Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 杭州半岛认证区

Channel

杭州半岛认证区

@hz_bandao

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

65,246subscribers

+3,708 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002619659425
TypeChannel
Username@hz_bandao
Description【聊天主群】 @HangZhouBanDao 【广告/老师搜索群】 @bandaonm 【工兵老师车库】 @BanDaofuli 【认证老师车库】 @hz_bandao 【管理机器人】 @xmmnm_bot 【差评投诉】携带 cj 记录和差评报告发送 @hzspa520_bot 【管理联系】 @zatb520 @jiaotou798 主动私聊均为诈骗!!!
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/hz_bandao

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 21 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

61,53865,24663,3926 August 2026 — 61,538 subscribers6 August 2026 — 61,538 subscribers7 August 2026 — 61,642 subscribers8 August 2026 — 61,727 subscribers9 August 2026 — 61,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 61,906 subscribers11 August 2026 — 61,866 subscribers12 August 2026 — 61,907 subscribers14 August 2026 — 62,014 subscribers15 August 2026 — 62,195 subscribers17 August 2026 — 62,363 subscribers18 August 2026 — 62,413 subscribers19 August 2026 — 62,524 subscribers20 August 2026 — 62,625 subscribers21 August 2026 — 62,780 subscribers22 August 2026 — 62,922 subscribers24 August 2026 — 63,094 subscribers25 August 2026 — 63,208 subscribers26 August 2026 — 63,307 subscribers27 August 2026 — 63,433 subscribers28 August 2026 — 63,515 subscribers29 August 2026 — 63,600 subscribers30 August 2026 — 63,680 subscribers31 August 2026 — 63,753 subscribers1 September 2026 — 63,796 subscribers2 September 2026 — 63,861 subscribers4 September 2026 — 64,068 subscribers6 September 2026 — 64,617 subscribers10 September 2026 — 64,915 subscribers12 September 2026 — 64,749 subscribers14 September 2026 — 64,903 subscribers15 September 2026 — 64,984 subscribers17 September 2026 — 65,246 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 42 days, net +3,708. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 60,982–65,802 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 17:4165,246+262
15 Sept 2026, 16:1564,984+81
14 Sept 2026, 02:3764,903+154
12 Sept 2026, 06:2064,749-166
10 Sept 2026, 00:3964,915+298
6 Sept 2026, 18:0264,617+549
4 Sept 2026, 05:5664,068+207
2 Sept 2026, 17:2763,861+65
1 Sept 2026, 15:4363,796+43
31 Aug 2026, 17:4863,753+73
30 Aug 2026, 15:4763,680+80
29 Aug 2026, 13:5463,600+85
28 Aug 2026, 13:4863,515+82
27 Aug 2026, 16:1363,433+126
26 Aug 2026, 13:5463,307+99
25 Aug 2026, 12:2663,208+114
24 Aug 2026, 11:1663,094+172
22 Aug 2026, 19:4362,922+142
21 Aug 2026, 09:0662,780+155
20 Aug 2026, 06:4762,625first reading

Engagement

449 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 105 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.10%
avg views ÷ 65,246 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,370
267 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.06%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
267
of 449 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 127 of 267 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held449 (6 August 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total366,314
Reactions total125
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken26 Sept 2026, 02:37 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,290
Videos
≈667
Links
≈767

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
37m 00s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 312 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

195 reactions across 135 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 89.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤17589.7%
👍42.05%
🍓31.54%
🎉31.54%
🔥31.54%
💯21.03%
🥰21.03%
👏10.513%
💋10.513%
😍10.513%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 229 of the 449 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 195 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 449 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
64
across the posts below
Posts paid on
64
of 449 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @hz_bandao. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 449 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 26 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 02:03 UTC119 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#梦婷 【联系】@dddhh08 【频道】@cavbn2978 【位置】#拱墅 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 #六九 【价格】#900p 1700pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠️防炸通知

26 Sept 2026, 01:01 UTC345 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#洋洋 【联系】@mimi666888ff 【频道】@mimizaihangzhou666 【位置】#上城 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 【价格】#800p 1500pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠️防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 14:31 UTC946 viewsread 26 September 2026
Video

