Channel
@hollowgirlnd
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,638subscribers
+45 since we began measuring on 10 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001979157316 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hollowgirlnd |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hollowgirlnd |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 16:39 | 2,638 | -6 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 2,644 | +2 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:16 | 2,642 | +49 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 00:22 | 2,593 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 30 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 16 (30 August 2026 – 7 September 2026) |
| Views total | 30,630 |
| Reactions total | 609 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
609 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5438562442332378808 | 239 | 39.2% | |
| custom 5379895766049365057 | 211 | 34.6% | |
| custom 5334519324897979587 | 113 | 18.6% | |
| custom 5438306470871468493 | 46 | 7.55% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 609 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 30 August 2026 to 7 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hollowgirlnd. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 August 2026 to 7 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
укол от столбняка ощущается как пулевое ранение. у меня отнимается рука и болит лопатка я ща решила потрогать место укола а там так больно!!! оч сильно и я нажала туда и мне прострелило все тело как будто по голове молотком ударило ужас просто я выживу?
custom 543856244233237880812custom 53345193248979795875custom 54383064708714684934
почему это плохая идея если у вас не идет че то и вы бросите, то чем больше будет ваш простой тем сложнее будет вернуться. бросить можно только с условием что вернешься через неск часов или завтра к этому. я в этом уверена просто как ни в чем. проверено на всех занятиях. если у вас че то не получается, вам просто надо делать и учиться принимать посредственный результат по началу. в случае блогинга: лучше запостит…
custom 543856244233237880817custom 53798957660493650576
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 543856244233237880811custom 53345193248979795875custom 53798957660493650574custom 54383064708714684932
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53798957660493650579custom 54385624423323788086custom 53345193248979795874
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53798957660493650579custom 53345193248979795875custom 54385624423323788083
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 537989576604936505710custom 53345193248979795876custom 54385624423323788084
думаю щас любой дурак знаком с концепцией параллельных вселенных и что время не линейно или его вообще не существует я хз. ну вот эта квантовая физика о которой я не могу нормально рассуждать.. квантовое бессмертие вот это вот, мне нравится очень идея, я не хочу умирать в общем я постоянно стала испытывать дежавю. и не понимаю я: то ли я проживала это реально там где-то уже, но если параллельные миры, то че они не …
custom 533451932489797958722custom 537989576604936505712custom 54385624423323788086
ходила на космоскоу все последние годы чем дальше тем больше разочарования в выставках дома наконец то я осталась довольна
custom 543856244233237880816custom 53798957660493650572
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 543856244233237880828custom 537989576604936505713custom 53345193248979795873
Video, posted without a caption
custom 543830647087146849316custom 53345193248979795879custom 53798957660493650572
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 537989576604936505738custom 543830647087146849314custom 533451932489797958711custom 54385624423323788082
всегда было пофиг на это, но щас захотелось. нормальные цвета. я все еще не понимаю как можно было сделать один цветной телефон в линейке ОРАНЖЕВЫЙ худший цвет на земле я его ненавижу меня от него тошнит. кстати я училась в оранжевом универе, там были оранжевые стены и пол. кто-то угадает в каком?
custom 543856244233237880831custom 53345193248979795877custom 53798957660493650574
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hollowgirlnd. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Реабилитация на дому 🧌” (@hollowgirlnd), 2,638 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hollowgirlnd.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.