Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 【上海】沪上嫩妹甄选报告

Channel

【上海】沪上嫩妹甄选报告

@hsnmxczx999

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34,321subscribers

-4,185 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003748780133
TypeChannel
Username@hsnmxczx999
Description甄选通告: @hsnmtgb886 甄选大群:https://t.me/hsnmxczx666 甄选榜单:https://t.me/hsnmxczx888 甄选抽奖:https://t.me/hsnmxczx000 甄选黑榜:https://t.me/hsnmxczx777 上榜联系: @hsnmxcsbjjr_bot
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hsnmxczx999

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

33,12139,27636,198.56 August 2026 — 38,506 subscribers6 August 2026 — 38,506 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,578 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,645 subscribers10 August 2026 — 38,698 subscribers11 August 2026 — 38,746 subscribers12 August 2026 — 38,779 subscribers13 August 2026 — 38,820 subscribers14 August 2026 — 38,887 subscribers15 August 2026 — 39,056 subscribers17 August 2026 — 39,185 subscribers18 August 2026 — 39,174 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,120 subscribers20 August 2026 — 39,215 subscribers21 August 2026 — 39,276 subscribers23 August 2026 — 37,952 subscribers24 August 2026 — 33,121 subscribers25 August 2026 — 33,149 subscribers26 August 2026 — 33,182 subscribers27 August 2026 — 33,269 subscribers28 August 2026 — 33,357 subscribers29 August 2026 — 33,420 subscribers30 August 2026 — 33,481 subscribers31 August 2026 — 33,516 subscribers1 September 2026 — 33,482 subscribers2 September 2026 — 33,504 subscribers3 September 2026 — 33,557 subscribers6 September 2026 — 33,645 subscribers9 September 2026 — 33,649 subscribers11 September 2026 — 33,774 subscribers13 September 2026 — 33,797 subscribers15 September 2026 — 33,847 subscribers17 September 2026 — 34,321 subscribers34,3216 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4,185. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 32,198–40,199 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 14:1934,321+474
15 Sept 2026, 10:5933,847+50
13 Sept 2026, 19:1533,797+23
11 Sept 2026, 22:3833,774+125
9 Sept 2026, 11:2133,649+4
6 Sept 2026, 01:1933,645+88
3 Sept 2026, 22:3733,557+53
2 Sept 2026, 16:0833,504+22
1 Sept 2026, 13:2433,482-34
31 Aug 2026, 14:2333,516+35
30 Aug 2026, 17:0333,481+61
29 Aug 2026, 15:2233,420+63
28 Aug 2026, 14:2433,357+88
27 Aug 2026, 14:1233,269+87
26 Aug 2026, 12:4233,182+33
25 Aug 2026, 14:3433,149+28
24 Aug 2026, 16:5433,121-4,831
23 Aug 2026, 02:0537,952-1,324
21 Aug 2026, 15:5539,276+61
20 Aug 2026, 16:4339,215first reading

Engagement

291 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 86 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
0.412%
avg views ÷ 34,321 subscribers
Avg views / post
141
140 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.644%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
140
of 291 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 140 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held291 (4 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total19,778
Reactions total4
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
28
Links
699

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

10 reactions across 9 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤10100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 291 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 291 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 13:29 UTC42 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-26 【老师】:怡宝 【留名】:马斯克 【费用】:1000 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:今天约见老师见面后很满意,人照对版无差别一致,胸很大也也真实,服务也很不错,小穴紧致水多。口技术非常好,亲胸的时候老师也挺主动的,嫩粉的胸埋头就是了,具体在总结就是:全身嫩滑摸起来手感舒服,大胸一晃一晃的很大,服务方面如课表都有,老师性格方面也不错,小小嫩妹值得了,物有所值啊