【花名】#Cc杭州92spa4T包射 【联系】@Hzspa518 【位置】#全杭 【标签】#SPA #半套 #丝足 #全裸 #嫩模 #轻度SM #00后 #4T #共浴 #94 #92 【价格】599p #6 报告 1 【商家简介】 #全杭 #SPA #半套 #丝足 #全裸 #嫩模 #轻度SM #00后 #4T #共浴 🤠🥇打造全杭州最顶尖92SPA. 全杭州精品线下实体SPA店 年龄1️⃣8️⃣—-2️⃣8️⃣ 📍上城 📍滨江 📍西湖 📍余杭 📍拱墅 📍下沙 📍临平 📍萧山 📍转塘 🥰👌服务内容⬇️ 全裸场 🉑蛇🉑摸 🉑👅 🉑扣 🐻熊推 👋手推 👠足推 🐬臀推 🍒果冻 🐲毒龙 💦过水 🌹漫游 👅舌滑 🐻胸滑 👋指滑 🧦丝足 🛍服务时间60-80分钟,出水不限次数 联系方式 👍微信:As80808B 😀QQ:87423720…

25 Sept 2026, 14:14 UTC899 viewsread 26 September 2026
Video

【花名】#杭州金莎全裸spa 【联系】@hzjspa 【位置】#全杭 【标签】#半套 #spa #92 #全裸 #4T #5T #线下探店 #高质量 【价格】599-699 【商家简介】 😶😧😬🫤😧😲😩🫡🤫 #杭州 #全裸92 #spa #半套 #4T #5T #线下探店 #高质量 无套路、不办卡、没有隐型消费 💯安全💯稳定💯可靠 金莎杭州SPA八大区嫩妹 全杭州高端泡浴spa 环境高端 酒店式装修 私密空间 私汤泡澡 全场00后愈疗师供您 💰价格:599-699 ⏰营业时间: 13:00~凌晨3点 📍杭州全区域:余杭 西湖 拱墅 上城 滨江 临平 萧山 钱塘 下沙 💋服务内容:100%裸,👋手推,🐻胸推,🐬臀推,💗丝足,🦅阴推,🐍舌吻 , 舔鲍鱼,毒🐲,舔🥚 吸🥚掼🥚,高山流水,梦幻联动,艳舞挑逗,十指弹琴,情趣互动,丝袜制服诱惑❤️各种情趣变装 (时间内不限出水次数) …

25 Sept 2026, 12:37 UTC991 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#蛋黄酥 【联系】@danhuangsu123 【位置】#上城 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 #六九 【价格】#800p 1500pp 【查看报告】工兵报告 1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 12:19 UTC991 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#桐桐 【联系】@tong667 【位置】#拱墅 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 #六九 【价格】#1000p 1800pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠️防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 12:02 UTC966 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#糖果 【联系】@apc136 【频道】@qqppcb 【位置】#上城 【标签】#御姐 #舌吻 #六九 #颜值 颜值嫩御,三个超级好评上榜 【价格】#1000p 2000pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 11:44 UTC414 views0 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#可可 【联系】@h0189 【位置】#拱墅 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 【价格】#900p 1700pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,410 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

Telegram必备的搜索引擎,极搜JISOU帮你精准找到,想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_6334197789

25 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTC≈1,420 views1 reactionsread 25 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#智秀 【联系】@zx1235zx 【频道】@zxzxzx1235 【位置】#萧山 【标签】#御姐 #舌吻 #六九 #巨乳 #颜值 巨乳气质型御姐 【价格】#1200p 2200pp 【查看报告】 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠️防炸通知

🥰1

25 Sept 2026, 02:02 UTC148 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#雅恩 【联系】@yaen334469 【频道】@yaen3344 【位置】#拱墅 【标签】#嫩妹 #舌吻 #六九 【价格】#1200p 2300pp 【查看报告】工兵报告1 2 3 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠防炸通知

25 Sept 2026, 01:04 UTC395 viewsread 25 September 2026
Photo

【花名】#波多野 【联系】@taotaoO89 【位置】#上城 【标签】#御姐 #舌吻 #六九 【价格】#700p 1300pp 【查看报告】1 2 📍群组链接 📍认证频道 📍工兵频道 🗣上榜咨询 ✏投诉建议 ⚠防炸通知

Showing the 12 most recent of 449 posts we hold for @hz_bandao. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@hz_bandao edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
14 August 2026
Most recent edit
14 August 2026

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“杭州半岛认证区” (@hz_bandao), 65,246 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hz_bandao.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.