Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net +407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,458–6,994 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 06:27
6,932
+1
3 Nov 2026, 22:47
6,931
+1
1 Nov 2026, 06:59
6,930
+36
28 Oct 2026, 23:38
6,894
-4
25 Oct 2026, 20:20
6,898
+4
22 Oct 2026, 13:59
6,894
+17
18 Oct 2026, 22:58
6,877
-5
15 Oct 2026, 17:19
6,882
+3
12 Oct 2026, 09:19
6,879
-3
5 Oct 2026, 16:41
6,882
+146
28 Sept 2026, 08:59
6,736
+38
18 Sept 2026, 18:20
6,698
+81
14 Sept 2026, 16:18
6,617
+4
10 Sept 2026, 16:15
6,613
+5
5 Sept 2026, 23:56
6,608
-3
1 Sept 2026, 22:56
6,611
+91
30 Aug 2026, 07:49
6,520
-2
27 Aug 2026, 16:43
6,522
-1
24 Aug 2026, 12:58
6,523
-9
21 Aug 2026, 04:24
6,532
first reading
Engagement
24 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.58%
avg views ÷ 6,932 subscribers
Avg views / post
595
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.34%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 24 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held
24 (19 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total
7,140
Reactions total
167
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Nov 2026, 14:40 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,010
Videos
≈447
Links
≈288
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
4m 28s
Average length
34s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
322 reactions across 24 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
115
35.7%
👍
88
27.3%
🔥
76
23.6%
🤔
43
13.4%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 322 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
17
of 24 we hold a reading for · 71%
Most on one post
7
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hotel_geek. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
12.5%
3 of 24 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
3
posts carrying an erid · 3 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
337
over 3 measured posts
Median views · rest
877
over 21 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2W5zFH9M4qQ
1
7 November 2026
7 November 2026
2W5zFHgaX1t
1
6 November 2026
6 November 2026
2W5zFJmirwT
1
28 October 2026
28 October 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (16.7%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
📲 Из подписчиков — в гостей
У отеля есть аккаунты в соцсетях, но какие площадки и контент действительно подходят вашей аудитории?
12 ноября на бесплатном вебинаре bnovo обсудят, как выбрать площадки для своего объекта, организовать работу с контентом и продвигать публикации. Поговорят и о том, какие показатели помогут оценить результат — от охватов до обращений и броней.
🎤 Спикеры:
Ксения Косарева, бренд-менеджер…
Сезон адвент-календарей открыт. У отелей тоже
Гостиничная группа Aman анонсировала календарь своего розничного бренда Aman Essentials. Внутри — 25 подарков, включая косметику, средства для спа-ухода и аксессуары.
Стоимость $799.
Горный пейзаж на коробке вдохновлён Amankora — комплексом из пяти лоджей Aman в Бутане.
🏛️ Наследие — это не только про сохранение памяти.
Это ресурс, который помогает территории, объекту и бренду формировать смысл, привлекать людей и проектировать будущее.
Приглашаем на открытый мастер‑класс:
✨ Открытый мастер-класс от Академии гостеприимтсва курорта Мрия: «Наследие: от сохранения памяти к проектированию будущего»
Разберём:
✅ как увидеть ценность наследия
✅ как перевести её в понятную концепцию
✅ ка…
На шесть тысяч футов по ту сторону человека и времени*
Где-то первый снег, а где-то в Швейцарских Альпах золотая осень.
📍 Отель Grand Hotel Kronenhof, Швейцария
* Фридрих Ницше
Если вы устали от работы и периодически мечтаете всё бросить и куда-нибудь уехать — поздравляю, вы не одиноки
На смену привычной модели «сначала работаешь 40 лет, а потом отдыхаешь и путешествуешь» приходит другая: работа → длительный перерыв → снова работа → снова перерыв.
У такого подхода даже есть название — микропенсия (micro-retirement).
Идея в том, что необязательно ждать определённого возраста, чтобы позвол…
Бутик отель в здании бывшей церкви
Hotel Lucile открылся в здании пресвитерианской церкви 1931 г. в Лос-Анджелесе. Все очень камерно и атмосферно: 25 номеров, внутренний двор с бассейном, терраса на крыше с видом на город, сохранённые витражи и балки.
В бывшем церковном зале — ресторан Sous Sous. Его кухня объединяет два юга — Францию и США. А по вечерам по коридорам отеля ездит тележка с мартини: коктейльный час с…
Привлекаете гостей, приглашая к себе инфлюенсеров? А кто-то пытается от них избавиться
Отель Hotel du Cap-Eden-Roc 5*, Франция, известный своими знаменитыми гостями, видами на Лазурный Берег и впечатляющим панорамным бассейном, ввёл новые правила проведения фотосъёмок: теперь они запрещены без предварительного разрешения.
Причиной стали посетители, которые бронировали столики на обед, а затем приезжали…нет, не чтоб…
Продолжается серия практических вебинаров «Островок внимания: как привлечь гостей». Изучайте расписание и присоединяйтесь, чтобы узнать больше об эффективном продвижении в условиях высокой конкуренции.
Что вы получите
● Инструменты для роста загрузки и дохода
● Записи вебинаров
● Шанс выиграть приз на финальном вебинаре
Участие во всех вебинарах бесплатное, зарегистрироваться можно по ссылке.
Униформа - это часть сервиса
Продуманная форма сразу даёт понять: здесь следят за деталями. Цвета, крой, аксессуары вызывают ассоциации и работают как эмоциональный якорь.
Собрала фото униформы знаковых отелей, которые были продуманы как отдельный вид искусства.
📍Peninsula London - здесь униформу для 500 сотрудников создала Дженни Пэкхэм — дизайнер, одевающая принцессу Уэльскую. Она сшила около 60 разных предмето…
Столичные отели участвуют в федеральном проекте «Производительность труда» с целью повышения качества и скорости обслуживания гостей
Проект охватил 32 отеля Москвы (10 из них 5*), 24 из которых завершили работу с экспертами Правительства Москвы. Среди участников, например, SkyPoint Шереметьево, Арт Москва Войковская, Radisson Blu LeninskyProspect.
В числе ключевых процессов, которые отели выбирают для оптимизации в…
Крупные распродажи на Ozon для загрузки вашего отеля
Повышайте количество бронирований в период Распродажи 11.11 и Чёрной пятницы
Ozon Travel использует высокий спрос покупателей маркетплейса в вашу пользу. Присоединяйтесь к акциям, чтобы получить:
• дополнительную подсветку в поисковой выдаче и на карте
• размещение на лендингах и промополках распродаж
• повышенный трафик для карточек объекта размещения
Подклю…
Самый большой отель мира, который занесен в Книгу Гиннесса с 2015 г.
Комплекс First World Hotel из 7 351 номера принимает тысячи гостей ежедневно. Расположен в Малайзии, в курортной зоне на высоте более 1800 метров над уровнем моря. Туристы приезжают сюда ради прохлады, азартных игр, шопинга и аттракционов.
Лобби выглядит как зал ожидания аэропорта: экраны с доступностью номеров, очереди с талонами. В пиковые часы …
👍7🔥4🤔2❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @hotel_geek. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @hotel_geek as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
5 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
7 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Ночной портье @portierdenuit · 22,138 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
GASTROhotel @gastrohotel · 19,800 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 4 October 2026
Отелло @otello_travel · 51,692 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 22 August 2026
На Своих Двоих🎒 @getaroundrussia · 35,981 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 3 September 2026
Максонская ложа (Канал) @nomarketolog · 27,218 Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 23 September 2026
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Глазами отельера” (@hotel_geek), 6,932 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hotel_geek.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.