Самые совершенные из женщин – это те, которые сильнее других обладают стыдливостью и целомудрием.

Channel
Напоминание:
@hushiun
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,592subscribers
+71 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002022152793 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hushiun |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 32 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hushiun |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Sept 2026, 05:21 | 16,592 | -4 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 05:39 | 16,596 | -25 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 15:16 | 16,621 | +10 |
| 10 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 16,611 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 13:21 | 16,622 | +5 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 02:58 | 16,617 | +7 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:17 | 16,610 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 03:15 | 16,613 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 16,611 | +3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 04:47 | 16,608 | +4 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:12 | 16,604 | +10 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 16,594 | +22 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 02:38 | 16,572 | +32 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 03:11 | 16,540 | +7 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 16,533 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:35 | 16,540 | -12 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 16:34 | 16,552 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 10:02 | 16,549 | +2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 10:03 | 16,547 | -10 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 07:35 | 16,557 | first reading |
Engagement
77 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 54 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 30.9%
- avg views ÷ 16,592 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 5,130
- 26 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 26
- of 77 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 26 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 77 (3 July 2026 – 2 September 2026) |
| Views total | 133,300 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Sept 2026, 09:46 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 368
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 73
- of 77 we hold a reading for · 95%
- Most on one post
- 33
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hushiun. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 77 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Оберегание языка от лишних слов – это мудрость.
На рассвете Коран читают при свидетелях (ангелах).
Кто больше обладает знанием об Аллахе, тот больше боится Его.
Остерегайся любого дела, за которое тебе потом придётся оправдываться.
Указавшему на благое полагается такая же награда, как и совершившему его.
Как только освободишься, будь деятелен и устремись к своему Господу.
О Аллах, пусть этот дождь принесёт пользу! اللَّهُمَّ صَيِّبًا نَافِعًا Аллох’умма соййибан наафи’аа
Никогда не преуменьшайте значения своих грехов, ведь если они соберутся в одном человеке, то погубят его.
Прославляй хвалой своего Господа, когда поднимаешься ото сна.
Поминание Аллаха (азкары) защищает верующего от зла, сглаза, порчи и козней шайтана.
Не забывай, что в последний час ‘асра ду’а не отвергается.
Showing the 12 most recent of 77 posts we hold for @hushiun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@FASH42 · 12914 postsتذكير🩶
@aashvn · 1254 postsالهدى
@islamm_videoo · 4613 posts𝘼𝙝𝙡𝙞 𝙎𝙪𝙣𝙣𝙖𝙝 𝙬𝙖𝙡 𝙅𝙖𝙢𝙖’𝙖
@Ahli_Sunnah01 · 332 postsLanselot
@GB_Lanselot · 1282 postsالتواضع
@smireniie · 892 postsуповаنие
@tmmmiii · 352 postsAbc.my.aesthetics
@abcmyaesthetics · 651 post𝕀𝕤𝕝𝕒𝕞𝕤𝕜𝕚𝕖
@avavavav_13 · 2681 postаятyль
@ayatullhadj · 1,3071 postbina
@binulliik · 1301 postя - чувство.
@deesiiderio · 831 postMemoriesNeverDie.
@gulsblog · 151 postzametki mki
@lifevzaymi · 1371 postMEDulla
@medullachanal · 2111 postreminder
@napominayuz · 1831 postУлус Ногая/Nogai Ulus
@nogai_ulus · 3091 postот сердца к слову'
@podush1eee · 1681 postP2P Подвал
@podvalp2p · 971 postFatha | فتحا
@pominaem · 1201 postthe best we can say
@prayandtrustt · 1661 postКлементина 🍊
@rayekhantia · 2221 postMaryam's thoughts
@sabrmeee · 781 postSs
@sssaaffi · 1381 postᴀбᴄᴛᴩᴀᴋᴛнᴀя.
@tolkosestra · 8871 post`م
@ummrvvvn · 1501 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@SABR_ISLAMI · 29,736
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 7 September 2026
@mutawwa · 45,655
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@l114koran · 30,973
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 6 September 2026
@Luhaiidan · 45,539
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 27 August 2026
@neboo11 · 48,807
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 26 August 2026
@vayshi1 · 25,809
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 13 September 2026
@soplemenic · 29,832
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 7 September 2026
@arabskiecitati · 23,073
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 19 September 2026
@islamskietsitaty · 112,670
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 14 August 2026
@iqraskhool · 37,521
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 1 September 2026
@usmankhamys · 57,362
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 23 August 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Напоминание:” (@hushiun), 16,592 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hushiun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.