Channel
@hzxsh_affairs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6,394subscribers
+146 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002131452949 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @hzxsh_affairs |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 14 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/hzxsh_affairs |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 93% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 6,394 | +9 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 07:19 | 6,385 | +17 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 08:56 | 6,368 | +7 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:37 | 6,361 | +2 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 6,359 | +2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 01:19 | 6,357 | +13 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 6,344 | +3 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 01:38 | 6,341 | +29 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 05:56 | 6,312 | +15 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:28 | 6,297 | +26 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:34 | 6,271 | +13 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 16:01 | 6,258 | +8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:16 | 6,250 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 6,248 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 29 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
55 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 47 | 85.5% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 12.7% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.82% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 55 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 29 October 2025 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
最近我们发现工兵过于敷衍，一味只吃优惠，从不锐评。在服务和价格上模棱两可，混淆视听（只打8-9的高分，罚站/服务不到位，机车甚至被包装成刚下海羞涩），从而导致一些不该通过的老师通过了，甚至有些老师刚上榜就收到了普通学员差评。 学生会采用的是完全工兵制的审核验证方式，能不能通过很大程度取决于学员的认知和客观，一味龟男舔狗只会导致质量普遍下降，大家的CJ体验显著降低。 我们学生会不是培养老师的温床，坚持锐评和客观才是王道！管理虽不忍干涉，但还是强势加入了管理审核机制：服务与课表不符、人照差异过大、工兵漂移两次、工兵评估价格偏高 但仍为大趋势下的工兵普遍龟男舔狗所痛心！维护市场人人有责，对于工兵不作为今后也将严肃处理，只吃优惠不锐评，对关键服务和价格评判模棱两可，将直接限制工兵或者直接移除以正视听！！！
❤11
因事务繁多，新增一名管理。 老师和学员有事也可以私聊他 @zZ0089757 群内发送管理也可以找到每位管理的联系方式！！！
杭州学生会作为市场上为数不多的公益群体挡了太多收费群和黑中介的财路了，所以他们常常雇佣或者唆使黑恶分子对我群进行多次攻击。 最近我们发现炸群组织一到半夜就开始发各种恶心视频或者图片，虽然群禁止发送图片和视频并且有学分限制，但是系统拦截偶尔也有延迟。 如遇凌晨0-5点的恶意发送（一般发送不成功，会一直弹机器人提醒），请截图或者保留用户名、ID发送管理处理，可奖励100-200学分！ 如无法妥善处理，将在夜晚暂时关闭群聊！！！
❤6
关于时效问题： 工兵优惠为1天，工兵超过12小时未预约即为作废。18点前只接受当日报名，当日完成并提交报告的优先；18点后开始报名次日，约课时间不得晚于次日同时间，并且报告提交时间最迟不得超过24点。 我们发现在工兵验证过程中，依然有学员主观或者刻意占用兑换名额：一次多兑，或者兑完不约（包括几天后约）甚至兑完约几天后。此类情况直接作废。 活跃学员违反的，第一次可豁免，扣除所有学分予以惩戒，浅活跃或者不活跃都予以直接移除。并上榜前已明确告知老师认证规则，老师未明确拒绝或取消的一切后果由老师承担！ 兑换后未在一天内出报告或者刻意拖延，上榜前已明确告知老师认证规则，老师未明确告知或催促的，就需要另外增加名额直至完成，一切后果由老师承担！增加两次以上就将对该老师予以劝退。
今天起正式废除工兵报名模板，改用群内发送“查询” 转发个人信息至管理，并附过往报告、待出击老师 完成时间默认管理提交时间一日后，不再手动填写 简化模板填写，和学分截图，提高报名效率 数字ID方便追索，老师可在用户名前加 @ 联系！
👎1
最近发现有些老师频道搞什么红包抽奖。 看似福利，疑似骗钱。 友情提醒切勿相信，切勿付款！ 如发现异常请反映至管理先给予下榜！
❤1
重新优化了报告模板，简化了打分选项，基本恢复原来的报告模板 群内发送“报告”体验，后续以此模板为准，工兵或者自助提交报告！
目前群里恶意灌水的现象已有所好转，学分本质是为了鼓励ly之间的分享。学生会每天的积分都有上限，正常交流即可达到。另，恶意灌水后删除自己发言的学分会直接清空，不要存在侥幸心理，这条规则在练功房时代都有，不会更改。
❤1
由于凌晨恶意灌水的较多： 凌晨0-1点将纳入重点监管时间 本月排名前30将纳入重点监管 举报凌晨刷分的奖励100学分！！！
学生会管理团队综合考虑，增加以下玩法： 因月初学员学分较少还在学习中且有部分老师非热门老师，竞拍学分偏少，特对竞拍学分低于3000的老师进行至多两天的轮播奖励
每天推送，详细描写，仍然很多人不知道怎么自助提交工兵报告，教来教去也花费时间 即刻起工兵报告改回直接发送 @hzxsh_bot ，比较遗憾的是无法给工兵报告加分了！
两年多前CJ价格高，我们学生会率先推出工兵模式帮助大家降低成本，就要求你写个报告，跟老师实现共赢而已。 总有一些SB吃了工兵不写报告还故意改名，真幽默！！！
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @hzxsh_affairs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州学生会群务公开” (@hzxsh_affairs), 6,394 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/hzxsh_affairs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.