Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 香港扫楼一楼一【发利大厦榜单】

Channel

香港扫楼一楼一【发利大厦榜单】

@hkbg888

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

46,063subscribers

+9,630 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002670865005
TypeChannel
Username@hkbg888
Description广告合作联系 @HK_saolou_bot 全国搜索引擎 @sanhesousuo_123 香港聊天群组 @hk0858888 扫楼频道 https://t.me/+tdtrX_GD21MyNmZl 备用频道 https://t.me/+Z-LfvaQssvRiZGY1 深圳私约 https://t.me/+zrpuVngEI-gxZDM1 福利视频 https://t.me/+93-X5XQHac00NTg1 欢迎各地同胞,不歧视,不攀比,普通话粤语都可以交流
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held60
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hkbg888

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

36,32446,06341,193.57 August 2026 — 36,433 subscribers7 August 2026 — 36,433 subscribers8 August 2026 — 36,452 subscribers9 August 2026 — 36,541 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36,573 subscribers11 August 2026 — 36,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 36,324 subscribers13 August 2026 — 36,400 subscribers14 August 2026 — 41,697 subscribers16 August 2026 — 41,581 subscribers17 August 2026 — 41,331 subscribers18 August 2026 — 41,278 subscribers19 August 2026 — 41,329 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,103 subscribers21 August 2026 — 40,156 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,210 subscribers24 August 2026 — 40,387 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,376 subscribers26 August 2026 — 40,409 subscribers27 August 2026 — 40,558 subscribers28 August 2026 — 40,684 subscribers29 August 2026 — 40,678 subscribers30 August 2026 — 40,682 subscribers31 August 2026 — 40,758 subscribers1 September 2026 — 40,690 subscribers2 September 2026 — 40,725 subscribers4 September 2026 — 41,025 subscribers6 September 2026 — 41,259 subscribers10 September 2026 — 40,791 subscribers12 September 2026 — 40,686 subscribers13 September 2026 — 40,038 subscribers15 September 2026 — 39,838 subscribers17 September 2026 — 40,011 subscribers29 September 2026 — 40,649 subscribers5 October 2026 — 41,399 subscribers9 October 2026 — 41,908 subscribers13 October 2026 — 42,693 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,769 subscribers15 October 2026 — 42,829 subscribers16 October 2026 — 42,958 subscribers17 October 2026 — 43,068 subscribers18 October 2026 — 43,231 subscribers19 October 2026 — 43,500 subscribers21 October 2026 — 43,488 subscribers22 October 2026 — 43,564 subscribers23 October 2026 — 43,707 subscribers24 October 2026 — 43,700 subscribers25 October 2026 — 43,863 subscribers26 October 2026 — 43,986 subscribers27 October 2026 — 44,161 subscribers28 October 2026 — 44,399 subscribers29 October 2026 — 44,528 subscribers30 October 2026 — 44,613 subscribers31 October 2026 — 44,805 subscribers31 October 2026 — 44,974 subscribers1 November 2026 — 45,311 subscribers3 November 2026 — 45,590 subscribers3 November 2026 — 45,582 subscribers4 November 2026 — 45,856 subscribers6 November 2026 — 46,063 subscribers7 August 20266 November 2026
60 measurements spanning 90 days, net +9,630. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,863–47,524 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 60
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 02:1746,063+207
4 Nov 2026, 23:2945,856+274
3 Nov 2026, 22:1945,582-8
3 Nov 2026, 01:1145,590+279
1 Nov 2026, 23:3145,311+337
31 Oct 2026, 22:3644,974+169
31 Oct 2026, 00:3544,805+192
30 Oct 2026, 03:1744,613+85
29 Oct 2026, 06:2744,528+129
28 Oct 2026, 04:4044,399+238
27 Oct 2026, 01:0144,161+175
26 Oct 2026, 02:4943,986+123
25 Oct 2026, 05:2643,863+163
24 Oct 2026, 05:0843,700-7
23 Oct 2026, 05:5743,707+143
22 Oct 2026, 07:1643,564+76
21 Oct 2026, 04:0943,488-12
19 Oct 2026, 23:1143,500+269
18 Oct 2026, 22:0843,231+163
17 Oct 2026, 19:3143,068first reading

