Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for توقعات كرة القدم - HSBET

Channel

توقعات كرة القدم - HSBET

@hsbet

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,570,619subscribers

+467,281 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among the largest entries.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001757084718
TypeChannel
Usernames@hsbet @hsbet2
Description​HSBET | عالم القمة والأرباح ⚽️💎 ​🔞 المحتوى مخصص لمن هم فوق 21 عاماً 📈 مراهنات ذكية بأقوى الاستراتيجيات مع كرة قدم • هوكي • تنس • FIFA • سلة ✅ ​🎁 جوائز نقدية ومسابقات يومية 🔑 كود الحظ لجميع المنصات HSBET مع 💰 بونص يصل لـ $200 عند التسجيل @HamzaSama
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held121
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/hsbet

Topic

Gambling & betting — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views and reactions moved apart

On 1,304 of the 2,210 posts we watched over 30 days, the view counter climbed while the reaction counter stayed where it was — by more than this channel’s own reactions-per-view rate can account for. That rate, measured on this entry, is 0.0224 reactions per view.

Each interval, as we read it — views and reactions before and after
PostOverViewsReactionsExpected
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC55 minutes1,760 → 2,420at least +650423 → 423at most +1+14.5
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC1.7 hours2,420 → 3,270at least +840423 → 424at most +2+18.8
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC30 minutes3,270 → 4,970at least +1,690424 → 424at most +1+37.8
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC35 minutes4,970 → 7,270at least +2,290424 → 424at most +1+51.2
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC30 minutes7,270 → 8,740at least +1,460424 → 424at most +1+32.7
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC35 minutes8,740 → 12,400at least +3,560424 → 425at most +2+79.7
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC65 minutes12,400 → 16,000at least +3,500425 → 425at most +1+78.3
/10281320 Oct 2026, 07:05 UTC35 minutes17,900 → 21,900at least +3,900425 → 426at most +2+87.3
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC30 minutes1,400 → 3,200at least +1,790279 → 281at most +3+40.1
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC35 minutes3,200 → 5,630at least +2,420281 → 281at most +1+54.1
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC30 minutes5,630 → 6,950at least +1,310281 → 283at most +3+29.3
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC35 minutes6,950 → 10,300at least +3,250283 → 283at most +1+72.7
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC30 minutes10,300 → 12,000at least +1,600283 → 283at most +1+35.8
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC35 minutes12,000 → 13,900at least +1,800283 → 283at most +1+40.3
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC30 minutes13,900 → 16,400at least +2,400283 → 283at most +1+53.7
/10281720 Oct 2026, 10:19 UTC35 minutes16,400 → 20,300at least +3,800283 → 283at most +1+85.0
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC30 minutes2,100 → 2,670at least +560272 → 273at most +2+12.5
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC35 minutes2,670 → 3,470at least +790273 → 274at most +2+17.7
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC30 minutes3,470 → 4,090at least +610274 → 274at most +1+13.6
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC35 minutes4,090 → 5,010at least +910274 → 275at most +2+20.4
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC31 minutes5,010 → 6,570at least +1,550275 → 275at most +1+34.7
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC30 minutes6,570 → 8,300at least +1,720275 → 275at most +1+38.5
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC1.6 hours8,300 → 20,800at least +12,400275 → 275at most +1+277.4
/10284720 Oct 2026, 14:36 UTC35 minutes20,800 → 24,100at least +3,200275 → 275at most +1+71.6
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC35 minutes1,480 → 2,120at least +630228 → 229at most +2+14.1
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC30 minutes2,120 → 2,610at least +480229 → 229at most +1+10.7
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC28 minutes2,610 → 3,110at least +490229 → 229at most +1+11.0
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC37 minutes3,110 → 4,180at least +1,060229 → 229at most +1+23.7
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC30 minutes7,420 → 10,500at least +2,980310 → 314at most +5+66.7
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC35 minutes13,500 → 18,200at least +4,600388 → 388at most +1+102.9
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC65 minutes18,200 → 26,100at least +7,800388 → 388at most +1+174.5
/10291821 Oct 2026, 11:34 UTC30 minutes26,100 → 30,400at least +4,200388 → 388at most +1+94.0
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC35 minutes2,000 → 2,860at least +850226 → 227at most +2+19.0
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC30 minutes2,860 → 3,530at least +660227 → 227at most +1+14.8
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC28 minutes3,530 → 4,200at least +660227 → 227at most +1+14.8
