Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Cryptohopium

Channel

Cryptohopium

@hodljusthodl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

906subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001212027040
TypeChannel
Username@hodljusthodl
Created7 August 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hodljusthodl

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

906915910.56 August 2026 — 913 subscribers6 August 2026 — 913 subscribers12 August 2026 — 915 subscribers19 August 2026 — 914 subscribers26 August 2026 — 912 subscribers11 September 2026 — 906 subscribers6 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 36 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 905–916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 04:35906-6
26 Aug 2026, 15:05912-2
19 Aug 2026, 19:18914-1
12 Aug 2026, 15:06915+2
6 Aug 2026, 14:07913no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:24913first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

230 reactions across 20 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12152.6%
🔥3013.0%
❤2611.3%
😁187.83%
🤝93.91%
💯83.48%
💩31.30%
🗿31.30%
⚡20.87%
🐳20.87%
👏20.87%
🤔20.87%
👌10.435%
🤡10.435%
🤮10.435%
🥱10.435%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 230 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hodljusthodl. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 17 June 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 11:42 UTC123 views13 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ни одного "настоящего биткоинера" 😅 Даже у анонимного говномёта нет биткоин-аппаратника? Или ты щедр только на какахи с 3х акков, а голос зажопил? 🙃 Результаты опроса опять удивляют. Из положительного – доля Trezor стала заметно выше, чем несколько лет назад. Из отрицательного – каждый второй юзает аппаратник с закрытым кодом... Вообще неудивительно, что это самые популярные девайсы в мире. Ledger сделали стильное…

❤7👍5🤮1

2 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC162 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Posted without readable text

👍12❤3💩3👌1🤡1

28 Jul 2026, 22:03 UTC212 views15 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Работаю над вторым постом серии #КтоМыВообще Он получился настолько большим, что решил отдельно выложить блок с этим видео, которое большинство из вас уже видели, ведь это одно из самых известных научных видео в интернете. Оно настолько сюрреалистичное, что многие думают, что это фейк. Но это строгая научная анимация, основанная на реальных данных о строении и механике кинезина – одного из молекулярных "курьеров" к…

👍10🔥5

24 Jul 2026, 17:52 UTC338 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Китайцы показали робособаку, от которой никто не сможет убежать. Робот доставляет груз (может носить до 180 кг!) куда угодно за 30 км по сложному ландшафту. Кибер-псина уверенно носится по лестницам, карабкается вверх по отвесным скалам и преодалевает ручьи. Не ждём, а готовимся?

🔥5😁3👍1

21 Jul 2026, 11:20 UTC319 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Мои акции выросли на 10%. — Поздравляю! Это облагается налогом. — Но инфляция была 8%. Я на самом деле выиграл всего 2%. — Мы облагаем налогом все 10%. — Вы облагаете налогом инфляцию, которую сами создали? — Прирост капитала — это прирост капитала. — Значит, вы получаете прибыль от двукратного обесценивания моих денег? — Вы не экономист.

👍8😁7🔥4

10 Jul 2026, 16:18 UTC374 views14 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Может это всё большой спектакль для хомяков? 🙃 Немецкий гигант Deutsche Börse вложил $200 млн в Kraken. Сделка стала одной из крупнейших инвестиций традиционного рынка в криптоиндустрию. Samsung перебила рекорд, вложив ~$408 млн в крупнейшую криптобиржу Южной Кореи Upbit. К слову, южнокорейская вона входит в топ-3 валют торгов с криптой, часто обгоняя евро и уступая только $. Крупнейшие компании США ищут сотрудник…

👍7🔥4🐳2🤔1

9 Jul 2026, 14:52 UTC375 views20 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Удивляют такие результаты опроса. Считай 25% вне рынка на дне (ну или очень близко к нему). И это из тех, кто вообще остался на канале 👆 Смывает людей стабильно весь год, всё падение. Уверен, среди отписавшихся доля ноукоинеров обидевшихся на рынок преобладает. Респект тем, кто остался. Хотя это далеко не самое злое падение в истории Биткоина. Но как видим и этого оказалось достаточно, чтобы отсеять залётных халявщи…

👍10🤝7💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hodljusthodl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Cryptohopium” (@hodljusthodl), 906 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hodljusthodl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.