Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Intimate Writings

Channel

Intimate Writings

@i1895m

Not marked by Telegram, checked 2 September 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

717subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 27 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002193766718
TypeChannel
Username@i1895m
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/i1895m

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

717722719.527 August 2026 — 719 subscribers28 August 2026 — 718 subscribers5 September 2026 — 722 subscribers12 September 2026 — 717 subscribers27 August 202612 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 716–723 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 17:57717-5
5 Sept 2026, 05:16722+4
28 Aug 2026, 14:33718-1
27 Aug 2026, 23:45719first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 24 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

54 reactions across 13 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2342.6%
👍1324.1%
💔611.1%
💯47.41%
35.56%
👏35.56%
🏆11.85%
🔥11.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 54 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 29 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

29 Apr 2025, 23:40 UTC≈3,290 views4 reactionsread 27 August 2026

So sorry it's been a while

31

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

29 Apr 2025, 23:40 UTC≈3,270 views14 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Timeless Beauty Not the kind that flickers in the glass, or lingers in a filtered frame , but the raw pulse beneath the skin, the scar that tells a thousand names. Timeless beauty is the ache of dawn, when night’s shadows bleed into light, the whispered truths in quiet bones, the fight that lingers after fight. It’s not in polished smiles, or lies painted on like fragile masks, but in the cracked and weathered ear

👍65👏3

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

8 Apr 2025, 22:16 UTCviews —

Intimate Writings pinned «https://medium.com/@graceolusanya37/in-my-opinion-c338b2e629c0»

8 Apr 2025, 22:16 UTCviews —

Intimate Writings pinned «https://grayceiy.substack.com For the people using substack, you can follow me here too»

8 Apr 2025, 22:16 UTC≈2,650 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026

https://grayceiy.substack.com For the people using substack, you can follow me here too

2

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

6 Apr 2025, 17:47 UTC≈2,240 views5 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Whatever it is you call success but doesn't make you deny some of the things that you enjoy for the bigger things is also known as "a waste of time" period. Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

👍5

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

5 Apr 2025, 22:08 UTC≈1,750 views7 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

7

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

5 Apr 2025, 22:06 UTC≈1,460 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026
Photo

Where in your heart can I be found? Sometimes I wonder what it took for me to look at you and say I love or like you because at this point all that's written in my heart is PAIN. Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

💔6

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

5 Apr 2025, 20:55 UTC≈1,230 views3 reactionsread 27 August 2026

They say, "take life a step at a time" but what happens during the wait? Like what do we do for "fun" while we wait for the adventures of life to unfold. Do we stay quiet? Or should we explore? I don't know I'm just very curious to know what YOU DO FOR FUN, because for me the wait itself is quite an adventure. Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

2👍1

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

28 Mar 2025, 15:44 UTC≈1,300 views1 reactionsread 27 August 2026

https://medium.com/@graceolusanya37/in-my-opinion-c338b2e629c0

🏆1

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

26 Mar 2025, 02:47 UTC≈2,030 views2 reactionsread 27 August 2026

but course compatibility doesn’t mean heart compatibility. This means alot to me and I'm learning from it so I thought to share. Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

1👍1

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

26 Mar 2025, 02:46 UTC≈2,080 views6 reactionsread 27 August 2026

Classic case of wanting what he can’t have. If a guy only puts in effort when he feels like he’s losing you, that’s not true value—it’s just the thrill of the chase. What's your 2 cents on this? Cheers 🥂 @Grayceiy

💯42

Signed Grayceiy 🗣🔥

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @i1895m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

24 Mar 2025, 15:24 UTCAnonymous Poll85 voters

What next should I write about?

  1. Addiction29%
  2. Relationship42%
  3. Friendship16%
  4. Grief12%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 24 March 2025 to 29 April 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

UPSC - Gaursepadho
@gaursepadho · 32,746
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 5 September 2026
RADHA KRISHNA STATUS
@Suprabhat_Sandesh_morning · 44,086
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 27 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Intimate Writings” (@i1895m), 717 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i1895m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.