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC37 minutes4,200 → 5,300at least +1,090227 → 227at most +1+24.4
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC30 minutes8,670 → 11,800at least +3,030359 → 364at most +6+67.8
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC34 minutes11,800 → 14,900at least +3,000364 → 377at most +14+67.1
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC35 minutes14,900 → 19,800at least +4,800377 → 377at most +1+107.4
/10291921 Oct 2026, 11:36 UTC65 minutes19,800 → 27,400at least +7,500377 → 377at most +1+167.8
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC31 minutes1,870 → 2,390at least +510218 → 218at most +1+11.4
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC34 minutes2,390 → 3,140at least +740218 → 219at most +2+16.6
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC35 minutes3,140 → 3,660at least +510219 → 219at most +1+11.4
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC51 minutes3,660 → 4,300at least +630219 → 221at most +3+14.1
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC56 minutes5,430 → 6,770at least +1,330221 → 221at most +1+29.8
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC34 minutes6,770 → 8,220at least +1,440221 → 221at most +1+32.2
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC30 minutes9,180 → 11,200at least +1,920221 → 221at most +1+43.0
/1039562 Nov 2026, 12:05 UTC35 minutes14,300 → 20,700at least +6,300221 → 221at most +1+141.0
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC30 minutes9,000 → 11,100at least +2,000665 → 666at most +2+44.8
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC35 minutes11,300 → 13,200at least +1,800666 → 666at most +1+40.3
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC35 minutes13,200 → 16,700at least +3,400666 → 666at most +1+76.1
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC30 minutes16,700 → 20,500at least +3,700666 → 666at most +1+82.8
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC30 minutes20,500 → 26,700at least +6,100666 → 666at most +1+136.5
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC30 minutes26,700 → 36,800at least +10,000666 → 666at most +1+223.8
/10215011 Oct 2026, 13:10 UTC30 minutes36,800 → 48,900at least +12,000666 → 666at most +1+268.5
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC30 minutes9,240 → 11,500at least +2,160623 → 623at most +1+48.3
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC35 minutes11,600 → 13,900at least +2,200623 → 623at most +1+49.2
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC35 minutes13,900 → 17,500at least +3,500623 → 623at most +1+78.3
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC30 minutes17,500 → 21,300at least +3,700623 → 623at most +1+82.8
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC30 minutes21,300 → 27,700at least +6,300623 → 623at most +1+141.0
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC30 minutes27,700 → 37,800at least +10,000623 → 623at most +1+223.8
/10215311 Oct 2026, 13:30 UTC64 minutes37,800 → 56,900at least +19,000623 → 623at most +1+425.1
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC30 minutes1,790 → 2,330at least +530295 → 296at most +2+11.9
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC30 minutes2,820 → 3,780at least +950298 → 299at most +2+21.3
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC45 minutes3,780 → 5,560at least +1,770299 → 299at most +1+39.6
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC34 minutes6,050 → 8,200at least +2,140299 → 299at most +1+47.9
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC51 minutes8,200 → 9,850at least +1,640299 → 299at most +1+36.7
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC35 minutes9,850 → 12,400at least +2,450299 → 299at most +1+54.8
/10278319 Oct 2026, 11:07 UTC30 minutes12,400 → 15,000at least +2,500299 → 299at most +1+55.9
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC30 minutes4,110 → 5,830at least +1,710292 → 292at most +1+38.3
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC35 minutes5,830 → 8,080at least +2,240292 → 292at most +1+50.1
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC30 minutes8,080 → 9,540at least +1,450292 → 292at most +1+32.4
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC35 minutes9,540 → 13,000at least +3,360292 → 292at most +1+75.2
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC65 minutes13,000 → 16,600at least +3,500292 → 292at most +1+78.3
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC30 minutes16,600 → 19,900at least +3,200292 → 292at most +1+71.6
/10281220 Oct 2026, 02:24 UTC35 minutes19,900 → 23,800at least +3,800292 → 292at most +1+85.0

Expected is the view gain multiplied by this channel’s own prior reactions-per-view rate over the same post — not a corpus average, so a channel whose audience never reacts is compared only against itself. Every interval is credited in the direction that makes the observation harder to record, never easier: t.me renders views and reactions to three significant figures above ~1,000, so a raw delta can be a rendering step. Every delta below is at least 4 x the coarser reading's step, the view gain is discounted by a full step and the reaction gain credited with one. Measured by tgregister velocity.py (our own t.me/s/ readings).

