НОВЫЙ ЧАТ: https://t.me/f1nchekxChat
Signed Pancake

Channel
@hoverrrx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
64subscribers
-20 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004373704034 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hoverrrx |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 1 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hoverrrx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 64 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:39 | 68 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 20:25 | 69 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 74 | -7 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 21:16 | 81 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:16 | 84 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 18:31 | 84 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
59 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5384095458085853466 | 12 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5443130556663491608 | 12 | 20.3% | |
| custom 5089479191414440704 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5192739555354124520 | 7 | 11.9% | |
| custom 5091489356368053313 | 6 | 10.2% | |
| custom 5323540946107798187 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 8.47% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 5.08% | |
| custom 5307842441208937672 | 2 | 3.39% |
Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
НОВЫЙ ЧАТ: https://t.me/f1nchekxChat
Signed Pancake
НОВЫЙ КАНАЛ: https://t.me/f1nchekx
❤🔥3
Signed Pancake
#Finch думаю вы уже могли заметить что актив у канале очень упал. я не знаю почему это постоянно происходит. конечно я предполагаю что это моя вина, и из-за моих рестов, но так больше быть не может. я с администрацией постоянно пытаемся поднять актив, я делаю съёмки, но почти никто не приходит. тоже самое и с интерактивами от админов. что же я буду делать? мы с лечом приняли решение переехать в другой канал. он будет…
❤🔥2❤1
Signed зяблик ипотека
#Important🎤 ребята, давайте поднимать актив. в последнее время он очень упал, я знаю что это моя вина, но всё же. пока что ставьте реакции, проверим на сколько вы активны 🤩
custom 538409545808585346610custom 53235409461077981874custom 51927395553541245203custom 54431305566634916083
Signed зяблик ипотека
Заканчиваем,так как никто не играет. 🌟 @R1ch130 +40 баллов #Эклер #Итоги
custom 54431305566634916081
Signed Shavings
#mrp
Signed зяблик ипотека
🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎🆎 — Динь дон, я Предвестник! Вкукер, художник, эдитор и будущий актёр(🤓) и я приглашаю вас в свою супер-мега-пупер крутую студию где вы сможете найти кучу видосов, лот(?) и интерактивов.. Задерживать не буду, всё самое важное🥹 Студия: https://t.me/Prescu Личка: @Aaromon (Вп WCUE студии, тгк связанные с WCUE only‼️)
Signed зяблик ипотека
беру вп от 50+! 🎤 пишите в лс @JAKTI01 #Important
custom 53235409461077981871custom 53840954580858534661custom 54431305566634916081
Signed зяблик ипотека
Давайте поиграем.Во что?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
custom 54431305566634916083❤2
Signed Shavings
#Important ⊹₊ съёмки опять отменяются. приношу свои извинения. это моя вина, но я постораюсь заняться каналом и вернуть актив. надеюсь что вы мне тоже с этим поможете
custom 50894791914144407044custom 53078424412089376721
Signed зяблик ипотека
🎀ъёмки✨ ๑︎ время: 16:00 по мск 16:00 по киеву снимаем на вип сервере🎤 ⊹₊ кидать в друзья: Tanhonc (hover) 🎀ажно: 1. слушайте команды овнера и админ состава ; 2. чат офф - нельзя писать ; 3. когда я буду садится - это значит, что я снимаю ; Всех ждём!!😀
Signed зяблик ипотека
ИТОГИ ИГРЫ 🌟 @Lesozarnik 70 баллов @ElevenMEOOW 50 баллов @Cometa_Star 20 баллов @Lassyusha 10 баллов Баллы зачислены в копилку! #Эклер #Итоги
custom 54431305566634916083
Signed Shavings
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @hoverrrx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Давайте поиграем.Во что?
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Давайте поиграем!!Во что?
The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@hoverrrx named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
We ourselves saw each of these resolve to a real page at some point before it went vacant — a genuine, evidenced change, not an inference from absence.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“переезд 𝙁𝙞𝙣𝙘𝙝 𝙁𝙞𝙡𝙢𝙘𝙧𝙚𝙬” (@hoverrrx), 64 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hoverrrx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.