26 Sept 2026, 13:29 UTC35 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-26 【老师】:iU 【留名】:khkjhknn 【费用】:1000 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:来到LS提供的地址,LS遥控上楼,一进门看到老师身材曼妙,算得上嫩妹极品了,交完水费迫不及待地一手就把老师搂入怀里,香气扑鼻,整个人都酥麻了!接着老师就帮我洗澡,开始服务了。老师口技算得上是一流,当进入到LS身体的时候,感受老师那热乎乎的体温,湿润来回的体验老师的爱,过程中也配合着一些姿势,在LS娇柔的喘息声,LS唯一遗憾的就是没舌吻来着,不过呢也很不错了。其他方面很厉害,下次还会二刷的

26 Sept 2026, 13:29 UTC36 views0 reactionsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-25 【老师】:小柔 【留名】:Ba Vii 【费用】:工兵 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:10 【过程】:人照99%一致,细腰硕果,过程中ls也很有小女友的感觉,小穴非常紧致,包裹感很强,过程中情绪价值给的也很足,即使出来的比较慢中途也不会催,满分十分可以打满分。

25 Sept 2026, 13:13 UTC118 viewsread 26 September 2026

【验证时间】:2026-09-24 【联系老师】: 【老师艺名】:小慧同学 【验证留名】:tonychen 【颜值评分】:9 【人照评分】:8 【身材评分】:9 【科室环境】:8 【服务评分】:9 【态度评分】:9 【出击金额】:1100P 【推荐指数】:⭐⭐⭐⭐ 【约课记录】: 【服务过程】昨天9.23日,课室挺好找,老校区不能停车,老师指导停对面酒店了了。 进门看见小慧同学比照片更小只,很稚嫩。闲聊几句,洗白白去,浴室很小就一个人洗了,小慧会边上等着递浴巾和漱口水,当然也是果着了,细支硕果绝对准确的形容,比照片更瘦小,大白兔白又嫩😍应该下海不久,因为之后aiai经验不足,姿势要自己调教,女上不太会,但是性格温柔,原意配合各种姿势,不过极限有限,小慧同学明显运动少,柔韧性差点,腿不能扛上肩😃大家多来给小慧多做运动,多拉伸。大白兔真是软糯香甜,上下口都很小,小👅很滑很软,多吸有甜味,口的很舒服。下口也很小很水,不换姿势可能一冲刺…

25 Sept 2026, 13:09 UTC87 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-25 【老师】:林咻咻 【留名】:茂 茂 【费用】:1000p 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.5 【过程】:到了遥控上楼,开门看见老师小小只的很可爱,进门后小狼也是迫不及待,边脱边聊天,ls给人一种很羞涩的感觉,洗澡yyy还有szx,三点口开始 96无异味,蛇不是很主动但你要就管够,再具体的就不说了,还有全程声音反馈很好很真实,这点小狼很喜欢。

25 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC328 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-24 【老师】:小柔 【留名】:泡泡🐉 【费用】:1200 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:10 【颜值】:10 【身材】:10 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.83 【过程】:人照一致,参考验证视频。高个大长腿,细枝硕果,进门一对大灯吸引眼球,服务无可挑剔,怎么说,老师怎么做。做到了课表一致,ls 很嫩,水也多,进入包裹感很强,gc时能不断吸吮,反馈很强烈。值得拥有,必复刷,推荐

25 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC68 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-25 【老师】:iU 【留名】:Brian 【费用】:900pp 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:8 【服务】:9 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:8.83 【过程】:昨天抢到iu的工兵 问过老师说满客了 约的今天 果断出击 遥控上楼以后见了老师 人照差距不大 寒暄几句以后洗澡进入正题 女上还是比较卖力的,然后自由发挥。姿势都很配合,看着背后的吊睛白额大虫,感觉更佳。再切磋了一下武艺以后,败下阵来。