Engagement

1,270 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 287 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.71%
avg views ÷ 46,063 subscribers
Avg views / post
789
466 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.198%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
466
of 1,270 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 175 of 466 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held1,270 (6 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total367,672
Reactions total295
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
530
Videos
44
Links
265

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
7m 59s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

691 reactions across 301 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤50072.4%
👍12818.5%
😢91.30%
🥰91.30%
😁71.01%
😭71.01%
😱60.868%
🤩50.724%
🤣40.579%
🤬40.579%
👀30.434%
👌20.289%
😨20.289%
🥴20.289%
👏10.145%
😍10.145%
🥱10.145%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 389 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 691 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 27 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 65 of 466 posts held from the last 30 days (13.9%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 12:17 UTC423 viewsread 6 November 2026

#代出報告 #一仔包膠 2026.11.06 #FL 长腿御姐502i瑶瑶 等了两个星期看到瑶瑶发朋友圈回来了于是提前一天预约好时间,进门寒暄一会脱衣去洗澡,出来擦干,然后上床调情,口不叫停能一直口,舔蛋蛋技术感觉应该可以有进步的空间,女上起手,后入,再换回来的时候脚仔有滴软了,因为来之前刚从健身房回来,停停歇歇,瑶瑶都没有不耐烦,最后终于出水,陪洗溜溜走人 6+1环保

Signed PANDA CC

6 Nov 2026, 04:42 UTC922 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026

【深圳香港掃樓谷報告】 https://t.me/hkbg888 【學生留名】:爱哥 【出擊時間】:2026.11.5-晚上8点 【老師名字】:菜菜(长岛热茶) 【老師房間】:603A 【香港地區】:發利大廈 【出擊消費】:600+100 【顏值身材】:颜值99分(瓜子脸,清纯型),身材99分(170cm 52kg B胸长腿完美腰臀比) 【服務內容】:新婚之夜 【上課體驗】:朝思暮想的宝贝菜菜今天终于飞来香港,有句话说天上一天地上一年,等菜菜红休复出虽然只有短短10天,但我犹如等了十年(你知道我这十年是怎么过的吗?哈哈哈)。 言归正传,今天给菜菜带了一套红色性感睡衣,配上她的红色蕾丝腰开裆黑丝袜简直是极品尤物,菜菜说她今天像极了新婚夜的新娘子,我说那我就做最爱你的老公吧,此时此刻我已然把她当做我热恋多年的女友,情不自禁从脖子亲吻到了脚踝,她身上真的好香,那个味道居然是我最喜欢的,当亲吻她那毫无赘肉的小腹时,弟弟已…

❤6

Signed 深圳三和大神

6 Nov 2026, 04:36 UTC838 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026

太子 全新裝修 #神秘房 #神房 #SPA 「累了 就上來充個電⚡️」 近太子地鐵站 1分鐘 全新裝修 私隱度極高 獨立浴室🛀 一次性床單&毛巾 報告:@pepowerband2 10:30-2:30 後備預約號 @pepowerbank888 TG預約:@pepowerbank WhatsApp: https://api.whatsapp.com/send/?phone=85251747909 睇圖:@pepowerband https://t.me/pepowerband

