Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -327. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,417–6,844 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 11:55
6,466
-32
14 Sept 2026, 12:37
6,498
-52
10 Sept 2026, 15:57
6,550
-58
5 Sept 2026, 14:58
6,608
-36
2 Sept 2026, 02:32
6,644
-46
30 Aug 2026, 09:06
6,690
-24
27 Aug 2026, 11:34
6,714
-29
24 Aug 2026, 08:58
6,743
-28
20 Aug 2026, 12:26
6,771
-24
17 Aug 2026, 14:37
6,795
+2
14 Aug 2026, 14:48
6,793
+9
11 Aug 2026, 09:23
6,784
-8
8 Aug 2026, 13:33
6,792
-1
7 Aug 2026, 15:16
6,793
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 16s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,145 reactions across 26 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,521
48.4%
👍
580
18.4%
🤬
284
9.03%
🔥
148
4.71%
🤣
92
2.93%
🤯
91
2.89%
❤🔥
80
2.54%
👏
65
2.07%
🥰
40
1.27%
💘
36
1.14%
🍌
33
1.05%
😍
30
0.954%
😁
26
0.827%
🙉
20
0.636%
💊
15
0.477%
🤷♂
12
0.382%
👾
10
0.318%
😘
7
0.223%
😭
7
0.223%
🌚
6
0.191%
12 further kinds
42
1.34%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,145 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Исправили известные баги, починили вход с всех регионов, чуть залил фиксов ач, исправили ложные кики с новой версии, но советую играть с более старых версий, это касается не только нашего сервера (разработчикам игры спасибо) 🧐
Креаторки и сф за баги выдадим скорее всего вечером, когда закончим всё что осталось 🤯
Усиленно заняться ач (фиксануть проблемы, добавить еще пару детектов и тд)45%
Заняться усиленно обновлением (Сделаю следующий вайп прям масштабным)65%
Предложу свой вариант в комментах6%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Вайп успешно прошёл. Записал для себя моменты где можно еще увеличить производительность и улучшить пару моментов во время вайпа.
Так же хочу напомнить что в этом вайпе не сбрасывались скиллы 🤯
Ребят, хотим полностью переработать лут во всех ивентах, поэтому очень нужны ваши идеи 🤯
Закидывайте их в основной дс, в чат 「💡・идеи-на-вайп」. Пишите, какой лут вы хотели бы видеть в ивентах. Можно просто расписать свои идеи, а можно собрать пример на сервере у себя в сундуках и отправить скрины или видео.
Также ищу уже какой месяц действительно интересную идею для вечного ивента, который будет постоянно респавнить с…
1. Для теста вернём кое-кого, только в этот раз с более качественными анимациями 😛
2. Напоминаю, для игроков из рф доступен айпи с лучшим пингом: 194.93.2.254 , порт 19132 (через дефолтный айпи так же должно кидать)
3. Также напоминаю, что скиллы сбрасываются раз в 2 вайпа, поэтому в следующем вайпе весь ваш прогресс сохранится 😮
4. Добавили новую категорию в тикетах «Оспорить ЧСП (5.0)». Там вы сможете попробовать в…
Всем привет 😛
Спустя некоторое время нам наконец удалось исправить проблему со входом из рф, теперь всё должно буквально летать. Многие уже успели это заметить, так как видел, что создавали тикеты и удивлялись пингу в районе 20-60 мс из рф.
Так что, пока ркн снова не вставил палки в колёса, самое время зайти и поиграть 🙂
Если у вас не заходит через основной домен, попробуйте подключиться по айпи: 194.93.2.254 порт 1…
Всем привет, исправил вход 🧐
А также потихоньку продолжаем заниматься античитом: добавляем новые детекты, исправляем ложные срабатывания и закрываем различные обходы. Идей еще очень много, поэтому работа не останавливается.
Сейчас самая большая помощь для нас - это ваши репорты. Если знаете о каких-либо багах с античитом, обязательно кидайте их в дс в канал 「баги-и-недоработки」. За каждый новый найденный баг будем в…
❤47🔥15😍7🤬5💋3
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @hon9xx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Усиленно заняться ач (фиксануть проблемы, добавить еще пару детектов и тд)45%
Заняться усиленно обновлением (Сделаю следующий вайп прям масштабным)65%
Предложу свой вариант в комментах6%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Домик Хоникса 🖤” (@hon9xx), 6,466 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hon9xx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.