Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
6 measurements spanning 59 days, net +17. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 70–93 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Oct 2026, 17:08
90
+1
30 Sept 2026, 19:58
89
+10
11 Sept 2026, 20:37
79
+5
27 Aug 2026, 11:58
74
+1
20 Aug 2026, 09:03
73
no change
20 Aug 2026, 01:31
73
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 31s
Average length
1m 31s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
76 reactions across 19 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
⚡
32
42.1%
💯
18
23.7%
👾
14
18.4%
🆒
11
14.5%
💊
1
1.32%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 76 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
احتمالا اسم Cicada 3301 رو شنیدید. یکی از بزرگترین معماهای اینترنت که سال ها مردم رو به حل کردن چالش ها و معماهاش مشغول کرد و در آخر هم یک علامت سوال بزرگ تو ذهن همه به جا گذاشت. با اینکه پرونده‌ی Cicada هنوز کامل بسته نشده و هنوز هم جامعه طرفداراش سعی میکنن معمای کتاب Liber Primus رو حل کنن، با این حال تصور میشه خالقان این طرح به هدفشون رسیدن و سال هاست دیگه پیامی منتشر نکردن.
تا دلتون بخواد از اینجور چیزا توی اینتر…
اگر شما هم میخواید توی ترمینالتون یه پت داشته باشید که توی خروجی دستورات بهتون کمک کنه، حرکت های بامزه دربیاره و بعد از ورود به ترمینال یه جمله‌ی بامزه بگه میتونید از این گربه‌ی مسخره استفاده کنید 😭
https://github.com/witboric/hoax-terminal
این نسخه‌ی اولیه‌ی برنامه ست، لطفاً اگر حین نصب به مشکل برخوردید حتما بگید که مشکل رو برطرف کنیم. و اگر ایده و نظری راجع به توسعه‌ش دارید خیلی خوشحال میشیم نظراتتون رو بشنویم!
🎤 قسمت نهم پادکست فانوس منتشر شد | پایان فصل «پشتِ صحنهٔ صفر و یک»
🎙گویندگان:
مریم شریفیان
پریسان پری رخ
در طول این فصل، هر بار پای صحبت یکی از اجزای کامپیوتر نشستیم؛ از CPU و SSD گرفته تا RAM، Cache، Kernel و Scheduler.
اما این بار، همه‌چیز از یک کلیک ساده شروع می‌شود...
در این قسمت، مسیر اجرای یک دستور را از لحظه‌ی کلیک روی یک برنامه تا نمایش آن روی صفحه دنبال می‌کنیم و می‌بینیم هر یک از اجزای سیستم چگونه در کنار …
🎙 توی اپیزود پنجم Hoax Cast رفتیم سراغ یکی از دیوونه‌کننده ترین موضوعات مرز علم و فلسفه!
آپلود مغز و جاودانگی دیجیتال
یا (Mind Uploading)🔥
توی این اپیزود درباره این موضوعات صحبت کردیم:
📌 چطوری میشه ۸۶ میلیارد نورون مغز رو به صفر و یک تبدیل کرد؟
📌 داستان واقعی رباتِ لگویی که مغز یک کرم رو روش نصب کردن!
📌 پارادوکس هولناک هویت: آیا نسخه کپی‌شده واقعاً «خودِ شماست» یا فقط یک هوش مصنوعی کپی‌کاره؟
📌 آینده دنیایی که آدم…
🧠 آیا آخرین نسلی هستیم که «مجبوره» بمیره؟!
تصور کنید روزی برسه که دیگه مرگ پایان راه نباشه ..
روزی که بشه تمام خاطرات، شخصیت و آگاهی شما رو روی یک چیپ سیلیکونی کپی کرد و تا ابد توی دنیای دیجیتال زنده موند!
به زودی شنونده اپیزود پنجم پادکست Hoax Cast خواهید بود!🎉
Winsock Catalog چیه؟
و چرا گاهی باعث قطعی اینترنت میشه؟
اگه تا حالا بعد از حذف یه آنتی‌ویروس یا VPN با این مشکل مواجه شدید که ناگهان اینترنت قطع شده ، در حالی که Wi-Fi وصله، IP هم درسته، ولی هیچ سایتی باز نمیشه ، احتمالاً مقصر Winsock Catalog هست که خراب شده. بیایید ببینیم این چیه و چطور درستش کنیم؟
Winsock مخفف Windows Sockets
یک لایه‌ی نرم‌افزاری تو ویندوزه که بین سیستم‌عامل و شبکه (اینترنت یا شبکه محلی) قرار م…
چقدر از تصمیمایی که روزمره می‌گیریم واقعاً مال خودمونه؟ 🧠
در اپیزود چهارم Hoax Cast رفتیم سراغ یکی از پیچیده‌ترین و تاریک‌ترین موضوعات دنیای دیجیتال: هک کردن مغز انسان با سیگنال‌های پنهان!
توی این اپیزود بررسی کردیم که الگوریتم‌ها چطور بدون اینکه بفهمیم، روی عواطف، تصمیم‌گیری‌ها و افکار ناخودآگاه ما تأثیر می‌ذارن و مسیر ذهنمون رو تغییر می‌دن.
🎙 متن، صدا و تنظیم ••
👁 پریسان پری‌رخ
📌 #BrainHacking #تکنولوژی #…
🎧🎙 | اپیزود سوم:
بزرگراه دیوانه، توهم امنیت در برابر BGP
•🖱.. تا حالا به این فکر کردید که چطور میشه کل ترافیک اینترنت یک کشور یا یک شرکت بزرگ رو بدون اینکه کسی بفهمه، دزدید؟🏃🏻♂
🔍 پروتکل BGP که به عنوان ستون فقرات و بزرگراه اصلی انتقال داده در اینترنت شناخته میشه، از همه‌ی ما می‌خواد که به همدیگه «اعتماد» کنیم.
اما وقتی پای اعتماد وسط باشه، همیشه جای خالی برای کلاهبردارها و هکرها هم باز میشه!
🗞 در این اپیزود رفت…
⚡6👾2
Signed Rooy
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hoax10001. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HOAX” (@hoax10001), 90 subscribers as measured 17 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoax10001.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
