در حال تست هستش🌹

Channel
فارغ از چارت
@honchoshow
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,916subscribers
+33 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001731267677 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @honchoshow |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/honchoshow |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:22 | 7,916 | -25 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:03 | 7,941 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 17:24 | 7,953 | -3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 10:37 | 7,956 | +97 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:56 | 7,859 | -17 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 7,876 | -22 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 7,898 | +18 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:57 | 7,880 | +14 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:51 | 7,866 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:23 | 7,882 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:30 | 7,883 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:22 | 7,883 | first reading |
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 27 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.0%
- avg views ÷ 7,916 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,590
- 39 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 42
- of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 66 (27 July 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 61,827 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 28 Aug 2026, 20:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 41s
- Average length
- 1m 34s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 2
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 63 we hold a reading for · 2%
- Most on one post
- 2
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @honchoshow. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 66 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
⏰ 5 دقیقه تا انتشار خبر : Fed Chairman Warsh Speaks🇺🇸 🔹 اهمیت خبر :🔴 ------------------------------------------- Prelim Benchmark Payrolls Revision🇺🇸 🔹 اهمیت خبر :🔴 ------------------------------------------- Revised UoM Consumer Sentiment🇺🇸 🔹 اهمیت خبر :🟠 ------------------------------------------- Revised UoM Inflation Expectations🇺🇸 🔹 اهمیت خبر :🟠 ------------------------------------------- @Fundcho
#فارغازچارت مشکل از استراتژی تو نیست، از اون لحظهایه که استاپ میخوره و تو به جای بستن چارت، شروع میکنی به دنبال دلیل گشتن. این دقیقاً همون شکاف بین یه تریدر سودده و یه تریدر درجازنندهست. تریدرهای بازنده بعد از ضرر میپرسن «چرا این اتفاق افتاد؟» و بعد میرن سراغ یه تحلیل تازه، یه اندیکاتور جدید، یا بدتر از اون، یه پست درمورد روانشناسی ترید که بهشون بگه آروم باشن. این پرسشِ بهظاهر منطقی، درواقع یه تلهی ذهنیه.…
#فارغازچارت تریدرها به دو دستهٔ فراری تقسیم میشوند: آنها که اسم روانشناسی را یدک میکشند تا ضعف ستاپ و نبودِ سیستم معاملاتی را پنهان کنند، و آنها که «تجربه» و «شش هفت سال زمان» را بهانه میکنند تا هرگز با طمع، ترس و بیانضباطی خودشان روبهرو نشوند. حقیقت این است که هیچکدام بهتنهایی کافی نیست. اگر کسی گفت «مسئله روانشناسی نیست، فقط تجربه است»، بدان که یا شناخت کافی از عملکرد مغز تحت ریسک ندارد، یا بهدنبال لای…
#فارغازچارت ضررِ سنگین هیچوقت با یک معاملهی بد شروع نمیشود؛ با یک «ذهنِ خسته» شروع میشود که ساعتهاست بدون توقف چارت را نگاه میکند. درآمد پایدار در ترید، پاداشِ پیشبینی درستِ قیمت نیست؛ نتیجهی مستقیمِ محافظت از سه دارایی است: سلامت روان، زمان و سرمایه. تریدری که این سه را جدی میگیرد، فقط روی پلن معاملاتیاش ریسک میکند، نه روی هیجان، انتقام یا احساسِ جاماندن. سودِ واقعی وقتی ساخته میشود که «نه گفتن» به مع…
