Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for اتحاد سرمایه گذاران ریحان تاک

Channel

اتحاد سرمایه گذاران ریحان تاک

@holdingtaak

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,162subscribers

-227 since we began measuring on 28 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001915503228
TypeChannel
Username@holdingtaak
Description#مطالبه_گری #طبق_آخرین_قرارداد_به_نرخ_روز
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded28 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held40
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/holdingtaak

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

11,16211,44711,304.528 August 2026 — 11,389 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,389 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,390 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,381 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,377 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,373 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,367 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,366 subscribers6 September 2026 — 11,447 subscribers9 September 2026 — 11,426 subscribers11 September 2026 — 11,406 subscribers13 September 2026 — 11,399 subscribers15 September 2026 — 11,396 subscribers17 September 2026 — 11,391 subscribers19 September 2026 — 11,374 subscribers26 September 2026 — 11,337 subscribers4 October 2026 — 11,305 subscribers9 October 2026 — 11,280 subscribers13 October 2026 — 11,256 subscribers14 October 2026 — 11,246 subscribers15 October 2026 — 11,244 subscribers16 October 2026 — 11,236 subscribers17 October 2026 — 11,233 subscribers19 October 2026 — 11,230 subscribers20 October 2026 — 11,229 subscribers21 October 2026 — 11,220 subscribers22 October 2026 — 11,214 subscribers23 October 2026 — 11,210 subscribers24 October 2026 — 11,198 subscribers25 October 2026 — 11,193 subscribers26 October 2026 — 11,187 subscribers27 October 2026 — 11,183 subscribers28 October 2026 — 11,181 subscribers29 October 2026 — 11,174 subscribers30 October 2026 — 11,170 subscribers31 October 2026 — 11,166 subscribers1 November 2026 — 11,164 subscribers2 November 2026 — 11,162 subscribers3 November 2026 — 11,164 subscribers4 November 2026 — 11,162 subscribers28 August 20264 November 2026
40 measurements spanning 68 days, net -227. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,119–11,490 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 05:2711,162-2
3 Nov 2026, 05:1911,164+2
2 Nov 2026, 05:2011,162-2
1 Nov 2026, 04:4011,164-2
31 Oct 2026, 06:2811,166-4
30 Oct 2026, 04:4611,170-4
29 Oct 2026, 08:0911,174-7
28 Oct 2026, 04:4711,181-2
27 Oct 2026, 03:2611,183-4
26 Oct 2026, 06:2611,187-6
25 Oct 2026, 06:3911,193-5
24 Oct 2026, 09:0511,198-12
23 Oct 2026, 09:4511,210-4
22 Oct 2026, 08:3911,214-6
21 Oct 2026, 03:5011,220-9
20 Oct 2026, 03:1011,229-1
19 Oct 2026, 01:4711,230-3
17 Oct 2026, 22:4511,233-3
16 Oct 2026, 19:4611,236-8
15 Oct 2026, 21:3711,244first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 18 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 12 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.8%
avg views ÷ 11,162 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,880
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.15%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 November 2026
Posts held71 (18 August 2026 – 2 November 2026)
Views total73,760
Reactions total1,589
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 19:34 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
728
Videos
552
Links
228

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 30s
Average length
50s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

5,260 reactions across 67 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2,81853.6%
🔥62912.0%
👏4919.33%
👎3827.26%
🤝3687.00%
💯2244.26%
❤1773.37%
💔1693.21%
👌10.019%
🙏10.019%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 67 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,260 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 18 August 2026 to 2 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (15.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

2 Nov 2026, 04:19 UTC≈2,140 views122 reactionsread 4 November 2026

خدا نگذرد از شما قوه قضائیه که این پرونده شامل دزدی، غارت اموال، مفت‌فروشی، تهاتر مخفیانه و هزار کثافت‌کاری دیگر داشت. در واقع، خیانت بزرگی علیه سرمایه‌گذاران انجام دادید.

🔥68👍27👏11💔6👎5💯3❤2

31 Oct 2026, 10:36 UTC≈2,600 views47 reactionsread 4 November 2026

هزار بار گفتم نذارید اموال را مفت بفروشند، نتیجه ش شده این 👆👆👆👆

💔33👎11🔥2❤1

31 Oct 2026, 10:32 UTC≈2,900 views55 reactionsread 4 November 2026

یکی از خریداران مزایدات از اموال توقیفی ۳۰ میلیارد سود کرده و سودش را گذاشته است بانک و با این کار ماهانه ۶۶۰ میلیون سود می‌گیرد از بانک این است که بعضی‌ها گفتند اموال را بفروشند؛ یعنی همین.

