Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Звёздный Атлас

Channel

Звёздный Атлас

@historywizard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,271subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002474836528
TypeChannel
Username@historywizard
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/historywizard

Growth

1,2711,2891,2808 August 2026 — 1,273 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,281 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,287 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,289 subscribers22 August 2026 — 1,285 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,283 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,280 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,277 subscribers3 September 2026 — 1,276 subscribers7 September 2026 — 1,271 subscribers8 August 20267 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 30 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,268–1,292 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 14:381,271-5
3 Sept 2026, 00:471,276-1
31 Aug 2026, 08:241,277-3
28 Aug 2026, 02:571,280-3
25 Aug 2026, 09:021,283-2
22 Aug 2026, 13:081,285-4
16 Aug 2026, 02:241,289+2
12 Aug 2026, 17:371,287+6
9 Aug 2026, 11:511,281+8
8 Aug 2026, 14:451,273first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 32s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

83 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 73.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6173.5%
🔥89.64%
👏44.82%
😁44.82%
🤔22.41%
🤯22.41%
👍11.20%
😭11.20%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 83 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC39 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Как пыль скрыла целый мир: великий шторм на Марсе 2001 года 🌪 В июле 2001 года заурядный локальный вихрь в южном полушарии Марса неожиданно перерос в грандиозную планетарную бурю. Всего за несколько недель плотные облака пыли полностью затянули поверхность планеты, скрыв её знаменитые кратеры и долины от объективов космических аппаратов на долгие месяцы. Мы в МАХ 📲

5

8 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC82 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Идеальное выравнивание: Титан на фоне колец Сатурна 🪐 Космический аппарат Cassini запечатлел уникальный момент: крупнейший спутник Сатурна проплывает точно по плоскости колец планеты. Этот редкий ракурс подчеркивает тончайшую структуру ледяного кольцевого диска, который с такого расстояния кажется абсолютным лезвием, разрезающим космическое пространство. Мы в МАХ 📲

6

8 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC90 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вега: космическое «яйцо» в 25 световых годах от Земли 🌌 Пятая по яркости звезда ночного неба относится к спектральному классу А0 и превосходит Солнце по мощности свечения в 40 раз. Главная особенность Веги — бешеная скорость вращения на экватороиальной линии (236,2 км/с), из-за которой небесное тело сплюснуто с полюсов и имеет форму куриного яйца. Мы в МАХ 📲

5

8 Aug 2026, 06:04 UTC100 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Марсианские дюны под прицелом NASA 🛰 Орбитальный зонд MRO с помощью камеры HiRISE ведет круглогодичный мониторинг песчаных дюн Марса, фиксируя их сезонные трансформации. На новом снимке, сделанном с высоты почти 300 километров, запечатлены необычные круглые дюны в период, когда их поверхность покрывается тонким слоем зимнего льда. Мы в МАХ 📲

4

8 Aug 2026, 03:04 UTC99 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Космическая радиация: почему МКС летает «низко»? 🌍 Вокруг Земли на высоте от 4 000 до 17 000 км простираются радиационные пояса, опасные для всего живого. Именно поэтому орбита МКС сознательно ограничена безопасными 400 километрами. 🛰 Однако даже на этой высоте радиационный фон в сотни раз выше земного: за два дня на станции космонавты получают годовую дозу землянина. Мы в МАХ 📲

3

7 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC115 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

☢️ Сколько радиации получат космонавты по пути на Марс? Данные марсохода Curiosity показали, что за 8-месячный перелет к Красной планете экипаж столкнется с ощутимой, но не смертельной дозой излучения — около 2 миллизиверт в сутки. Суммарно за 350 дней миссии туда и обратно астронавты накопят менее 0,7 зиверта. Это укладывается в рамки современных норм безопасности, однако повышает риск развития онкологических забо

3🤯2

7 Aug 2026, 13:14 UTC113 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Что произойдет, если Луна подойдет к Земле вплотную? 🌌 Если наш спутник окажется на критически близком расстоянии, гравитация Земли просто разорвет его на куски. Мощнейшие приливные силы расколют лунную поверхность, превратив ее в гигантское кольцо обломков вокруг нашей планеты. Этот космический «взрыв» оставил бы потрясающее, но смертоносное зрелище на ночном небосводе. Мы в МАХ 📲

1

7 Aug 2026, 10:14 UTC110 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

Астероид 2023 DW: угрожает ли Земле удар в 2046 году? ☄️ NASA оценивает вероятность столкновения 57-метрового астероида с Землей 14 февраля 2046 года как 1 к 560. Несмотря на то, что этот показатель выше стандартных расчетов для подобных объектов, ученые призывают сохранять спокойствие: у человечества есть еще более двух десятилетий на точное отслеживание траектории небесного тела и разработку методов планетарной за

😁4🤔21🔥1😭1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @historywizard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Звёздный Атлас” (@historywizard), 1,271 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/historywizard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.