"إن ما رقيت بكف يمناك السَّحاب محدٍ على متنه يشيلك للسما.."

Channel
رَيْـق:"
@i1cn7
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,360subscribers
+167 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001235112026 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i1cn7 |
| Description | رَيْـقٌ نـديٌّ على أرجاء الأفئدة هاطل يغمرنـا بالفـرح الفتَّــان الهائـل!🌱 معنىٰ رَيْـق: أوَّل المطَر معنىٰ ريِّـق: رائقٌ حسَنْ وهُنا في فَنني الرَّيِّـق؛ أُشارك ما يرُوق لي ♡ • للفتيات فقط. |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 21 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 2 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i1cn7 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 30 Oct 2026, 04:51 | 7,360 | +7 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:28 | 7,353 | +10 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 08:58 | 7,343 | +14 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 10:16 | 7,329 | +2 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 08:38 | 7,327 | -7 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 04:21 | 7,334 | +41 |
| 5 Oct 2026, 03:39 | 7,293 | +8 |
| 26 Sept 2026, 04:16 | 7,285 | -4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 07:56 | 7,289 | +9 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 7,280 | +8 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 06:42 | 7,272 | +14 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:48 | 7,258 | +22 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 01:39 | 7,236 | +8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 17:45 | 7,228 | +1 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 7,227 | +7 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:35 | 7,220 | +3 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 7,217 | +9 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 7,208 | +6 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:44 | 7,202 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 17:43 | 7,193 | first reading |
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 19.3%
- avg views ÷ 7,360 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,420
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 57 (31 July 2026 – 3 November 2026) |
| Views total | 28,475 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 4 Nov 2026, 01:44 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 691
- Videos
- 26
- Links
- 22
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
«وروحي في السَّماءِ لها شروقٌ تُضيءُ بحلمها وأقول فيها: أنا والله أصلحُ للمَعالي وأمشي مشيتي وأتيه تيهًا 🤍»
#تلاوة_الصباح@i1cn7 🌧️
"صَلُّوا عَلَى خَيْرِ الأَنَامِ وَسَلِّمُوا مَبْعُوثُ حَـقٍّ لِلْعَبِيدِ لِيُسْلِمُوا إنَّ الَّذِي صَلَّى عَلَى خَيْرِ الوَرَى مَغْفُورُ ذَنْبٍ، وَالهُمُومُ سَتُعْدَمُ"
"والحمدُ لله على نعمة المُقرَّبين، الذين نُمرِّر لهم مباهجناالصغيرة فتتكاثر بين أكفِّهم 💛"
َ "حلمٌ تبدى كالضِّيـا يتبسم راقٍ كأرقىٰ ما يرومُ الحالِمُ 🌸 "
❤️🌧️ 1:12:24
"قد عيلَ صبرك والظلماءُ داجيةٌ فاصبرْ قليلًا لعلَّ الصبح ينبلجُ".
اللهمَّ اسلل سخائم قلوبنا:"
[اللهمَّ اسلل سخيمة قلبي]: "هي جزء من دعاء مأثور عن النبي ﷺ، ومعناها: "اللهمَّ انزع من قلبي الغش والغل والحقد والحسد". وقد أوضح الشيخ ابن باز -رحمه الله- أن هذا الدعاء صحيح المعنى ومن الأدعية الجامعة التي ينبغي للمؤمن ذكرها، وأشار الشيخ إلى أن السخيمة هي ما ينشأ من الصدر من سوء.
﴿..وَلا تَجعَل في قُلوبِنا غِلًّا لِلَّذينَ آمَنوا﴾ [الحشر: ١٠] • تفسير السعدي -رحمه الله-
Sticker, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @i1cn7. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 2 posts on @i1cn7 as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 4 November 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 5 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 2
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@thequransave1 · 20,385
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 27 September 2026
@re0r0 · 19,172
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 4 October 2026
@aisha3n · 26,796
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 September 2026
@afkar50 · 30,287
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 8 September 2026
@La_abrah20 · 19,411
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 30 September 2026
@fawzeyah · 48,109
Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 26 August 2026
@waadQuraan · 32,429
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 5 September 2026
@ghymteata · 22,813
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 20 September 2026
@Ghith_quran · 23,188
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 19 September 2026
@rfdalkhayr · 21,606
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 September 2026
@princsh12 · 29,058
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 9 September 2026
@s_1442 · 29,765
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 8 September 2026
@Eshraf_4 · 33,218
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 5 September 2026
@amaall2020 · 19,988
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 October 2026
@Ebrahem_Al_Akhdar · 24,395
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 September 2026
@shifaa_M_roqaiah · 216,105
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
@Dr_1awan · 21,575
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 22 September 2026
@t_1imec · 18,688
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 4 October 2026
@Kunuz_alquran · 22,317
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 24 September 2026
@kaneetat44 · 96,498
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@rawaablog · 44,273
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 28 August 2026
@aitmana1445 · 27,553
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 September 2026
@tajweedhalqh · 83,091
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
@imanidlibi · 47,082
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 6 September 2026
This channel appears in 46 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رَيْـق:"” (@i1cn7), 7,360 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i1cn7.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.