Growth
Growth history is still building. We hold one measurement for this entry. A trend needs at least two, taken days apart — so this will fill in on its own rather than being estimated. We do not publish numbers we have not measured.
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 21 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 0.767%
- avg views ÷ 9,232 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 70.8
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 7.42%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈744
- Videos
- ≈71
- Links
- ≈1,410
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
105 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 105 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 August 2026 to 14 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
14 Sept 2026, 09:39 UTC20 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 Weekly Crypto Digest:
> MoneyGram launches a stablecoin-backed Visa card on Stellar
> Solana hits 263K+ token launches in one day
> Nasdaq invests $100M in Kraken parent Payward
Gainers: $STONK, $VVV, $BTR, $FF, $RAY
TradFi and crypto keep moving closer together.
🔗 Full digest
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
🔥3❤2👍2
11 Sept 2026, 14:13 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 Former Ripple CTO David Schwartz says $XRP could eventually flip Bitcoin.
But the math shows how massive the gap still is:
$BTC market cap: ~$1.55T
$XRP market cap: ~$84.8B
Bitcoin is ~18x larger
$XRP would need to reach ~$24.60 just to match BTC’s current market cap
Schwartz isn’t predicting Bitcoin will collapse — he thinks XRP could simply grow faster.
Could $XRP ever actually flip $BTC?
👉 Read more
@hodl_…
🔥3❤1👍1
10 Sept 2026, 15:08 UTC48 views4 reactionsread 16 September 2026 Photo
🇺🇸 Spot Crypto ETF Flows: ETH, SOL and XRP spot ETFs saw net inflows on Sept. 8, while BTC spot ETFs saw net outflows.
$BTC: -$120.24M
$ETH: $34.75M
$SOL: $11.73M
$XRP: $12.29M
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
👍2❤1🔥1
10 Sept 2026, 12:12 UTC50 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 NVIDIA and Palantir are bringing AI directly into NVIDIA’s own supply chain.
The new stack combines NVIDIA’s Nemotron models with Palantir’s Foundry and Ontology to optimize how millions of components move from suppliers to finished AI systems.
The results are wild:
Base Nemotron: 17.5% accuracy
Nemotron 3 Ultra: 55.5%
Specialized Nemotron: 86.7%
A smaller, specialized AI model just crushed a much larger genera…
🔥4👍2👏1
9 Sept 2026, 13:32 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 Charlie Lee launched Litecoin in 2011 — just two years after Bitcoin.
Since then, $LTC has:
Survived every crypto market cycle
Had zero permanent network outages
Activated SegWit before Bitcoin
Grown into one of crypto’s oldest active networks
And in 2017, Lee sold or donated nearly all of his personal $LTC to eliminate conflicts of interest.
14 years later, he’s still involved with Litecoin.
Here’s the story …
❤2👍2🔥2
8 Sept 2026, 09:32 UTC48 views5 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 Vitalik Buterin is betting AI won’t break Bitcoin.
Investor Liron Shapira gave a 50% chance that AI could cause $BTC to crash 50%+ within two years.
Vitalik is taking “the opposite side”, with roughly 90% of his net worth riding on it through $ETH
🪙 Read more
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
🔥2😁2👍1
7 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC47 views6 reactionsread 16 September 2026 Photo
🇺🇸 Weekly Crypto ETF Flows: BTC, ETH, SOL and XRP spot ETFs saw net inflows last week.
$BTC: $986.85M
$ETH: $218.41M
$SOL: $6.18M
$XRP: $18.96M
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
👍4❤2
7 Sept 2026, 10:39 UTC56 views7 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🗞️ Weekly Crypto Digest:
> Standard Chartered launches spot $BTC & $ETH trading for institutions in the UAE
> Coinbase launches regulated crypto derivatives in Canada with up to 10x leverage
> Sui Network-based Full Sail shuts down after the Switchboard oracle exploit
$PONS led the market with a massive +456% weekly gain
👉 Full digest
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
❤3👍2🔥2
4 Sept 2026, 15:36 UTC72 views5 reactionsread 16 September 2026 🚨 Polymarket just launched perpetual futures with up to 20x leverage
67 markets are live across crypto, stocks, commodities and indices.
Day 1 volume hit ~$73M:
$ETH — $9M
$BTC — $7M
Gold — $5M
$ONDO — $4M
Traders can even go long or short SpaceX, Samsung, oil, the S&P 500 and $FARTCOIN. Prediction market or everything exchange?
👉 Read more
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
👍3❤2
3 Sept 2026, 18:47 UTC69 views2 reactionsread 16 September 2026 Photo
🇺🇸 Spot Crypto ETF Flows: BTC spot ETFs saw net inflows on Sept. 2, while ETH, SOL and XRP spot ETFs saw net outflows.
$BTC: $101.15M
$ETH: -$48.08M
$SOL: -$6.13M
$XRP: -$7.2M
$HYPE: $0
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
❤1👍1
2 Sept 2026, 15:29 UTC75 views4 reactionsread 16 September 2026 Photo
🇺🇸 Spot Crypto ETF Flows: ETH, SOL and XRP spot ETFs saw net inflows on Sept. 1, while BTC spot ETFs saw net outflows.
$BTC: - $236.46M
$ETH: $10.95M
$SOL: $10.19M
$XRP: $14.38M
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
❤2👍1👏1
2 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC72 views3 reactionsread 16 September 2026 Photo
🚨 THIS TRADER TURNED $21K INTO $8.1 MILLION
Over the past 2 months, DumbCrayonEater accumulated 29.32M $AI for just $21.2K.
Today, that position is worth $8.13M, making him the largest $AI holder.
Unrealized profit: $8.11M Return: 382x.
One trade. Two months. $8M+ in profit.
@hodl_fm
News | X | Instagram
👍1👏1🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hodl_fm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Olan's Inner Circle
@olansalpha · 24,474
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 37 here — alongside 36 others — read 16 September 2026 This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Hodl FM” (@hodl_fm), 9,232 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hodl_fm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.