⏰تمدید شد | به مدت 72 ساعت! ✔️معاملهگران محترم، تخفیف سرمایهگذار برتر بر روی هردو پلن A و B به مدت 72 ساعت تمدید شد. ⭐️15% تخفیف | حسابهای 1K تا 25K 🛍کد تخفیف: Trade15 ⭐️10% تخفیف | حسابهای 50K تا 200K 🛍کد تخفیف: Trade10 🗓مهلت تخفیف: 72 ساعت| تا 8 شهریور ساعت 19:00 📱 تلگرام 📱وبسایت 📱 یوتیوب 📱 اینستاگرام📱ایکس
#فارغازچارت وقتی سفارش خرید یا فروش رو ثبت میکنی، دقیقاً همان لحظهای که دکمه رو میزنی، یک صدا در ذهنت میگوید: «این بار فرق میکند.» اما صداهای بعدیاند که مسئولاند: «نمیدونستم»، «الان دیدم»، «اشتباه کردم». در روانشناسی ترید، بزرگترین خطا نه در تحلیل، که در «نسبت دادن علیت» پس از ضرر رخ میدهد. مغز تو برای حفظ تصویر خود از «منِ باهوش»، شکست را به بیرون نسبت میدهد: به نوسانگیر، به خبر ناگهانی، به اسپرد، به…
#فارغازچارت بزرگترین خطای روانی تریدر، تفکیک «نسخهی چارتی» خود از «نسخهی روزمره» است. پشت چارت، منظم، صبور و پایبند به قوانین ظاهر میشوی؛ اما بهمحض بستن صفحه، همان الگوهای قدیمی بازمیگردند: واکنشهای هیجانی، قضاوتهای شتابزده، و نیاز به تأیید دیگران. این دوپارگی شخصیت، مغز را شرطی میکند که «نسخهی ایدهآل» فقط در شرایط خاص فعال شود. اما بازار این دوگانگی را میخواند؛ چون تصمیمگیری در لحظه، بازتاب کل شخصیت…
ترید برای من راه فراری بود از بی عدالتی ها و نابرابریهای که هممون باش سر و کله میزنیم از لحظه هایی که به خاطر آشنای کسی نبودن زحمت و استعدادم نادیده گرفته شد به خاطر لحظه هایی که مهم نیست ملیتت چیه یا اهل کدوم شهری یا چه زبانی بلدی یا ماشینت چیه چون هیچ کدوم از اینا مهم نیست چون فقط زحمتت مهمه،تلاشت،سخت کوشیت و توانایی جا نزدنت مارکت ایقد بزرگه که نیازی نداره فرق بزاره اگه خوب باشی سود میکنی به همین سادگی اگه استمرا…
#فارغازچارت تریدر موفق کسی نیست که پیشبینیهایش درست از آب درمیآید. تریدر موفق کسی است که رابطهاش با «درست بودن» را برای همیشه اصلاح کرده است. تا وقتی نیاز داری تحلیلت تأیید شود، تا وقتی ورودت به معامله با یک «ببین گفتم» درونی همراه است، هنوز «من» در معامله حضور دارد. و این «من» همان چیزی است که جلوی اجرای بینقص استراتژی را میگیرد. حذف «من» یعنی پذیرش این حقیقت ساده: قیمت نه به تحلیل تو احترام میگذارد، نه ب…
#فارغازچارت مولانا میگوید: «از آب و گل بزادی در آتشی فتادی / سود و زیان یکی دان چون در قمار مایی». این دقیقاً توصیف وضعیت معاملهگری است که ذهنش را از دوگانهی «برد–باخت» رها نکرده. اما نکتهی روانشناختی عمیقتر اینجاست: ما ضرر را نه بهخاطر پول، که بهخاطر هویتمان تحمل نمیکنیم. تحقیقات در «زیانگریزی» (Kahneman & Tversky, 1979) نشان میدهد که درد ازدستدادن، تقریباً دوبرابر لذت بردن است. اما در ترید، این نسبت د…
#فارغازچارت تحلیل رفتارت توی ترید، از تحلیل چارت سختتره. چون مجبوری با تصویری که از خودت ساختی روبهرو شی. تریدر تازهکار میگه «استراتژیم بده». این جمله فقط یه گزارش فنی نیست، یه سپر محافظه. تا وقتی مشکل بیرون از توئه، لازم نیست با این واقعیت کنار بیای که شاید دانشت ناقصه، شاید عجله کردی، شاید اصلاً آماده نبودی. Ego میگه: «تو خوبی، استراتژی بده». تریدر باتجربهتر میگه «روانشناسیم خرابه». این هم یه سپر دیگهس…
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @honchoshow. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@MISHOV_FOREX · 50,414
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 August 2026
@G_N_E_S_R_0 · 126,484
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 August 2026
@battle_trading · 71,884
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 August 2026
@piknikanalyst_educations · 66,751
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 21 August 2026
@redmahale · 47,360
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 26 August 2026
@farachart · 43,040
Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
@UtoFx · 49,883
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 August 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فارغ از چارت” (@honchoshow), 7,916 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/honchoshow.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.