Иван Бортников про отечественную музыку и о другом.
https://vk.com/hrushevkaorg
Бусти: https://boosty.to/hrushevka
Предложить свою музыку: https://clck.ru/3Ssmbc
Реклама / Сотрудничество: @Hrushevkapromo
Created
3 June 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
40 measurements spanning 92 days, net +1,114. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,132–10,615 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 40
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 03:26
10,444
+78
5 Nov 2026, 00:47
10,366
+44
4 Nov 2026, 02:18
10,322
-7
3 Nov 2026, 02:59
10,329
-4
31 Oct 2026, 02:59
10,333
-7
29 Oct 2026, 23:16
10,340
-3
29 Oct 2026, 02:50
10,343
-10
28 Oct 2026, 03:58
10,353
-4
27 Oct 2026, 06:17
10,357
-3
26 Oct 2026, 06:05
10,360
-3
25 Oct 2026, 02:36
10,363
-14
24 Oct 2026, 05:06
10,377
+7
23 Oct 2026, 02:54
10,370
-4
22 Oct 2026, 03:10
10,374
-1
21 Oct 2026, 00:19
10,375
-7
20 Oct 2026, 01:48
10,382
-18
19 Oct 2026, 02:09
10,400
-9
17 Oct 2026, 23:36
10,409
-13
17 Oct 2026, 01:11
10,422
+23
16 Oct 2026, 02:29
10,399
first reading
Engagement
136 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
14.4%
avg views ÷ 10,444 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,510
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.91%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 136 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held
136 (3 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total
42,219
Reactions total
1,228
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
6 Nov 2026, 20:58 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈12,500
Videos
≈260
Links
≈4,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
15m 02s
Average length
1m 40s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
7,395 reactions across 131 posts, in 58 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 17.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
1,314
17.8%
❤
1,167
15.8%
🔥
1,119
15.1%
🤣
444
6.00%
⚡
436
5.90%
😁
426
5.76%
👏
351
4.75%
❤🔥
270
3.65%
💯
221
2.99%
🏆
186
2.52%
🤯
143
1.93%
💊
106
1.43%
🤝
87
1.18%
🤔
86
1.16%
🙏
85
1.15%
😎
81
1.10%
👌
76
1.03%
💔
76
1.03%
😢
75
1.01%
😈
67
0.906%
38 further kinds
579
7.83%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 133 of the 136 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7,478 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
4
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 133 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
3
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hrushevkaorg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 136 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Advertising
Ad load
1.47%
2 of 136 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
2
posts carrying an erid · 2 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
1,410
over 2 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,690
over 131 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
erid
Posts
First seen
Last seen
2Vtzqv5GJu1
1
11 August 2026
11 August 2026
2VtzqwJx2ZR
1
24 August 2026
24 August 2026
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 5 of 29 posts held from the last 30 days (17.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Классики отечественного спокен ворда «2-й СОРТ» 7 ноября дадут в Питере концерт.
Команду редко можно увидеть вживую, поэтому для своего сольника они приготовили пару сюрпризов, позвав Ваню Пинженина и «Выход на посадку».
Концерт пройдет в старейшем питерском клубе Fish Fabrique. Будет мерч (так что захватите наличку).
Лучше взять билеты сейчас (ибо дешевле): https://prazdnik2sorta.ticketscloud.org/
На входе билеты…
«Я хочу создать свой собственный полумузыкальный клуб или что-то в этом роде». На аукционе Литфонда выставили на продажу письмо Петра Мамонова Брайану Ино и его супруге Атене, написанное в 1991 году.
«Дорогие Брайан и Антея!
Сначала я хочу поздравить вас с завершением такой большой работы, как альбом с Джоном Кейлом. Мои дела продвигаются не так быстро, но продвигаются. Я создал свою частную компанию «Мамонов» как …
Старейший отечественный фестиваль независимой музыки «Индюшата» объявил итоги отбора.
24 и 25 ноября перед жюри, промоутерами, журналистами и представителями лейблов выступят восемь групп.