🔥43👎11❤1

29 Oct 2026, 13:47 UTC≈4,300 views142 reactionsread 4 November 2026

اجرای احکام حرام‌زاده قزوین؛ تا توانست اموال توقیفی را به قیمت پایین فروخت تا سودهای کلانی از اموال ببرند. حدود ۴ هزار میلیارد تومان سود از اموال کردند و این سودها را به جیب زدند و به ریش من و شما خندیدند. لعنت به مسئولین خیانت‌کار

🔥93👍19👏17👎10💔2❤1

29 Oct 2026, 13:44 UTC≈3,800 views60 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥40👍13👎6❤1

29 Oct 2026, 10:42 UTC≈3,710 views46 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

وقتی میگیم مملکت صاحب نداره یعنی این، خودرو هر روز ۴۰۰ میلیون افزایش دارد

🔥31👍9👎6

29 Oct 2026, 04:44 UTC≈3,830 views60 reactionsread 4 November 2026

در زمان جنگ و نبود اینترنت به مدت ۳ ماه که همه درگیر جنگ و همه نگاه‌ها به جنگ بود و سرمایه‌گذاران از پرونده رضایت خودرو بی‌اطلاع بودند، کلی اموال از سردخانه و کارخانجات غارت و سرقت شد، بدون اینکه قوه قضائیه از آن بویی ببرد.

🔥45👎9👍6

28 Oct 2026, 16:53 UTC≈3,880 views90 reactionsread 4 November 2026

اجرای احکام خیانت کار قزوین حدود ۸۴ خودروی وارداتی و صادراتی را به قیمت مفت فروختند، در حالی که قیمت هر خودروی صادراتی ۳ تا ۵ میلیارد تومان و هر خودروی وارداتی ۱۰ تا ۲۰ میلیارد تومان افزایش داشته است. این موضوع نشان می‌دهد که قوه فقط از طریق خودروها حدود ۱ همت ( ۱۰۰۰ میلیارد تومان) ضرر به سرمایه‌گذاران وارد کرده است.

🔥51👍27❤6👎6

27 Oct 2026, 19:33 UTC≈3,740 views188 reactionsread 4 November 2026

درود برهمه خوبان دوستان دنبال سهام و قدرالسهم نباشین چون دوسه سال هم درگیر ارزش گذاری و پذیره نویسی و...‌‌.. میشیم و بی فایده هست بنده مخالف تجمع جلوی کارخونه هستم چون یه مشتری داره پسند هم کرده و همه چی هم اوکی هست و چندین جلسه هم داشته با مسئولین قضایی قزوین فقط پولش جفت و جور نیس ورفته ملک هاشو نقد کنه و اگر اتفاق خاصی نیوفته(جنگ و....)بصورت نقد میخره از طرفی هم اجرای احکام شونزدهم همین ماه طبق قانون کارخونه و س…

👍150❤22👎15👌1

27 Oct 2026, 19:32 UTC≈3,510 views76 reactionsread 4 November 2026

درود و شب بخیر با توجه به شرایط پیش آمده و مزایده کارخانه و سردخانه تجمع جلوی درب کارخانه فعلاً کنسل می‌شود اما دستگاه قضایی بداند اگر این بار هم قرار باشد در فروش مردم بازی بخورند در اولین فرصت تجمع را اعلام می‌کنیم

🤝51👍19👎6

26 Oct 2026, 07:08 UTC≈2,250 views82 reactionsread 4 November 2026

(هیچ کس نمیتواند شما را شکست دهد مگر این که به خودتان ببازید) 💥گردهمایی عظیم تمامی سرمایه گذاران ریحان تاک💥 💥حق خواهی و مطالبه گری طبق آخرین قرارداد💥 زمان: جمعه ۸ آبان ماه مکان: تاکستان_صنعت هشتم_شرکت شیرین نوش صبا تاک ساعت: 16:00 کلیه سرمایه گذاران محترم ریحان تاک در این گردهمایی عظیم حضور داشته باشید #همه_می_آئیم #حق_خواهی_طبق_آخرین_قرارداد #اتحاد_سرمایه_گذاران_ریحان_تاک

🤝48👎26❤3👍3🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @holdingtaak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @holdingtaak as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
29 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
31 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
2 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

اخبار قزوین
@Qazvin · 43,587
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
▪️ کانال قزوینی ها ▪️
@Qazviniha · 45,375
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 28 August 2026
کانال خبر ابهر
@khabar_abhar · 24,084
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“اتحاد سرمایه گذاران ریحان تاک” (@holdingtaak), 11,162 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/holdingtaak.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.