What this does and does not say. It says the two counters moved apart, by more than rounding and more than this channel’s own history predicts. It asserts no cause. Views arriving from outside Telegram, an embedded or forwarded copy of the post, and a burst of readers who simply do not react all produce this shape. This detector has recorded very few observations across the whole register, and its precision has not been measured; treat it as an anomaly worth looking at, not as a finding.

Recorded under the key view_reaction_decoupling, last confirmed 6 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

1,089,9331,588,4721,339,202.51,570,6197 August 20266 November 2026
121 measurements spanning 90 days, net +467,281. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,015,152–1,663,253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 121
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 04:101,570,619-2,888
5 Nov 2026, 13:341,573,507-904
5 Nov 2026, 00:561,574,411-2,531
4 Nov 2026, 17:041,576,942+201
4 Nov 2026, 01:011,576,741-1,020
3 Nov 2026, 13:371,577,761-1,053
3 Nov 2026, 02:461,578,814-797
2 Nov 2026, 14:261,579,611+530
2 Nov 2026, 00:361,579,081-866
1 Nov 2026, 15:361,579,947-108
31 Oct 2026, 22:161,580,055+777
31 Oct 2026, 17:261,579,278-917
30 Oct 2026, 23:291,580,195-21
30 Oct 2026, 18:281,580,216+1,006
30 Oct 2026, 00:271,579,210-170
29 Oct 2026, 21:411,579,380-698
28 Oct 2026, 22:561,580,078-77
28 Oct 2026, 21:371,580,155-549
27 Oct 2026, 22:561,580,704-779
27 Oct 2026, 18:561,581,483first reading

Engagement

7,539 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 219 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.01%
avg views ÷ 1,570,619 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,900
2,244 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2,254
of 7,539 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held7,539 (7 August 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total35,686,986
Reactions total790,436
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈60,900
Videos
≈5,810
Links
≈26,000

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 08s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

Computed from 2,258 of this channel’s own posts over the last 30 days (267 of the 24-hour readings behind this are interpolated, not measured directly): across 1,560 of this channel’s own posts with a clear reading, a typical one reaches half of its last-observed view count within 2.3 hours of being posted; a typical post has already reached 25.6% of its 24-hour view count within the first hour, and 89.3% within the first six; the median 24-hour reach across those posts is 16,300 views — 1.04% of this channel’s own subscriber count (90th percentile 33,000).

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/1043816 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC110 minutes – 10 minutes old2,370 views ~97 reactionsno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/1043806 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC37 minutes – 72 minutes old12,300 views ~109 reactions60 minutes: 12,020 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h23 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043796 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC39 minutes – 74 minutes old12,600 views ~102 reactions60 minutes: 11,815 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h17 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043786 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC312 minutes – 77 minutes old11,300 views ~103 reactions60 minutes: 10,498 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h21 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043776 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC312 minutes – 77 minutes old11,200 views ~102 reactions60 minutes: 10,851 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h20 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043766 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC314 minutes – 79 minutes old12,200 views ~107 reactions60 minutes: 11,307 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h24 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043756 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC316 minutes – 81 minutes old12,500 views ~112 reactions60 minutes: 11,904 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h21 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/1043746 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC316 minutes – 81 minutes old11,900 views ~108 reactions60 minutes: 11,776 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h19 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

213,118 reactions across 998 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤43,18820.3%
🎉21,0299.87%
🔥16,7087.84%
💯14,8296.96%
👍11,7415.51%
👏11,0205.17%
🥰8,6184.04%
😍8,1573.83%
🤩8,1293.81%
❤‍🔥7,5693.55%
🏆7,2273.39%
🙏6,6603.13%
🫡3,1581.48%
😇3,0751.44%
😎2,9831.40%
🤝2,9641.39%
🙉2,9611.39%
✍2,9381.38%
🙈2,9151.37%
😘2,9061.36%
9 further kinds24,34311.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 998 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 213,118 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 October 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 998 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hsbet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 October 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 66 of 2,254 posts held from the last 30 days (2.93%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 15:55 UTC≈2,370 views97 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

