Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 圆的窝👩🏼

Channel

圆的窝👩🏼

@huunn6225

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

162subscribers

+122 since we began measuring on 8 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003798421712
TypeChannel
Username@huunn6225
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 31 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 September 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/huunn6225

Growth

401621018 September 2026 — 40 subscribers10 September 2026 — 103 subscribers11 September 2026 — 103 subscribers18 September 2026 — 162 subscribers8 September 202618 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 10 days, net +122. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 22–180 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 12:40162+59
11 Sept 2026, 00:22103no change
10 Sept 2026, 23:58103+63
8 Sept 2026, 15:4740first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 7 September 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
201.7%
avg views ÷ 162 subscribers
Avg views / post
327
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.239%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 September 2026
Posts held18 (7 September 202610 September 2026)
Views total4,901
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Sept 2026, 00:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

3 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
3100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 7 September 2026 to 10 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Sept 2026, 06:30 UTC124 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:DT 【验证时间】:9.9 【妹子花名】:#圆圆 【所在位置】:#西区 【课室环境】:优 【上课学费】:600/p 【颜值打分】:10 【胸器罩杯】:C 【服务内容】:没啥服务,主打情绪价值 【修车详情】: 晚间闲来无事,在外面游荡,忽觉有些寂寞,遂打开飞机,在上面浏览了起来,看见了圆圆,发现是新来的老师,便抱着想工兵的心态去出击一番,虽然频道上已有几位师兄的报告,但是本着没有调查就没有发言权,人的审美和感觉都是很主观的,还是要自行考察过一番才知道。接着打开聊天框和圆圆约了课,没想到这么晚还没睡,想来也是一个小夜猫子,说完具体事宜便抱着忐忑的心态出发了,乘着一丝凉风,到了圆圆的小区,等待一番后便按照圆圆给出的指示找到了房门口,心里带着一丝紧张与好奇,没多久听到拖鞋拍击地面的声音,接着门被推开了,抬起眼望去,便想起了一首诗,北方有佳人,绝世而独立,一顾倾人城,再顾倾人国。被这身姿和容貌

9 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC191 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:Bradley Jimenez 【验证时间】:9.9 【妹子花名】:#圆圆 【所在位置】:#西区 【课室环境】:优 【上课学费】:600 【颜值打分】:9.5 【胸器罩杯】:D 【服务内容】:嫩妹xcz,课表都有 【修车详情】: 先简单总结一句:古灵精怪大波翘臀嫩妹一枚。非常非常活泼开朗热情,话题没断过。真人比照片好看太多啦,古灵精怪中透露着可爱。全身上下纯天然,身材非常顶,漫画里的细枝节硕果,极品奶,小腹有一点点肉,但小腹上的肉才是这身材的点睛之笔!皮肤很滑嫩。69无齿感,妹妹没有丝毫异味。干的时候叫声好听妩媚,过程很听话配合。堪称无敌,迄今为止排名前三的出击体验,100%返修。 【优点缺点】:身材无敌,大波翘臀 【推荐程度】:5颗⭐(总共5⭐) 温馨提示:报告仅供参考 报告提交给机器人: @kaixinjieni_bot (订阅:不迷路) 👇👇👇 香山(珠海/中山)严选群报告

9 Sept 2026, 08:19 UTC224 viewsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:贪生PASS 【验证时间】:9月8日 【妹子花名】:#圆圆 【所在位置】:#石岐 【课室环境】:优 【上课学费】:600P 【颜值打分】:9 【胸器罩杯】:D 【服务内容】:有蛇有69 【修车详情】: 刚好在附近出差,看到有新上的妹子。照片比较真实,不像高P的图。长也好好看 就约上了。遥控上的楼,晚上不太好找,还问了人才找到的,圆圆还下楼接了我。 一见面。好看,确实好看,真人比照片还好看,其实就是不太会拍照。应该是个人老师来的。上楼聊了一会,就一起洗澡了,一脱一衣,哇。。惊艳到了,大胸起码在C-D之间,很挺,抓了一把确实是真的,PP也大大的,当然,肚子上也有点肉肉,不影响。摸着大胸洗完澡。直接把圆圆扑倒在床上,下下其手,没一会,下面就有水流了。好敏感。然后翻身趟来直接口过来。还行虽然不太会口,但也没有齿感。口了一会会,直接戴上安全帽上马。。紧。但又温热多水。看着她一

8 Sept 2026, 17:47 UTC280 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026
Forwarded from @baogaobangbb

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:勇哥 【验证时间】:9.8 【妹子花名】:#圆圆 【所在位置】:#西区 【课室环境】:优 【上课学费】:600 1p 【颜值打分】:10 【胸器罩杯】:C 【服务内容】:老三样 【修车详情】: 妹妹非常白嫩,看着刚成年。前凸后翘的非常诱人,而且说话超好玩 【优点缺点】:非常白嫩没有缺点 【推荐程度】:5颗⭐ 温馨提示:报告仅供参考 报告提交给机器人: @kaixinjieni_bot (订阅:不迷路) 👇👇👇 香山(珠海/中山)严选群报告榜

1

8 Sept 2026, 14:59 UTC381 views1 reactionsread 11 September 2026

👉香山(珠海/中山)严选群👈 【验证留名】:工兵 【验证时间】:9-8 【妹子花名】:#圆圆【别删#字】 【所在位置】:#石岐【别删#字】 【课室环境】:【优】 【上课学费】: 1100 【颜值打分】:【9.5】 【胸器罩杯】:【D】 【服务内容】: 服务太好了 都不催的 【修车详情】: 妹子可爱 ,漂亮 ,典型的的瘦底大波 皮肤嫩滑 谈话愉快动作都愿意配合 房间有一次性床单感觉很干净 非常愉快体验 还会喊爸爸 【优点缺点】:觉得没啥缺点有空再来,硬要说缺点的话就是楼下大门我差点进不来 【推荐程度】:5⭐(总共5⭐) 温馨提示:报告仅供参考 报告提交给机器人: @kaixinjieni_bot (订阅:不迷路) 👇👇👇 香山(珠海/中山)严选群报告榜

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @huunn6225. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“圆的窝👩🏼” (@huunn6225), 162 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/huunn6225.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.