Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Humanode Announcements

Channel

Humanode Announcements

@humanode

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,722subscribers

-265 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001413462970
TypeChannel
Username@humanode
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 31 October 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live4 September 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/humanode

Growth

11,72211,98711,854.56 August 2026 — 11,987 subscribers7 August 2026 — 11,987 subscribers8 August 2026 — 11,978 subscribers9 August 2026 — 11,970 subscribers10 August 2026 — 11,958 subscribers11 August 2026 — 11,952 subscribers12 August 2026 — 11,944 subscribers13 August 2026 — 11,939 subscribers14 August 2026 — 11,937 subscribers15 August 2026 — 11,930 subscribers17 August 2026 — 11,920 subscribers18 August 2026 — 11,908 subscribers19 August 2026 — 11,900 subscribers20 August 2026 — 11,888 subscribers21 August 2026 — 11,881 subscribers23 August 2026 — 11,856 subscribers24 August 2026 — 11,830 subscribers25 August 2026 — 11,818 subscribers26 August 2026 — 11,810 subscribers27 August 2026 — 11,802 subscribers28 August 2026 — 11,796 subscribers29 August 2026 — 11,786 subscribers30 August 2026 — 11,775 subscribers31 August 2026 — 11,767 subscribers1 September 2026 — 11,752 subscribers3 September 2026 — 11,732 subscribers4 September 2026 — 11,722 subscribers6 August 20264 September 2026
27 measurements spanning 29 days, net -265. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,682–12,027 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Sept 2026, 21:2011,722-10
3 Sept 2026, 07:0511,732-20
1 Sept 2026, 23:1611,752-15
31 Aug 2026, 23:5711,767-8
30 Aug 2026, 23:3611,775-11
29 Aug 2026, 20:3511,786-10
28 Aug 2026, 17:4811,796-6
27 Aug 2026, 15:1711,802-8
26 Aug 2026, 15:2311,810-8
25 Aug 2026, 17:0511,818-12
24 Aug 2026, 19:1711,830-26
23 Aug 2026, 03:4111,856-25
21 Aug 2026, 17:0611,881-7
20 Aug 2026, 13:1511,888-12
19 Aug 2026, 10:3611,900-8
18 Aug 2026, 10:5411,908-12
17 Aug 2026, 10:3911,920-10
15 Aug 2026, 20:3411,930-7
14 Aug 2026, 08:0811,937-2
13 Aug 2026, 00:3411,939first reading

Engagement

35 posts held, back to 1 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.83%
avg views ÷ 11,722 subscribers
Avg views / post
214
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.84%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 35 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held35 (1 July 20261 September 2026)
Views total2,996
Reactions total85
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 23:42 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 28s
Average length
15s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

204 reactions across 33 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
12159.3%
🔥2612.7%
2210.8%
❤‍🔥178.33%
👍178.33%
🤣10.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 35 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 204 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 35 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 1 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 17:04 UTC73 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Street robbery collapsed in the West because banks could get stolen money back. Crypto rebuilt this feature and called it instant finality. Why blockchains are still bad rails for everyday economy - more reasons in the new podcast with Alex McFarlane of Keyring Network: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Cnb6X9055yg

21

31 Aug 2026, 18:01 UTC123 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Happy Monday! How about starting the week with a new term for your governance vocabulary?

🔥31

27 Aug 2026, 12:22 UTC231 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Ever tried keeping up with every governance proposal while also having a life? IOG’s Leios update today reports major throughput gains in testing. Meanwhile, Cardano’s committee renewal vote still needs more support before September 1. For anyone designing governance, there’s a broader question here: how much of your time should having a say actually cost? Humanode’s Vortex starts with one equal base vote per elig

4

26 Aug 2026, 14:15 UTC209 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Another Thursday, another excuse to actually find out what’s been going on around Humanode without piecing it together from 37 different posts. The Humanode Community Call is happening this Thursday, August 27. As always, you can jump on stage, ask the founders questions, and share feedback. Thursday, August 27 14:00 UTC https://discord.gg/rKBwtAtS4?event=1467927462011994387

4🔥2

25 Aug 2026, 11:40 UTC209 views6 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Humanode Newsletter Vol. 122 is live! August brought a big Vortex milestone and plenty happening across the ecosystem: ⚖️ Vortex Alpha v0.3 introduces Courts 🧬 Humanode’s privacy model for proof of unique human 🎯 BotKiller turns the anti-bot thesis into an onchain browser game 🎮 Catacomb Crawlers launches on iOS 🗳 New thinking on skin in the game, representation, and governance 📊 Why prediction markets need to

42

24 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC200 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Happy Monday, everyone! Starting the week with a little something from Vortexopedia for this week’s learning.

👍52

21 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC181 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Crypto was supposed to cut intermediaries. Sometimes elected representatives are these intermediaries worth cutting. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PwPv139Xpjo

4🔥21

20 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC155 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

With AI agents everywhere, proving you are human has become more urgent than ever. Inside crypto, that creates a harder problem. Users were taught never to reveal which human they are, so proof of personhood has to establish uniqueness without giving away pseudonymity. Humanode’s privacy model starts with one narrow question: is a living, unique human behind this account? The real questions begin after the scan. W

5🔥2

19 Aug 2026, 14:08 UTC291 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Vortex now has a place for reports that proposals and votes cannot resolve. Yes, Vortex Alpha v0.3 introduces "Courts", connecting contextual reports to structured cases, twelve-Governor panels, protected evidence, Codex-guided findings and remedies, appeals, reopening, and reversible enforcement. The implementation is ready for review and remains behind an activation gate until its operational release is approved.

🔥43

18 Aug 2026, 14:12 UTC272 views8 reactionsread 2 September 2026

Markets can count wallets. They still cannot tell you how many people are speaking. According to Reuters, midterm prediction-market volume has already passed the entire 2024 congressional cycle. But a relatively small group of wallets accounts for most of the trading. Prediction markets were built to aggregate human judgment. If the market is meant to reflect public judgment, shouldn’t it know how many people are

❤‍🔥53

17 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC250 views7 reactionsread 2 September 2026

What if the biggest problem with crypto isn’t that the system is broken, but that we’ve been trained to accept it as normal? Financial systems reward those who already have influence. Crypto was supposed to challenge that logic. But has it? This opinion piece looks at the less comfortable side of the crypto economy: the habits, incentives, and power structures we’ve learned to accept without questioning. If dece

7

Showing the 12 most recent of 35 posts we hold for @humanode. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Self Chain
@selfchainxyz · 108,629
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 14 August 2026
ZNS Connect Name Service
@znsconnect · 45,704
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Humanode Announcements” (@humanode), 11,722 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/humanode.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.