Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for VO$HOT

Channel

VO$HOT

@hotminingru

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,705subscribers

-97 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002018970320
TypeChannel
Username@hotminingru
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/hotminingru

Growth

6,7056,8026,753.57 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,802 subscribers8 August 2026 — 6,799 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,790 subscribers14 August 2026 — 6,770 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,756 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,740 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,721 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,712 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,705 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
10 measurements spanning 23 days, net -97. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,690–6,817 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 03:166,705-7
27 Aug 2026, 08:546,712-9
24 Aug 2026, 17:486,721-19
20 Aug 2026, 23:396,740-16
17 Aug 2026, 16:286,756-14
14 Aug 2026, 14:156,770-20
10 Aug 2026, 22:216,790-9
8 Aug 2026, 05:276,799-3
7 Aug 2026, 12:326,802no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:296,802first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 11 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.28%
avg views ÷ 6,705 subscribers
Avg views / post
488
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.842%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (21 July 202619 August 2026)
Views total5,854
Reactions total45
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken20 Aug 2026, 04:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

104 reactions across 16 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥5250.0%
2726.0%
👏2120.2%
🤣43.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 104reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hotminingru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2026 to 19 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC196 views5 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🎁Вот вам и небольшой сквиз по битку Минфин США сегодня продемонстрировал агрессивные покупки дальних облигаций, и люди начали переживать, что включился печатный станок 👍Ну а в крипте, что в крипте? - всё наоборот! С 66 тысяч улетели до 70 тысяч за биткоин Давно такого не было, на моей памяти. Раньше было весело, когда ставку в США понижали, и вроде как позитив, а крипта вниз летела, сейчас те же вайбы) 🤔Ну а мож

👏4🔥1

19 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC165 views9 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Forwarded from @NEARLegion

🥁 Announcing the winners for the 2nd NEAR Legion Video Content Campaign! We had close to 25 submissions with some interesting takes to pitch the NEAR is AI Money narrative, an exciting, new use case for the NEAR token that will get more popular as awareness about it grows. Winners: 🥇 @danseyka — 50 NEAR — Video 🥈 @Om7ethh — 30 NEAR — Video 🥉 @daralife2 — 20 NEAR — Video Honorary mentions (in no particular order):

🔥6👏3

16 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC463 views3 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

📊Немного по поводу лимита в 300 тысяч рублей для неквалов Начнём сразу с того, что по словам РБК: «лимит установлен не непосредственно законом, а актом Банка России». Это значит, что цифра в 300 тысяч будет куда более гибкой, чем мы можем себе представлять. Негатив по такому лимиту уже заметен, но, поскольку торговлю криптой вот только официально запускают в РФ (для квалов и неквалов), то хотя бы с чего-то надо нача

2👏1

13 Aug 2026, 19:48 UTC507 viewsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🥸В магазине мерча $DOGS сейчас какие-то небывалые скидки 💰Помню, как покупал эти айтемы по фул прайсу, сейчас цены упали ещё сильнее, чем на другой распродаже вначале этого лета Учтите, что при заказе так же берётся взнос в 25$ за доставку https://dogs.market Спасибо https://t.me/cvotercrypto за альфу :)

11 Aug 2026, 13:02 UTC595 views6 reactionsread 20 August 2026

🐉Награды для Вангардов решили продлить на некоторых изменённых условиях: https://t.me/c/2742182312/132910 200 NEAR получат ещё 30 новых Вангардов (по сути призы закроются, как их число вангардов 80, сейчас 59 (хотя по факту 54, поскольку ещё 5 сбт принадлежит команде)) Ну что же, действуем тогда, кто ещё не успел

3🤣2🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 11:29 UTC537 views3 reactions1 Starread 20 August 2026
Photo

📈Всем хорошего дня! Вновь отрабатываю Реддит в который раз и теперь веду себя максимально как реальный пользователь, а не как тот, что старается отработать квесты для легиона) И пока говорят, что в крипте дела плохи, Co founder эфира так не думает

2🔥1

10 Aug 2026, 14:51 UTC553 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

👀Либо это я тогда выпадал из интернета, либо не все уследили, что на программу Near 3.33 оказывается нужна регистрация Все ваши удержанные балансы и свопы вроде как должны сохраниться, но для регистрации ещё раз необходимо сделать своп и продержать больше 100 баксов на балансе 📸Для регистрации заходим на near.com и пролистав вниз находим программу Near 3.33, присоединяемся к ней Если смотреть на прогресс, то до об

4

9 Aug 2026, 19:17 UTC505 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🎁Из интересного на TON сегодня: 🔝Сервис Chainspect сегодня показывает, что количество валидаторов в сети упало на 60% до 159. Вероятно, это ошибка, поскольку другие сайты показывают, что количество не изменилось (так и осталось - 398) Так же вчера подвели итоги международной олимпиады по ИИ от TON в Астане, победителям вскоре разошлют призовые в виде новых эксклюзивных телеграм подарков, откуп которых планируется п

🔥2

7 Aug 2026, 10:45 UTC567 views0 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

За Вангардов закрыли награды 🥲 Получается, больше нет никаких щедрых 400 $NEAR Я лично до последнего думал, что награды получит вся тысяча Вангардов, хотя раздавать за такое около +500 тысяч $ суммарно было бы очень щедрым даже для самого богатого протокола Поскольку начали появляться новые миссии у Vanguard, думаю, что скоро завезут новую роль, а с ней и новые награды Вот так получается. Мне, конечно, обидно, иб

6 Aug 2026, 07:28 UTC610 views4 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🤨Никита Бир уходит с должности Head of product платформы X 🗣Напомню, что Никита ввёл за последний год множество неоднозначных изменений на платформе. С одной стороны они пошли на пользу серверам и ограничениям ии слопа, с другой - убили целую мету, InfoFi, которая только начала оживать в прошлом году, а изменения навредили фармерам бейджей некоторых проектов в X и тем, кто старался очень незаметно прятать свои реффк

🔥3👏1

4 Aug 2026, 07:50 UTC549 views2 reactionsread 20 August 2026

Ещё сделали понятный видеогайд на эту тему, вот ссылка: https://t.me/NEARLegion/260

👏2

3 Aug 2026, 18:59 UTC607 views7 reactionsread 20 August 2026
Photo

🐉Всем привет! Хорошего начала недели Near Ai недавно добавили переломную фичу для использования своих облачных токенов. Если раньше, для этого дела вам была необходима зарубежная карта и списания с неё, то теперь токены для использования хранилища смогут добавляться к вам за стейкинг токенов $NEAR. В анонсах было написано, что минимальный порог - 50 $NEAR. Для того, чтобы попробовать фишку, заходим на официальный са

🔥32👏2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @hotminingru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 183,700 of 1,626,935entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

HERE Village 🛖
@herevillage_chanel · 43,495
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 28 August 2026
PitchTalk Announcements
@pitchtalk_ai · 237,111
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 August 2026
#HAPI Announcements
@hapi_ann · 73,920
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VO$HOT” (@hotminingru), 6,705 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hotminingru.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.