Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
13 measurements spanning 43 days, net -11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,953–2,006 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 16:21
1,988
-6
14 Sept 2026, 07:36
1,994
+13
10 Sept 2026, 09:40
1,981
+22
4 Sept 2026, 20:19
1,959
-10
28 Aug 2026, 17:42
1,969
-2
26 Aug 2026, 00:12
1,971
-3
23 Aug 2026, 07:17
1,974
-4
20 Aug 2026, 02:37
1,978
-7
16 Aug 2026, 18:24
1,985
-7
13 Aug 2026, 05:24
1,992
-8
9 Aug 2026, 19:02
2,000
+1
7 Aug 2026, 00:45
1,999
no change
6 Aug 2026, 20:33
1,999
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
22s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
226 reactions across 15 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
55
24.3%
💯
45
19.9%
🔥
32
14.2%
😁
31
13.7%
❤🔥
25
11.1%
🍓
12
5.31%
👏
9
3.98%
💅
5
2.21%
🥰
5
2.21%
🌚
4
1.77%
⚡
2
0.885%
🕊
1
0.442%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 226 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 16 we hold a reading for · 19%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hopejoboffer. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Валюта, которая будет дорожать
Чем дальше мы заходим в эпоху нейроконтента и бесконечного потока информации из короткого видеоряда, тем дороже становится одна очень простая штука — когда люди понимают:
«я этому человеку верю!»
И это касается не только блогеров и экспертов, а вообще всех. Вы можете быть невероятно сильным специалистом. У вас может быть 15 лет опыта, громкие компании в резюме, сложные проекты и реал…
СТРАТСЕССИЯ
…или способ реально пересобрать свою жизнь, доход и карьерные перспективы.
Я создала новый формат, который давно просился в мою практику — персональная карьерная стратегия в форме глубокой стратегической сессии.
❗️Это принципиально другое: я разработала рабочий визуальный фреймворк, а сама работа включает мой текущий подход интегративной бизнес-психологии, а также знаний рынка труда и его движения. «Ск…
Вот тут часто хочется не «еще одной статусной ачивки в трудовой книжке», а другого способа жить.
❗️Поэтому, если вы понимаете, что первая карьерная конструкция себя исчерпала, я бы не ждала 45. В 35–40 еще вполне можно сделать большой профессиональный разворот, но уже желательно не на эмоциях, а с расчетом: финансовая подушка, понятный горизонт перехода, тестирование нового направления, параллельный доход. Да дофига…
Кризисы половины жизни
Сразу оговорюсь: нет никакой кнопки, которая ровно в 35 лет включает «кризис», а в 40 — «срочно переосмыслить жизнь». Возрастные рамки условны и у каждого человека уникальны, но +/- схожи процессы.
В психологии развития действительно есть этапы, на которых у многих людей меняются вопросы к себе, близким, работе, деньгам и вообще к тому, зачем они что-то делают. Период 30–45 лет исследователи …
💡Кстати! Вы к своим 30-35 годам добились всего, чего хотели? Все успели из своего плана или ушли в кризисный виток?
Вы скажите, а потом я постом отвечу, как тут водится))
Плана не было, плыл по течению23%
Просто попал в кризис, хз как выбраться17%
Да, все успел, что хотел!23%
Нет, но план и мечты были30%
Хочу ответы посмотреть!23%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
40 лет — новые 30. Весьма интересную теорию всё больше и больше обсуждают в сети, которая утверждает, что традиционный жизненный таймлайн у людей по всему миру меняется. Популярность теории вполне понятна — люди по всему миру чаще считают, что живут с опозданием.
Если раньше считалось, что жизнь должна состоять вот так:
• к 30 — полноценная семья;
• к 35 — дом;
• к 40 — устоявшаяся карьера.
То теперь всё в глазах …
Значит, была вчера на публичной дискуссии «Как в эпоху клипового мышления рассказывать о себе так, чтобы вас запоминали» — и тема, конечно, максимально в карьерную боль, поэтому дам вам заметки с призмой на рабочие переговоры🤌
Вы можете быть очень сильным специалистом, а рассказывает о себе так, будто зачитывает должностную инструкцию.
А с вами должно быть вкусно, полезно и интересно говорить!
✨ Вот что из вчера за…
Просто делай хорошо свою работу и результат не заставит себя ждать! 🤌
Это я про себя и крутые резюме, которые создаю своим ребятам — в большие случаев сразу повышается конверсия в интервью))
Август и сентябрь традиционно сезон найма. Очень вижу по рынку труда оживление, каждый день получаю обратную связь по прохождению собеседований и офферам.
✨ Если вы в поиске — самое время взлететь именно сейчас!
Чего усложняем?
Человечество нашего времени слишком часто усложняет то, что касается денег и карьеры.
🤌Если эмоции отодвинуть схема довольно простая: у вас есть навыки и компетенции >> вы умеете приносить ими пользу и знаете, что это ценность >> умеете об этом рассказывать >> готовы за это брать деньги.
Хоба! Оно работает!
И вот на первых двух пунктах обычно все более-менее нормально. Если не хватает навыков — мо…
🔥12💯7❤3👏3
Signed Nadezhda Gnusina
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @hopejoboffer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
💡Кстати! Вы к своим 30-35 годам добились всего, чего хотели? Все успели из своего плана или ушли в кризисный виток?
Вы скажите, а потом я постом отвечу, как тут водится))
Плана не было, плыл по течению23%
Просто попал в кризис, хз как выбраться17%
Да, все успел, что хотел!23%
Нет, но план и мечты были30%
Хочу ответы посмотреть!23%
The shares total 116%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Надежда на оффер” (@hopejoboffer), 1,988 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hopejoboffer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