تراكمي يوم السبت و الاحد

😎13❤‍🔥11🙉11👍10🙈10🎉9🤗8🔥7

6 Nov 2026, 14:53 UTC≈12,300 views109 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙QP3U9

❤17🙉13🌚12👌11😍10😎10🕊9🏆8

6 Nov 2026, 14:50 UTC≈12,600 views102 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙ZXBU9

👏15💘12🤩12👌10😍10❤9🕊9🥰8

6 Nov 2026, 14:48 UTC≈11,300 views103 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘14🤩14👌11🕊11🫡11🏆9🥰9⚡8

6 Nov 2026, 14:47 UTC≈11,200 views102 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙JZU79

😇13🌚12🥰12🙊12🎉11🤗10👍7💯7

6 Nov 2026, 14:45 UTC≈12,200 views107 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙RS679

😘14❤‍🔥13👌13🙈13🔥11🕊10⚡8🤩8

6 Nov 2026, 14:44 UTC≈12,500 views112 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙QCN79

❤15❤‍🔥15🎃15🏆12🙏11🫡10😇10👍9

6 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC≈11,900 views108 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😇14❤13🙉12🌚11❤‍🔥10💘10🏆9🙏9

6 Nov 2026, 14:43 UTC≈10,700 views103 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤13🙉13😎12🏆11🥰10🌚9🙊9✍8

6 Nov 2026, 14:41 UTC≈11,800 views105 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙ESE79

🌚14✍13👏13❤‍🔥10🎉10🤩10🙊9🎃8

6 Nov 2026, 14:39 UTC≈11,800 views102 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

🪙7ZB79

🔥14🕊14❤12👍12😘12🤗8🙈8🏆7

6 Nov 2026, 14:38 UTC≈12,400 views101 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🎉14🎃13👍13⚡11🙏11🤗10🤝9🙉8

Showing the 12 most recent of 7,539 posts we hold for @hsbet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hsbet edited 24 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
4 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 43 posts on @hsbet as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
3 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
7.0 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
14

