 | 7.14% | |
| 💔 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| 😱 | 6 | 5.36% | |
| custom 5267193423315624241 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 4.46% | |
| ⚡ | 3 | 2.68% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| 😨 | 2 | 1.79% | |
| custom 5219776649360337268 | 1 | 0.893% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 0.893% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 112 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ура рисуночки из магмы(я как лох среди богов) Все таки в магме слишком круто рисовать, спасибо Тусе за такую прекрасную штуку
💘5❤🔥3custom 52537416845287895412custom 54337394345771304942custom 52197766493603372681custom 52671934233156242411
Bye bye. You were the best dog.🙄 🤩
💔6😭5😨2💘1
Random.
custom 54314059401904919195custom 52671934233156242413custom 52537416845287895412💘1
🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 Мне так не нравятся цвета здесь, поэтому еще чб версия
custom 52537416845287895415custom 54180270354590856063❤🔥2custom 54314059401904919192💘1custom 52671934233156242411custom 54337394345771304941
Мне кажеться или так не должно быть
😱6custom 54180270354590856065custom 54337394345771304944💘2
Ой, new sketch Ура. Я скоро закончу крутой арт который почему то рисую 23 часа ну ладно. Вам кстати не понравится
❤5custom 52537416845287895415custom 54337394345771304944❤🔥3🔥2🍓1💘1custom 54180270354590856061
Не опять а снова🤩 Хоть это было 7 числа, но не важно(это тг медленно работает, честно). В этот раз было в сто раз жарче, ну зато машин было побольше. И самый гдавный факт что летом намного лучше чем зимой.
🔥4⚡3❤3custom 52537416845287895413💯2custom 54180270354590856062💘1custom 54314059401904919191
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @historyindrawing. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Anixx.Arl” (@historyindrawing), 43 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/historyindrawing.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.