Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 痛の微信领域思路库

Channel

痛の微信领域思路库

@hshhd21

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

862subscribers

+189 since we began measuring on 15 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004437283881
TypeChannel
Username@hshhd21
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 28 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded15 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hshhd21

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

673862767.515 August 2026 — 673 subscribers16 August 2026 — 682 subscribers24 August 2026 — 709 subscribers31 August 2026 — 768 subscribers9 September 2026 — 835 subscribers17 September 2026 — 862 subscribers15 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 33 days, net +189. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 645–890 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 03:41862+27
9 Sept 2026, 10:59835+67
31 Aug 2026, 14:36768+59
24 Aug 2026, 20:04709+27
16 Aug 2026, 18:35682+9
15 Aug 2026, 07:46673first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 28 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

41 reactions across 13 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2458.5%
1536.6%
❤‍🔥12.44%
🥰12.44%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 00:30 UTC31 viewsread 15 August 2026

✉️ 还在找Telegram优质资源❓ 🔥 公益封号思路|开户查档|优质号商 🎁 免费福利|账号|靓号|NFT|红包 📚 精选优质频道,过滤虚假、欺诈及广告泛滥内容。 😃点击链接一键加入Telegram优质频道! https://t.me/addlist/X9wncGn-zNUyYWE9 https://t.me/addlist/X9wncGn-zNUyYWE9 👑 频道活人200+即可加入互推 联系:@lxzvip / @lingxuzibot 互推总部:@sheiai|交流群:@zaiwen 😃 各平台账号源头卡网 https://shop.yunyfk.com/shop/lingxuzi ⚠️ 此消息一小时后可删除,请勿秒删;多次秒删将踢出互推。

Signed 猫猫雨

14 Aug 2026, 16:20 UTC13 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🎁 典藏礼物 / 稀有用户名|全自动租赁机器人 ❓想体验典藏礼物、稀有用户名,又不想高价购买? 💰 低价格|多款式|低门槛 黑底礼物、猫咪、pepe、稀有用户名等丰富 NFT 款式,黑底礼物低至1-2u一个月,想租就租,轻松体验! ⚡ 全自动|操作简单|价格低|款式多 典藏礼物想租就租,稀有用户名轻松体验! ↓点击下方按钮一键跳转启动机器人和详细使用教程

Signed 猫猫雨

13 Aug 2026, 12:39 UTC108 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026

操你妈 这五个人待会挨个奖励反噬原包

🥰1

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

13 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC212 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Poll

下次更新什么微信思路?

  1. 真实违规2.0包法59%
  2. 强混淆包法20%
  3. 我要玩垃圾原包直接改违规词 不反噬我不玩20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍3

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

12 Aug 2026, 09:38 UTC152 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @CiTongFH

专注微信领域教学📱📱📱 ✅12.8陪伴徒 只教基础抓包和一些简单的原理 ✅28.8 入门徒 从基础到微进阶 让你能自己去写一些简单的包以及理解为什么这么写 ✅48.8 进阶徒 从跟着视频做不理解原理 到为什么这么做 这一步是为了什么 教你开始钻研微信响应体以及给予方向 ✅68.8关门弟子 我会的大部分理解都教给你 你发消息我看见=先回你 ✅88.8亲传 除以上外 我所有的微信理解 微信思路 对于微信新路子的研究想法教给你 给你好的研究方向 有新的思路方向思路会甩给你玩 ✔️128.8价位 至尊徒弟 除此之外QQ领域 也一起传授 全部教学 此价位开始出事了=我立场你帮你打人 ✔️188.8价位 手足徒弟 我淡圈之后我教你起频道赚钱 带你玩TG封号圈或者我的频道给你管理使用 出事=立场你 ⭐288.8价位 传代徒弟 这个价位无需质疑了 除了名字传代之外我在各圈子的履历 经验 为人处世在我退圈前都会对你进行教学 教你赚钱 你=第二个

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

11 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC108 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @CiTongFH

微信成品中国白号 ❤️❤️❤️一个 成品号 非外国号 @CiTongXinFei

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

10 Aug 2026, 11:52 UTC137 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @CiTongFH

置顶拜师价位 收点查档/封号徒 直接私信来问

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

10 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTC192 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026

市面上有很多人把原包改的花里胡哨 实际数据压根没法受理 要发就发点能受理能玩的东西

2👍2

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

10 Aug 2026, 09:27 UTC384 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
File

刺痛の微信双系统包法 对面三条聊天记录 源头:刺痛 倒卖二改死一家子 公益思路不做过多解答 打掉的话私信反馈 给我更新的动力 没看到反馈没动力更新 打法submit或者规避核验即可 需要拜师/定制思路的 本人唯一id:@CiTongXinFei 双向: @CiTongbot The text and images of this information are the acceptance receipt and successful lawsuit screenshots obtained by the law firm through normal legal proceedings, and do not violate any EU laws or Telegram Community Guidelines.

👍3

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

10 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC190 views5 reactionsread 15 August 2026

马上更新新思路

👍41

Signed 刺痛 源头极速查档

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @hshhd21. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

13 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTCAnonymous Poll74 voters

下次更新什么微信思路?

  1. 真实违规2.0包法59%
  2. 强混淆包法20%
  3. 我要玩垃圾原包直接改违规词 不反噬我不玩20%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 15 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“痛の微信领域思路库” (@hshhd21), 862 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hshhd21.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.