Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 2rude4u

Channel

2rude4u

@i2rude4u

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,939subscribers

-16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001373812778
TypeChannel
Username@i2rude4u
Created31 October 2017measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/i2rude4u

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,9391,9551,9476 August 2026 — 1,955 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,955 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,954 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,952 subscribers25 August 2026 — 1,949 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,948 subscribers31 August 2026 — 1,947 subscribers4 September 2026 — 1,946 subscribers10 September 2026 — 1,942 subscribers13 September 2026 — 1,941 subscribers18 September 2026 — 1,939 subscribers6 August 202618 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 43 days, net -16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,937–1,957 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 08:151,939-2
13 Sept 2026, 18:001,941-1
10 Sept 2026, 03:581,942-4
4 Sept 2026, 15:001,946-1
31 Aug 2026, 16:351,947-1
28 Aug 2026, 15:461,948-1
25 Aug 2026, 23:241,949-3
19 Aug 2026, 03:031,952-2
12 Aug 2026, 11:081,954-1
6 Aug 2026, 08:011,955no change
6 Aug 2026, 07:011,955first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 17 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 5 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
4358.1%
🔥1114.9%
👍68.11%
😁68.11%
🤔68.11%
😭22.70%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 160 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 09:25 UTC213 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Как вам такой кастом для южнокорейской к-поп исполнительницы Karin’ы?

4🤔3😭2😁1

31 Jul 2026, 06:42 UTC481 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Nike продолжают эксперименты с 3D кроссовками и готовит новую модель на базе Air Max Tailwind V в коллаборации с производителем 3D обуви Zellerfeld. Выглядит свежо и интересно, на мой взгляд. А как вам, что думаете?

8🔥6👍2

26 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC643 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

23 года назад Nike представили модель Air Presto Flow. Интересный дизайн, который отсылает к современным моделям молодого швейцарского бегового бренда.

9🔥5😁5🤔1

23 Jul 2026, 21:44 UTC590 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Интересная статистика на ночь глядя. На ЧМ26 выступали 544 игрока в бутсах Nike, adidas 483, 122 в Puma и по мелочи в Sketchers, NB и Under Armour. Больше всех голов забили игроки Nike, а атлеты adidas отдали больше всех результативных передач. Но самое забавное, что главный гол ЧМ26 был забит бутсой Under Armour Shadow Elite 4 Match FG, всего у UA на ЧМ26 было 9 игроков.

11👍4🤔2

23 Jul 2026, 09:38 UTC497 views11 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Этой осенью нас ожидают сразу же 2 модели в легендарной расцветке модели Air Mag из фильма «Назад в будущее». На этот раз дизайнеры перенесли легендарную цветовую комбинацию на модели с теннисным ДНК - ретро-классика Air Tech Challenge II и игровые Vapor 12. Впервые модель Air Mag дебютировала в кино 22 ноября 1989 года и изменила восприятие обуви будущего у нескольких поколений. Оригинальный дизайн кроссовок переизд

11

22 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC≈478 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Друзья, мой небольшой детокс закончился и я снова возвращаюсь к вам рассказывать о кроссовках Nike, бренде и актуальных новостях индустрии. Немного переосмыслил то, что я тут транслирую и решил разнообразить лайфстайлом, таким, как, например, коллекционные вещи для дома, вдохновленные брендом, коих скопилось у меня, за долгие годы увлечения кроссовками, очень много.

18 Jun 2026, 16:20 UTC≈771 views38 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Поздравляю Толю и команду Rassvet с долгожданной коллаборацией с Nike SB. Кажется, обсуждали это ещё в прошлой жизни и вот оно, свершилось!

17 Jun 2026, 05:23 UTC≈1,070 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Похоже, Nike, действительно продает Converse. Пока что это слухи, но офис в Хильвесуме уже полупустой, а финансовые показатели нужно исправлять. Честно говоря, очень жаль, тк для меня лично этот пример владения и управления брендом с сильным херитажем и имиджем был очень хорошим. Не выкачиванием всего, выжиманием соков и хранением бренда в чулане, а гармоничным развитием «младшего брата».

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @i2rude4u. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Осовцов говорит
@osovtsovgovorit · 78,412
Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 21 September 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“2rude4u” (@i2rude4u), 1,939 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i2rude4u.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.