25 Sept 2026, 09:24 UTC58 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-21 【老师】:小猴子 【留名】:神秘 调查员 【费用】:1000 【评价】:👌 中评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:7 【态度】:8 【环境】:8 【综合】:7.83 【过程】:老是在一个老小区里面,位置不难找,科室比较宽敞,可惜没有一次性床单,人照基本一致,比较矮小,胸a,有一点点纹身,先交水费,然后洗澡躺床上先3点口,然后女上,然后cjs,123出货,因为是嫩妹,没什么服务,但态度还可以

25 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC48 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-24 【老师】:怡宝 【留名】:冈本十三狼 【费用】:1700 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:10 【态度】:10 【环境】:9 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:怡宝老师gzs很好找,昨天和老师约定好了时间,约上了预留时间cj了,真人真照,本人有点幼态,嫩妹一枚,妹妹爱干净,身上香香的。怡宝老师属于耐看型娇小可爱,身高167的样子,体重偏轻身材苗条,胸部蛮大的,有C了,胸部真实无科技。老师技术生疏,这个能理解,毕竟属于小嫩妹没有经验正常。老师叫床声十分动听萌萌的,bb紧致,水多,粉嫩的,这也是嫩妹的优点之一,各种床上姿势配合,一对大胸真的是手感完美。还是很不错的,给5星好评⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

25 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC44 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-25 【老师】:小禾 【留名】:深情生蚝 【费用】:600工 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:9 【服务】:9 【态度】:10 【环境】:10 【综合】:9.33 【过程】:首先感恩老天的眷顾和小禾ls的付出,在中秋佳节之际有幸遇到这么好的ls。进门一见如故嫩妹一枚,简单聊了几句,就进入正题。女上奢求不多,后入直观感受非常棒的腰臀比。ls事先声明不耐桩,所以每种姿势浅尝辄止。cjs刚进入,ls有点不舒服,让我放心后,小心翼翼的123,熟悉之后慢慢进入高潮,最后有点不好意思的把枕头弄湿了一片。总结这是非常值得嫩妹体验,推荐给到夯。

25 Sept 2026, 09:23 UTC57 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-25 【老师】:姜姜 【留名】:Romance Lee 【费用】:p 【评价】:👌 中评 【人照】:8 【颜值】:8 【身材】:8 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:8 【综合】:8.17 【过程】:新上的姜姜,预约前往,过程略有曲折,人照有一定相似度,美颜过,是个嫩妹,身材苗条型,皮肤偏黄,自述刚下海不久,服务鸳鸯浴三点口,做爱姿势配合,叫声会说骚话爸爸干的好深之类,喜欢嫩妹可打卡

24 Sept 2026, 16:36 UTC360 viewsread 26 September 2026

【时间】:2026-09-24 【老师】:怡宝 【留名】:面具🎭 【已老实】 【费用】:p 【评价】:👍 好评 【人照】:9 【颜值】:9 【身材】:10 【服务】:8 【态度】:9 【环境】:9 【综合】:9 【过程】:妹妹晚上下课比较早,几次没约上,等完了红休,又被哪个厨神弄伤了,好在终于吃上了,体验很不错。 新换的课室很近,安全性较高。妹妹留好门,上楼直接进。 妹妹在客厅坐着,人照一致,照片有些美白,貌似妹妹今天素颜开课。巴掌脸,无敌嫩,大长腿,胸得脱了衣服才显大。 和妹妹抽烟聊了会,然后自己去洗了,妹妹说洗过,就没要求陪浴(后面做完妹妹洗得很仔细)! 到房间看房间黑黑的,把灯按开了,妹妹脱完衣服身材显露无余。高个大长腿,身材苗条,这个胸真漂亮,大而不垂,妹妹看我在欣赏,赶紧把手护在胸前,说是开灯放不开,房间重回黑暗,还好穿在有余光。 上床先服务妹妹一番,简单小蛇一番,主要把玩这对漂亮大白兔,手感相当哇塞,乳头也…

Showing the 12 most recent of 291 posts we hold for @hsnmxczx999. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“【上海】沪上嫩妹甄选报告” (@hsnmxczx999), 34,321 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hsnmxczx999.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.