Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for قوانین جهان هستی | Eslami X

Channel

قوانین جهان هستی | Eslami X

@hosseineslamix

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,888subscribers

-194 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001453251326
TypeChannel
Username@hosseineslamix
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hosseineslamix

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,8889,0828,98511 August 2026 — 9,082 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,082 subscribers12 August 2026 — 9,077 subscribers16 August 2026 — 9,064 subscribers19 August 2026 — 9,049 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,027 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,015 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,003 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,988 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,962 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,933 subscribers13 September 2026 — 8,916 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,888 subscribers11 August 202618 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 37 days, net -194. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,859–9,111 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 10:398,888-28
13 Sept 2026, 19:428,916-17
10 Sept 2026, 11:378,933-29
5 Sept 2026, 11:578,962-26
1 Sept 2026, 22:578,988-15
29 Aug 2026, 18:349,003-12
26 Aug 2026, 09:379,015-12
23 Aug 2026, 03:239,027-22
19 Aug 2026, 09:539,049-15
16 Aug 2026, 08:539,064-13
12 Aug 2026, 15:049,077-5
11 Aug 2026, 23:309,082no change
11 Aug 2026, 23:179,082first reading

Engagement

26 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.50%
avg views ÷ 8,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
400
1 post measured
Reaction rate
15.3%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 26 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 August 2026
Posts held26 (30 June 2026 – 26 August 2026)
Views total400
Reactions total61
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken28 Aug 2026, 15:40 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1,643 reactions across 24 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 91.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,51091.9%
🕊372.25%
🙏352.13%
🔥181.10%
😇120.73%
🫡100.609%
🤩80.487%
💯70.426%
❤‍🔥50.304%
😢10.061%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,643 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 26 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
39
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 24 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
28
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hosseineslamix. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 26 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 30 June 2026 to 26 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC400 views61 reactionsread 28 August 2026

اونی که می‌سازه، خداست؛ تو فقط فرمونو بده، باقیش با اوست. نیت کن، دل بده، رها شو؛ راه رو بسپار به او، همراهِ او شو. «وَأُفَوِّضُ أَمْرِي إِلَى اللَّهِ» من می‌سپارم، او می‌سازه؛ من قدم می‌ذارم، او راه میندازه. تو فقط بخواه… خدا بلدِ ساختنه @hosseineslamix

❤56🙏5

22 Aug 2026, 18:49 UTC794 views29 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

الحمدالله نتایج شما نتیجه ی خودمه چقدر خوشحالم از این پیام ها

❤29

13 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,330 views25 reactionsread 28 August 2026

برای تهیه دوره به شناسه ارتباطی @mreslamix پیام بدید

❤25

13 Aug 2026, 17:05 UTC≈1,330 views47 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

الان زمان توئه که فقط از جذب نشنوی خودت وارد میدان بشی فقط تماشا نکنی اثر خلق رو جذب کنی نوش وجودتون …➕💥

❤47

13 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC≈1,250 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

بسم الله الرحمن الرحیم سلام و درود فراوان ⚡️دوره «جذب اثر»⚡️ تا حالا فکر کردی چرا بعضی آدم‌ها فقط آرزو نمی‌کنن… انگار جهان، دقیقاً همون چیزی رو سر راهشون می‌ذاره که انتخاب کردن؟ چون منتظر «شانس» نمی‌مونن؛ میدان خودشون رو می‌سازن. در دوره‌ی جذب اثر قرار نیست فقط درباره قانون جذب حرف بزنیم؛ قرارِ ما اینه که خودت طراح میدان جذب خودت باشی و بالاتر از جذب رو تجربه کنی از خودآگاهی شروع می‌کنیم؛ می‌فهمیم چه چیزی واقعاً ا…

❤33

11 Aug 2026, 20:08 UTC997 views63 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

➕خدای من➕ هماهنگ با قلبی❤️ که تنها جایگاه توست ضربانش گواه این شهادت؛ که تنها تورا میپرستم و تنها از تو یاری مجویم🤲🏼✨ @hosseineslamix ✅

❤54🕊6😇2🔥1

8 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,380 views162 reactionsread 28 August 2026

به نام خداوند بخشنده و مهربان زیر نظر خدا باشید و مانا چند نفر حاضرند به ۲ الی ۳ پادکست به صورت دقیق گوش بدن و اجرا کنند …؟ هم مسیرای من اگر بخوام براتون ۳ تا اصل دریافت کنندگی حرفه ای رو بگم چقدر میتونی ادامه بدی؟ میتونی به خودت تعهد بدی که هر لحظه فراتر از محیطت حتی فراتر از افکارت احساس کنی؟ با لایکاتون اعلام حضور کنید …

❤150❤‍🔥5🕊5💯2

4 Aug 2026, 21:21 UTC≈1,740 views92 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

دنیا هر چقدر هم شلوغ باشه، آخرش دل فقط یک آدرس رو بلده؛ عشقی که نه مرز می‌شناسه، نه زبان، نه زمان یا ابا عبدالله الحسین علیه‌السلام🖤

❤87🕊5

3 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC≈1,520 views63 reactionsread 28 August 2026

از خود بپرس… جامِ جانت از چیست؟ زیرا آن‌گاه که طوفان برخیزد، از کوزه همان برون تراود که در اوست. ناملایمات، آفریننده ی حقیقت تو نیستند؛ اگر خدا در دلت نشسته باشد، آرامش جاری می‌شود… و اگر غیرِ او، همان بر لب و جانت خواهد نشست. پرده را کنار بزن تا حقیقت آشکار شود @hosseineslamix ✅

❤56💯4🕊2🫡1

28 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,920 views58 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

عجیب و غریب جواب میده به همه تون … قبلش حتما پادکست رو گوش بدید عشق به همه تون❤️ @hosseineslamix

❤49🤩4🫡3🕊2

28 Jul 2026, 14:59 UTC≈1,770 views60 reactionsread 28 August 2026
File

چقدر خوشحالم برای عزیزانی که با این آگاهی زندگی میکنند…🫶🏼 @hosseineslamix

❤52🔥4🙏4

Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @hosseineslamix. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hosseineslamix edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
24 August 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“قوانین جهان هستی | Eslami X” (@hosseineslamix), 8,888 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hosseineslamix.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.