Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 96% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 15,534–15,787 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 17:20
15,758
+37
17 Sept 2026, 04:18
15,721
+21
15 Sept 2026, 02:16
15,700
+16
13 Sept 2026, 09:59
15,684
+21
11 Sept 2026, 15:19
15,663
+5
8 Sept 2026, 23:42
15,658
-7
5 Sept 2026, 16:19
15,665
+1
3 Sept 2026, 19:16
15,664
+16
2 Sept 2026, 10:56
15,648
-9
1 Sept 2026, 09:57
15,657
+21
31 Aug 2026, 13:16
15,636
+3
30 Aug 2026, 10:35
15,633
+18
29 Aug 2026, 07:15
15,615
+13
28 Aug 2026, 09:38
15,602
+24
27 Aug 2026, 06:52
15,578
+8
26 Aug 2026, 07:54
15,570
+7
25 Aug 2026, 10:53
15,563
-26
24 Aug 2026, 07:35
15,589
+2
22 Aug 2026, 12:34
15,587
+15
20 Aug 2026, 23:38
15,572
first reading
Engagement
119 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
25.9%
avg views ÷ 15,758 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,090
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 119 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held
119 (3 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total
171,580
Reactions total
1,682
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:20 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 53s
Average length
25s
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,621 reactions across 115 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤬
1,595
28.4%
❤
842
15.0%
😢
456
8.11%
🙏
393
6.99%
😁
390
6.94%
👍
312
5.55%
🤡
296
5.27%
💩
225
4.00%
🤮
180
3.20%
💯
142
2.53%
🤯
141
2.51%
👏
90
1.60%
❤🔥
82
1.46%
🤣
76
1.35%
🔥
56
0.996%
👎
54
0.961%
🥰
38
0.676%
😱
37
0.658%
🙉
31
0.552%
🤔
31
0.552%
29 further kinds
154
2.74%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 119 of the 119 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,864 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 119 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚌 Невже дожили: на «кільце» випускають нові автобуси, а іржаві «Рути» обіцяють прибрати!
З початком осені перевізники нарешті викотили два нові баси середнього класу. Один MAN від Лупаєнка поїхав на 22-й маршрут, а шведський Ikarus від Костова пустили на 21-й. Обіцяють додати ще п'ять штук. У транспортному відділі божаться, що скоро проведуть конкурс і тепер вимагатимуть від перевізників працюючі кондеї та мінімум 3…
Тривога хуячить, а лінійка в Полтавській політехніці й не думає припинятись!
Сьогодні, наприклад, прилетіло по університету в Києві. На щастя, всі студенти були в укриттях.
А в строяку шо?
Підпишись І Хуевая Полтава 🖤
Сьогодні у Ботанічному саду ПНПУ імені В. Г. Короленка відкрили пам’ятник англійському драматургу Вільяму Шекспіру.
Також у Шекспірівському саду встановили та відкрили сонячний годинник.
За словами організаторів, це перший в Україні пам’ятник Вільяму Шекспіру.
Підпишись І Хуевая Полтава 🖤
🏗 Прощавай, «Алмаз»: на місці закинутого кінотеатру вліплять чергові бетонні мурашники!
Міськрада нарешті показала, як саме забудують 5 гектарів на Алмазному. «Полтавтрансбуд» вліпить там чотири 10-поверхові коробки з комерцією на перших поверхах. Обіцяють, звісно, і підземний паркінг, і красиві майданчики, але є один величезний нюанс.
А хтось подумав про додаткову інфраструктуру?))) Звісно ж, ні. Зате забудовник з…
🤬 Падіння БпЛА під Полтавою: поранено 65-річну жінку, потрощено хату та авто!
Русня продовжує тероризувати мирних людей. У Полтавському районі ворожий дрон гепнувся на відкритій місцевості, але вибухова хвиля наробила лиха: повибивало шибки в приватному будинку та побило автівку.
Постраждала 65-річна жінка — її з травмами терміново забрали до лікарні. Бажаємо якнайшвидшого одужання! Якщо у вас через цю атаку теж по…
В НАШЕ СЕЛО ПРИЇХАЛА АНДЖЕЛІНА ДЖОЛІ.
Голлівудську акторку помітили за сніданком у полтавському готелі Палаццо.
Відразу покажіть їй маршрут безбар'єрності Ямщикової))
Підпишись І Хуевая Полтава 🖤
За оновленими даними, 1 вересня ворог завдав удару по одному з колишніх підприємств Полтави, використавши дві малогабаритні крилаті ракети S 8000 «Бандероль». Унаслідок влучання зруйновано частину складської будівлі.
Наразі відомо вже про чотирьох поранених мирних мешканців: 19-річного юнака, двох 32-річних чоловіків та 44-річну жінку. Усім потерпілим надається необхідна медична допомога.
Підпишись І Хуевая Полтава…
🤬 Наслідки ранкового прильоту: четверо поранених та потрощені багатоповерхівки!
Русняві «Бандеролі» не лише влучили у підприємство, а й наробили біди в житловому секторі. Від потужної вибухової хвилі повилітали вікна у трьох сусідніх багатоповерхівках. Кількість постраждалих містян зросла до чотирьох, медики вже надають їм допомогу.
Зараз на місці працює штаб — людям роздають плівку та OSB-плити, щоб забити дірки з…
🤡 Полтаву сколихнула новина про вручення підозр депутату обласної ради та члену виконавчого комітету міської ради Чепурку, депутату міськради Диканю та заступнику міського голови та керівнику управління ЖКГ Панасенку.
Минула доба, але ані меркиня Катерина Ямщикова, за яку не голосували, як за мера, ані її чоловік та депутат Вадим Ямщиков не сказали з цього приводу ані слова))
Ще можна зрозуміти, що вони не хочуть к…
Showing the 12 most recent of 119 posts we hold for @huevajapoltava. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Фонтан за мільйон Полтава @fontan1000000 · 22,998 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 19 September 2026
VPLT @v_plt · 26,025 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
PVP.POLTAVA @poltava_pvp · 109,468 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 August 2026
ПОЛТАВА НОВИНИ | СИРЕНА @region_poltava_syrena · 193,955 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 11 August 2026
ПЕРША ЧЕРГА, 1 ПІДГРУПА💡 ПОЛТАВСЬКА ОБЛАСТЬ @mo3ambik_gpv_1 · 26,287 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 September 2026
ТРЕТЯ ЧЕРГА, 1 ПІДГРУПА💡 ПОЛТАВСЬКА ОБЛАСТЬ @mo3ambik_gpv_3 · 26,790 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 11 September 2026
МОЗАМБІК.МЕДІА: Лубни, Пирятин, Хорол, Гребінка, Оржиця @mo3ambik · 35,750 Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Труха⚡️Полтава @truexapoltava · 301,637 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
ППО Полтавщина: Нічні мисливці @ppo_Poltava · 33,802 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 4 September 2026
Полтава ⚡️Новини @poltava_insider · 22,528 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 20 September 2026
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хуевая Полтава 🖤” (@huevajapoltava), 15,758 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huevajapoltava.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.