Channel
@hushman_art
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
838subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001502031104 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hushman_art |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hushman_art |
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 58% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 5 Sept 2026, 04:00 | 838 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 09:34 | 840 | -4 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 844 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:56 | 843 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:47 | 844 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:39 | 844 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
70 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 50 | 71.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 8.57% | |
| 💔 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 4.29% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 2.86% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 70 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интеллект и шершавость Не знаю, что возбуждает меня больше... но все это было на новой выставке во VLADEY, я в восторге! 🍂Как вам женщина из 🍂шершавого поролона, 🍂варварски 🍂выкорчеванного в зоне бикини? 🙌Давайте, разберемся: стереотипное изображение Мерлин Монро или девушки в купальнике — типичный заказ глянцевого журнала, который уже давно валяется на чердаке и от сырости стал выцветать, идя волнами + поролон + b…
❤11🔥1
Арт-тур в Сербию📷😎 Недавно я организовала путешествие по раннехристианским монастырям для учениц онлайн-потока. За три дня была опробована местная кухня, выпито кофе с рахат-лукумом, увиденно 6 монастырей, крепость и сербские бескрайние поля… Теперь я переезжаю в Москву и открываю запись на новый поток: от первобытного искусства до китча. 48 часов с даты публикации поста будет действовать скидка 15% на первые два …
❤8
Photo, posted without a caption
❤🔥6💔3💯3
🍂Кто на этом зарабатывает? В мире искусства труд низкооплачиваем, а арт-рынок — это эмоциональные качели, где ценность во многом измеряется уровнем азарта акционера во время ставок, случайностью и редко логикой. Художники при жизни могли умирать с голоду, а теперь их работы стоят миллионы. И они редко доходят до автора, даже крохи. Йенес Хаанинг предлагает выход, призывая работников с «дерьмовыми условиями» забира…
❤6
Пустой холст — громче денег. Вчера я оставила вас с провокацией Йенса Хаанинга. Давайте разбираться глубже… закатаем рукава ☺️ Пустые полотна — это не отказ от смысла, а провокационное зеркало. Которое задет каверзный вопрос: Что мы сегодня считаем искусством? Художник прислал полотна, но без денег — это делает их не произведениями искусств? Было ли полотно культурно ценнее с деньгами? Если да то почему? Если слож…
❤9
8 млн рублей за два пустых полотна 🍂история художника, который поставил на уши целый музей и дело дошло до суда🤩 Представьте музей современного искусства даёт художнику ~7,8 млн рублей (532 549 датских крон), чтобы повторить две старые инсталляции, где деньги помещаются в раму как отражение среднегодового дохода жителя Австрии и Дании. Художник берёт деньги ииии…… отправляет музею две пустых холста🤩 Ни купюр, ни мо…
❤5🔥5👍2
Доброе утро, дорогие знатоки и интеллектуалы! Как вы думаете сколько может заплатить музей за два пустых холста?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🍂Так жив ли минимализм или все ушла эпоха?! В конце 20в Америка задыхалась от количества рекламы и вещей. Сегодня мы задыхаемся от количества информации: сторис, рилсы, бесконечные уведомления … Главная проблема 2026 года — не переполненный шкаф, а шум в голове. Если в эпоху зарождения минимализма аскетизм был отказом от потреблядства и уж слишком эмоционального абстракционизма, то в “метаминимализме“ мы очищаем …
❤11
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @hushman_art. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Доброе утро, дорогие знатоки и интеллектуалы! Как вы думаете сколько может заплатить музей за два пустых холста?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 29 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“К себе через искусство” (@hushman_art), 838 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hushman_art.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.