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

ONRYO - توقعات كرة القدم | مراهنات
@ONRYOBET · 164,727
#1
🦅 صقور الرهانات 🔥 تونسي LIVE
@maxtipbet · 4,255
#2
Arab Bet
@winwayMoney · 14,589
#3
🔥FIRE🔥
@MANWIN20 · 4,284
#4
DANI FOOT للمراهنات 🔥🔥🤑🤑
@danifootbet · 7,098
#5
SNIPER_BET
@sniper1xbeet · 18,152
#6
توقعات مباريات - 𝗛𝗔𝗞𝗜𝗠𝗜
@hakimi2222 · 1,029,903
#7
توقعات كرة القدم
@arabic2027 · 580,398
#8
توقعات - ZLATAN
@ZLATANNXX · 19,175
#9
🏆 الكابيتانو — 𝑬𝑳 𝑪𝑨𝑷𝑰𝑻𝑨𝑵𝑶
@captionbet · 31,711
#10
ملوك اللعبه 🤑🤑
@MRZG222 · 4,491
#11
ملوك التوقعات💰👑💰
@perfect0112 · 2,554
#12
DZZ
@dzz1200 · 7,489
#13
كابوزيا Kabuzia
@Kabuzia · 41,856
#14
OMAR BETT 💵SOUSSI💵🥇🏅🎖️
@Omarelhamdaoui · 37,138
#15
💸 CHAMALINO - توقعات 💸
@chamalinooo · 224,996
#16
SNIPER
@bcf555 · 25,961 (as read 12 August 2026)
#17
🅼🆁 𝘽𝙀𝙏
@MRBET2024 · 5,600
#18
SALHI _ صالحي
@salhi_pronostic · 96,627
#19
TENNIS BET 👑
@KingOfTennis00 · 42,730 (as read 12 August 2026)
#20
توقعات المراهنات الرياضية | Melbet Arabic
@scorebetts · 17,927
#21
1XBET NADAL 🔥🔥🔥
@tawqo3atrafa · 51,272
#22
Liver Bet
@tsggu · 35,574
#23
linebet_genral
@Linebet_genral · 1
#24
توقعات |مراهنات كرة القدم
@santabetss · 651,967
#25
STANBET_ توقعات
@stanbeetpronostic · 179,797
#26
أكواد توقعات مباريات 1XBET
@Betting_1xbett11 · 2,298
#27
توقعات الكرة | SAM2027
@samir2025_bets · 35,099
#28
تحليل و توقعات كرة القدم⚽
@Professeur_N1 · 3,229
#29
LUFFY BET 💻
@xbet_fifa1 · 6,119
#30
Sir Bet
@IRQ333 · 5,313
#31
LIAM BET
@LIAM15BET · 26,676
#32
(الربح من كرة القدم ) 4THPYRAMID 🇪🇬⚽️
@Fourth_pyramid_Channel · 6,474
#33
BOB BET
@baselBVIP55 · 139,846
#34
куυвι вєтѕ 🦊
@KyubiBets · 968
#35
توقعات 1XBET مضمونه | ملوك المراهنات
@fifa_1xbet99 · 12,638
#36
🗯𝘿𝙄𝙎𝘾𝙊𝘽𝙀𝙏𝙎🗯
@DISCOBETSGROUP · 6,564
#37
BAHMDAN _ باحمدان
@bahmdan · 754,471
#38
توقعات كرة القدم | KORARAB
@melbetar · 21,305
#39
NMS _ نمس
@nms_kech · 2,056
#40
𝑷𝑹𝑶𝑭𝑬𝑺𝑺𝑰𝑶𝑵𝑨𝑳 💸
@profeesional40 · 8,566
#41
توقعات مراهنات المباريات 🎯🏹🇵🇸
@GANDO221 · 4,163
#42
ttipx1
@ttipxx · 31
#43
ملوك التوقعات
@thelion011 · 1,566,760
#44
ملوك التوقعات️️ 🛜🟩
@Predicciones_VIP · 7,762
#45
Maria_ Sharapova
@WORLDMOREWIN · 1,431
#46
.
@RIFINOCHANNEL · 999
#47
توقعات | مرهنات 1XBET
@xbet_Betting · 5,894
#48
KING
@najjiking · 1,595
#49
نور الهداية✌️
@azkar2871 · 9,131
#50
Kora Win 🏆🔥
@KORAWIN1 · 15,916
#51
1X Pro Bet
@xprobetdzd · 4,049
#52
اكواد مباريات مضمونه | 1XBET
@hxgjbjk · 7,716
#53
اكواد 1XBet|توقعات مضمونه ❤️
@VIP_Football_1 · 6,287
#54
MONKEY BET
@monkeybet00 · 2,093
#55
El7OTWIN
@el7otwin · 6,410
#56
توقعات مباريات | كرة القدم
@iosqi · 17,852
#57
"يقين"
@musIim_1430 · 5,633
#58
GROUP-GORGINA
@groupgorgi · 5,614
#59
MONTASSER
@montasser_vip · 58,205
#60
SOGORO
@sogorofiiix · 57,763
#61
Xtreme WIN 🧠👀
@M_21322 · 16,322
#62
💰KTM _ توقعات 💰
@KTMBET12 · 209,256
#63
توقعات 1XBet| ارباح 1XBet 💯(eldosari Bet)
@BETTING_1XBET11 · 10,712
#64
FIX Matches Mimoun 🥎🔥💯⚽
@mimounvip1 · 2,334
#65
💸 التوقعات - MAROCINO 💸
@MAROCINOO · 2,154
#66
Abdallah Bet 🚀
@Abdallah_BET · 17,936
#67
⚽🅼🆁_🆁🅴🅳🅰_🅵🆁🅴🅴_🆃🅸🅿🆂📝⚽🏆توقعات
@BETXBET_MOROCCO · 180,897
#68
SHASA | شاسا
@shasazverev1 · 103,977
#69
SINS Bet ⚡️
@codestines · 4,557
#70
𝗔𝗥𝗧𝗛𝗨𝗥 𝗣𝗟𝗕𝗘𝗧𝗦.
@Arthur_PLbets · 54,424
#71
WOLF BET | ملوك التوقعات
@BET_AND_YOU1 · 4,829
#72

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

ONRYO - توقعات كرة القدم | مراهنات
@ONRYOBET · 164,727
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 15 August 2026
PRONOSTICO-SARA
@sarasara4455 · 32,203
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 2 September 2026
FST
@itsfst · 55,537
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 26 August 2026
OMAR BETT 💵SOUSSI💵🥇🏅🎖️
@Omarelhamdaoui · 37,138
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 26 August 2026
⚽🅼🆁_🆁🅴🅳🅰_🅵🆁🅴🅴_🆃🅸🅿🆂📝⚽🏆توقعات
@BETXBET_MOROCCO · 180,897
Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
Liver Bet
@tsggu · 35,574
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 2 September 2026
SNIPER_BET
@sniper1xbeet · 18,152
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 5 October 2026
SOGORO
@sogorofiiix · 57,763
Telegram ranks this channel #71 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 22 August 2026

This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 8 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“توقعات كرة القدم - HSBET” (@hsbet), 1,570,619 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hsbet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.