💫💫💫💫💫💫 прошла на Анимау! ЖДЕМ С НЕТЕРПЕНИЕМ!!!❤️
❤🔥11🍓5custom 52197191569281067455

Channel
@hon_coser
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
408subscribers
+15 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001759566302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hon_coser |
| Created | 15 October 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hon_coser |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 408 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 12:40 | 411 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 410 | +5 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 22:49 | 405 | +9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:27 | 396 | +2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:21 | 394 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 393 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 393 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
410 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 126 | 30.7% | |
| 🍓 | 87 | 21.2% | |
| 🔥 | 67 | 16.3% | |
| custom 5350378796581141291 | 45 | 11.0% | |
| custom 5368827532248382191 | 40 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5219719156928106745 | 21 | 5.12% | |
| 🤔 | 10 | 2.44% | |
| 💔 | 8 | 1.95% | |
| custom 5273863713684730031 | 6 | 1.46% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 410 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💫💫💫💫💫💫 прошла на Анимау! ЖДЕМ С НЕТЕРПЕНИЕМ!!!❤️
❤🔥11🍓5custom 52197191569281067455
Доп инфа к парику⬆️⬆️⬆️ Его вес всего составляет ~400-500 грамм. Башка не улетает 🌞
custom 52197191569281067454🍓3
Noerde Hew Amozo 💫 | Gachiakuta💫💫 Залетаю в Гачу жестко и без смазки Удивительно, но парик на Нёрдэ был сделан в общей сумме за 3 дня, если считать часы - то еще меньше 👍 Собирался из обычной базы лейсфронта и доп. канеколона Длина хвоста этой дамы составляет около 120 см ——— #wig
❤🔥14🔥7💔5🍓2custom 52197191569281067451
🍓 Была бы супер рада сгонять на такую патичку, но увы, отпуск у меня не вечный и в сентябре уже сгонять никуда не получится🥺 Вообще очень хочу приехать на фесты/пати в Мск и Спб, приятно отдохнуть и познакомиться с клевыми ребятами🤩
custom 53503787965811412916🍓4custom 52738637136847300313
🍓 Сейчас из спойлеров это мои бесконечные косплейные будни Поэтому ловите процесс обувки Августа💫
🍓12❤🔥4custom 52738637136847300313
🍓 Мяяя, спасибочки большоеее!! Приятности🤩🤩 🍓 Да, я буду на Гикконе!! Небольшой спойлер, хотим компанией погулять в кошкоскваде😍
❤🔥7🍓1
Сейчас я очень занята созданием костюмов и париков, поэтому предлагаю поболтать и ваще хочу поотвечать на вопросы 😊 https://t.me/askrubot?start=1403766562
🔥11custom 521971915692810674511custom 53688275322483821918🍓2
Posted without readable text
🔥18❤🔥10custom 53503787965811412918🍓4
Ура с днем мусорных тварей! Дефиле сделано на чистом вайбе и кринже, всем приходить на Азию и смотреть🗑🤩
❤🔥16🔥9
Быстренько сделала комфортика Гриса ——— #wig
🔥19❤🔥6🍓6custom 53503787965811412912
Дошиваемся и ловим такой вайб🤪 #HONcosplay
🍓17custom 536882753224838219110❤🔥9
Я уже нинавижу этааа!! Для меня шитье это моральный ущерб чесслово Но уже большая часть готова, осталось чуть-чуть!!
custom 536882753224838219118❤🔥17custom 53503787965811412919🔥3🍓1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hon_coser. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“HON.PОЗER” (@hon_coser), 408 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hon_coser.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.