各位读者,在可预见或不可预见的未来中,自杀都是一种非常有效的消灭痛苦的手段。尤其是穷人,结束自己物质匮乏的一生是具有价值的。请各位不要过度忧虑,一个具有自杀手段的人是具备非常强大的尊严的。 如若再度出现上世纪的情况、如若文明世界不再存在、如若你不想活了,阅读这本书并且踏出那一步。这是理性的选择。

Channel
Huang Blog
@huangblog
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001610793443 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @huangblog |
| Description | 非理性传统的继承者(Successor of Irrationalism) Huang Blog 评论区与推送源,欢迎讨论。 Main Site: https://xn--29s704loyd.com Tech Blog: https://huangblog.com |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 December 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/huangblog |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:22 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 31 December 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 68
- Links
- 75
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
File, posted without a caption
博客暂停更新……作者正在重构思想与知识体系,尽请期待后续博客。 https://telegra.ph/Notice-04-23-4
#eEssay HuangBlog: Across Ego Telegraph: Across Ego Open your eyes, don’t drown in illusions.
#Essay 原文链接:碎碎念 Telegraph:碎碎念 如果有人给我做精神分析的话,会发现一个弱小、单纯的灵魂。它太过弱小以至于无法做到任何事情;它希望成为“在风暴中越烧越旺的熊熊烈火”,而非“在风中熄灭的蜡烛”。
#eEssay HuangBlog: Don't be fooled Telegraph: Don't be fooled Life is long as always, don't worry too much for now.
#Essay 原文链接:同一性的幻梦 Telegraph:同一性的幻梦 如果一切都按我这么推理,那么世界就没有重要的东西。但是我在文章中隐含地说明了『生命的根基』,然而我却无法说清楚,导致文章显得有一定的普通虚无主义倾向。
#eEssay HuangBlog: Give Me Your Name Telegraph: Give Me Your Name Who am I asking for?
#eEssay HuangBlog: Journal about Rambling Telegraph: Journal about Rambling I would stay if I could try to make it look good, but it's hard to be pretty in pain.
#eEssay 原文链接:What are the Masses? Telegraph:What are the Masses? Morning or night, Friday or Sunday, made no difference, everything was the same: the gnawing, excruciating, incessant pain; that awareness of life irrevocably passing but not yet gone; that dreadful, loathsome death, the only reality, relentlessly closing in on him; and that same endless lie. What did days, weeks, or hours matter?
我需要再等等吗?
“问客”诞生,第四次工业革命才算石锤了 2023-03-06 11:55:00 by 奥泊城的珍宝 新职业的诞生,总是因为有新技术的出现。即使人类最早的职业——农民,也是在新石器时代,伴随着有了打磨成型的石头而产生的。 再往后看,第一次工业革命时代的纺织工人,发报员,第二次工业革命时代的电工,列车员,第三次工业革命时代的打字员,程序员,也都是如此。 有意思的是,时代和职业,其实是互相成就的。我们既可以说新产业变革创造了新的职业。也可以从另外一个角度说,出现了新的职业,或者完全重塑了旧职业,才能叫进入了一个真正的产业新时代。 10年前,从德国提出工业4.0(2013年)开始,一种“我们已经进入以人工智能技术等驱动的第四次工业革命”的提法流行开来。 但是,这个第四次工业革命,和同样是信息技术驱动的第三次工业革命,其实一直以来界限都非常的模糊。似乎是个被“工业4.0”概念催生出来的产物。 很重要的一点是,在…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @huangblog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Huang Blog” (@huangblog), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huangblog.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.