Channel
@httpqxx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
576subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002033939457 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @httpqxx |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/httpqxx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Aug 2026, 22:55 | 576 | +4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 04:33 | 572 | +2 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 570 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:16 | 565 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 565 | first reading |
13 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 13 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
283 reactions across 12 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5300991538875083748 | 106 | 37.5% | |
| custom 5301167718433568360 | 91 | 32.2% | |
| custom 5440698819194928001 | 86 | 30.4% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 283reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
promo for PLAYEROK prod + motion design lead ai by @twn.gntv motion design by me + @helmutbergwand sound design by @dirtyiice + @damn_where_did_u_find_this #портфолио
custom 530099153887508374816custom 544069881919492800111custom 53011677184335683607
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53011677184335683609custom 54406988191949280016custom 53009915388750837484
ох этот фейм 🤩 сегодня наконец то дропнула эту работу в инст (httpqx) мы сделали эту рекламу примерно за 3 недели с 0, один из моих самых сильных кейсов было не много страшно брать большую ответственность но все получилось! сейчас закину сюда 🤩
custom 53011677184335683607custom 54406988191949280017custom 53009915388750837485
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 530116771843356836016custom 530099153887508374814custom 544069881919492800112
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 530099153887508374812custom 54406988191949280016custom 53011677184335683605
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 530116771843356836018custom 530099153887508374811custom 54406988191949280016
окей я подружилась с давинчи, я признаю, тема прога
custom 530099153887508374810custom 544069881919492800110custom 53011677184335683604
Voice message, posted without a caption
custom 53009915388750837488custom 54406988191949280014custom 53011677184335683603
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 53009915388750837489custom 54406988191949280013
если я скажу что это по работе, вы мне поверите?
дорогие подписчики у меня дилема. меня на днях АХУИТИТЕЛЬНО сфоткала галя и я хочу сделать пост в фотками, и недавно я взяла за фишку делать на своих фотках с лицом всякие прикольные эффекты и рисуночки но именно эти фотки как будто на столько хороши что там даже ничего и не надо вопрос - оставляем или накидываем сексов?
custom 530116771843356836022custom 544069881919492800110custom 53009915388750837485
можно повозку с лошадьми…
custom 544069881919492800111
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @httpqxx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 228,953 of 1,626,711entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@httpqxx named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“юля хттпс” (@httpqxx), 576 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/httpqxx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.