Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐇𝐔𝐆𝐀𝐃𝐎_𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘

Channel

𝐇𝐔𝐆𝐀𝐃𝐎_𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘

@huga_cos

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

98subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002555634792
TypeChannel
Username@huga_cos
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/huga_cos

Growth

9098948 August 2026 — 91 subscribers9 August 2026 — 91 subscribers17 August 2026 — 90 subscribers24 August 2026 — 92 subscribers31 August 2026 — 98 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 89–99 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 03:2598+6
24 Aug 2026, 07:0492+2
17 Aug 2026, 09:4390-1
9 Aug 2026, 14:0291no change
8 Aug 2026, 11:0591first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 6 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
32s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

87 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2731.0%
🔥2528.7%
custom 52695538943918373171112.6%
🥰910.3%
❤‍🔥55.75%
🍓44.60%
custom 526960172314764575822.30%
💘22.30%
custom 524247339974108512011.15%
🍾11.15%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 6 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 6 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:10 UTC17 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cosp_hitory_amiPhoto

Вчера выходили с hugado и shimjanie погулять и поснимать контента в тгк и тик ток. Столько всякого увидели, начиная с драки в парке и заканчивая странными людьми, однако от прогулки только положительные впечатления из-за общего веселья и комплиментов от людей ✨ Чуть позже будет контент в виде красивых фоточек, а пока можете посмотреть в тик токе новое видео с ИванТиллами~

3custom 52696017231476457582🔥1🥰1custom 52424733997410851201custom 52695538943918373171

5 Aug 2026, 18:52 UTC22 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @gagarina_writePhoto

Внимание на котика! Это 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 Вас 600! Шесть сотен роднулек! Спасибо вам большое за подписку, за поддержку моего творчества! 💓 Как и обещала: в честь любимых подписчиков, объявляю розыгрыш бесплатной фотосессии ‼️ В ЧЁМ СУТЬ: Разыгрываю бесплатное участие в индивидуальном проекте, по вашей идее или с предоставлением полностью готового образа и реквизита. Мои услуги фотографа или видеографа бесплатно! Вариант

1

29 Jul 2026, 17:41 UTC165 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🌟🌟✨✨✨✨🤩✨✨✨🌟🌟 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🤩🤩 "When the cameras are 🤩🤩🤩off and the stage goes 🤩🤩dark, it's just you and me in this room. And that's all I'll ever need." 🤩Mizi - Huga 🤩Sua - LINova 🤩Ph - shimjanie

🔥116❤‍🔥5🍓3💘2

28 Jul 2026, 21:40 UTC76 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @shimjanie_cosVideo

сегодня с любимыми детьми сняли тренд, кое как выучив движения за 5 минут, но вышло прикольно🌅 Мизи Суа Тилл

🔥74🥰3🍓1🍾1

28 Jul 2026, 12:37 UTC161 views20 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мы с любимыми shimjanie и LINova выбрались погулять🌟🌟

11🥰5🔥4

24 Jul 2026, 15:24 UTC508 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

😘😀🙃🥲😃😀😘😀 Опять оттянула вообще все что могла по максимумму ну а что поделать я чучут еблан😱😱 Танибата прошла,было очень весело,но высказываться как либо о фестах я не мастер,так что просто поверьте что все было класно,выступили,пофоткались,повайбовали,поболтали,спасибо всем больше за эти несколько дней,особенно LINova с коттрой мы ходили все 2 дня ,Хитори , shimjanie с которыми мы тоже тусили и всему касту Дурдом Мил

custom 5269553894391837317102🔥2

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @huga_cos. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐇𝐔𝐆𝐀𝐃𝐎_𝐂𝐎𝐒𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘” (@huga_cos), 98 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huga_cos.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.