Signed PANDA CC

6 Nov 2026, 04:35 UTC834 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#urbanreport 1)代號/tg名 : 充電寶 2) 地區 :PE 3) 囡名/編號 :露露 4) 家用:$700 ( 60分鐘) (建議75分鐘Plan) 5)相頭 - 8.5/10 剪短咗頭髮,好有味道,真人絕對夠入閘,對眼好似識放電咁。 6)身材 - 9/10 絕對係重點,真波大D杯,仲見到青筋,手感非常好,任玩咁搓,淺啡,乳暈適中,Lin頭十分之好啜,啜兩啜扯晒Lin𓄃起晒水,少毛修得整齊,靚鮑冇黑邊冇反唇,慢慢反開仲見到Pink,唔肥,好輕微嘅肉肉,唔算有肚腩,手腳Keep得幾靚,約165高,去到170就真係更完美,只係側身肋骨有少少公仔,好靚嘅一行字。 7)服務 - 9/10 夠專業,夠聽話,免破冰,淫底,好好玩冇冷場,近期佳作,黑馬之選! 食評: 開門見到真人算有驚喜,好好笑容好好傾,冇架子。間房整齊乾淨,慢慢除衫仲幫你除埋鞋,跟住一齊沖涼,氣氛十分之好,沖…

❤1

Signed PANDA CC

6 Nov 2026, 04:34 UTC773 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026

老鼠哥推介- 6/11 发利大厦 306C 小康华💎2 306D 北京宝宝 408A 小敏 最后今晚 501 5 妍妍💎 508 6脆脆鲨 最后今晚 603B 西子 603G 小七 605E 新幼晨晨 701G 初秋 706H 小丽 805A 小黑 807 9 御姐菲菲 💎为老鼠哥特別精选宝石级 尾后数字为三甲精选 记得说群內老鼠哥推介喔 纯个人意见

Signed PANDA CC

6 Nov 2026, 01:35 UTC884 viewsread 6 November 2026

FL702G小北服務唔錯,有波有籮,水簫波推深喉7舊已經有,性價比禦姐👍🏼

Signed PANDA CC

5 Nov 2026, 23:50 UTC984 views0 reactionsread 6 November 2026

11.06隊長在FL 306C小康華,👍👍 306D北京寶寶潮吹妹,👍👍2 306E新女*,👍 306F新女*,👍 501 5研研,👍👍3 508 6新女*,👍 603A模特菜菜,👍👍 603B少女西子,👍👍 603C大胸後生新女*,👍 603F御姐珊珊,👍👍 603G少女小七,明晚八時前,👍👍2 603H長腿兔兔 👍 607 1台灣妹,👍👍 702A新女*,👍 702B模特彤彤,👍👍 702C新女*,👍 702D新女*,👍 702E新女*,👍 702G大胸御姐小北,👍👍 702H小雨,👍 702K新女*,👍 703D笑笑,👍👍 703E🇯🇵AV女優星野愛佳,⭐️⭐️ 703F東北甜甜,👍 704E棉花糖,👍 705 1惠惠,👍 705 2新女*,👍 705 6小虎牙,👍 706A大眼妹,👍 706B🇯🇵新日本妹*,👍 706D河北小婷,👍👍 706E新女好看*,👍 707 1樂多,👍 707 2晴天,👍 707 3小雪,有口爆…

Signed PANDA CC

5 Nov 2026, 14:26 UTC≈1,250 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026

#一仔包膠 #代出报告 408A小敏 600+100環,加錢可其它 19碎左右,甜美鄰家小女孩,A胸,淡黑色B,毛多左小小但形狀細細的,(女上、抱操、站後入、床邊後入、男上、五式都包裹得緊緊的,還碰到東西),有小小生手,但由吹到做我請求的每個動作都很配合,叫床細細聲不叫時抓我小臂100%真實,事後聊家况日常+微信, (我唔樣衰,有禮+尊重㗎) 前幾日有位襟兄被她1分鐘秒了情有可原,望各位大哥斯文啲語言肢體溝通吖!

👍1

Signed PANDA CC

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,270 posts we hold for @hkbg888. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hkbg888 edited 62 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 151 posts on @hkbg888 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
45

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“香港扫楼一楼一【发利大厦榜单】” (@hkbg888), 46,063 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hkbg888.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.