В битве участвуют:
Шатуны (ЕКБ)
Уральский дарк-фолк с баяном.
Мартовские Иды (СПб)
Смесь тягучего нуарного блюза, пост-панка и инди-рока 90-х.
ВЯ (Калуга)
Абсурдный авант-шансон, сделанный на неочевидных инструментах.
Тумба-Ю…
Послушал «Тройки» от петербургской банды «Цусима». Докладываю.
Формально это гаражный панк-рок с женским вокалом и феминистской иронией (привет группе «Позоры»). Лирическая героиня — женщина-вампир. Она знает себе цену, ходит на свидания и готова высасывать кровь из своих любовников на одну ночь.
Звучание не пытается удивить изощрённостью и близко к звуку команд, игравших в 2010-х на фестивалях типа «Гаражная жара»…
Послушал эмбиентную пьесу Марка Сабурова «The Nervous Breakdown of Brian E.». Докладываю
Эмбиент уже давненько перестал быть диковинным экспериментом для обывателя, превратившись в дизайнерский инструмент оформления пространства (от офисов до алгоритмических плейлистов для сна). На этом фоне работа «The Nervous Breakdown of Brian E.» выглядит как полемический жест по отношению к этой тенденции. Попытка вынуть из жан…
Группа Ploho записывает альбом «Фантомные чувства».
2021 год
«Чертовски приятно записать альбом №1 в этом списке.
Ploho „Фантомные“ писали основные инструменты в деревенском доме — очень атмосферно и честно было. Голоса и акустику — уже в небольшой студии.
Легендарный гитарный комбик 80-х Roland Jazz Chorus 120 очень там уместен, и даже в клипе снялся.
Roland Jazz Chorus 120, около 1980 года. Классический звук нь…
Розыгрыш 5 билетов на двоих на концерт Дедовского свитера 7 ноября в Петербурге, мерча от группы и сборника «Фузз и Дружба. Сборник рока. Часть 1» на виниле, кассете и диске
Для участия надо подписаться:
• Как же надоела эта музыка
• ХРУЩЕВКА
• Дедовский свитер
• SPB GIGS
• Гиг За Сотку | СПБ
И нажать на кнопку «Участвовать»
Победители будут определены этом посте 7 ноября в 12:00. Получить призы можно только на к…
В поисках янтарной комнаты
Тридцать лет назад вышла моя любимая статья о русском роке, которую написал питерский журналист Василий Соловьев-Спасский. Несмотря на то, что нам с ним довелось стать соавторами массивного фолианта «Аквариум». Сны о чем-то большем», мы знакомы не были и ни разу в жизни не общались. О чем страшно жалею, поскольку я всегда считал Василия одним из самых главных и важных рок-критиков в стране…
👍27🔥6🥰3👏1🫡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 136 posts we hold for @hrushevkaorg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@hrushevkaorg edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
26 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Каждую неделю выбираем лучший альбом одного артиста. Сегодня выясняем, какой лучший альбом у группы «Кино».
45 (1982)14%
46 (1983)6%
Начальник Камчатки (1984)10%
Это не любовь (1985)21%
Ночь (1986)24%
Группа крови (1988)22%
Последний герой (1989)12%
Звезда по имени Солнце (1989)17%
Чёрный альбом (1991)31%
The shares total 157%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 136 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 61 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 33 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
между приговым и курехиным @betweenprigov · 21,129 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 26 September 2026
Бонд с кнопкой @bondskopkoi · 32,836 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
Русский шаффл @rushuffle · 44,110 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 28 August 2026
ЗДЕСЬ БЫЛ МАЙК @mikewashere · 21,483 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 24 September 2026
Родной звук @rodzvuk · 36,521 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
Психоделия по-советски @sovietunder · 24,874 Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 September 2026
VATNIKSTAN @vatnikstan · 19,968 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Kё(ru.wikipedia.org) “…стилей работает на создание мистической атмосферы{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/hrushevkaorg/10318|title=«Послушал новый альбом дальневосточных kё «Перья…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ХРУЩЕВКА” (@hrushevkaorg), 10,444 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hrushevkaorg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.