Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ١٤٢٧

Channel

١٤٢٧

@i8bnc

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,612subscribers

-49 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001902218903
TypeChannel
Username@i8bnc
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded23 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/i8bnc

Growth

3,6123,6613,636.523 August 2026 — 3,661 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,661 subscribers24 August 2026 — 3,659 subscribers27 August 2026 — 3,642 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,634 subscribers2 September 2026 — 3,621 subscribers7 September 2026 — 3,612 subscribers23 August 20267 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 15 days, net -49. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,605–3,668 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Sept 2026, 05:543,612-9
2 Sept 2026, 20:243,621-13
30 Aug 2026, 12:463,634-8
27 Aug 2026, 19:243,642-17
24 Aug 2026, 15:543,659-2
23 Aug 2026, 11:003,661no change
23 Aug 2026, 10:453,661first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
29.4%
avg views ÷ 3,612 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,060
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 June 202619 August 2026)
Views total4,254
Reactions total78
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken23 Aug 2026, 11:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

185 reactions across 20 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
185100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 185 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

19 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC554 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‏لو أن الفقد حسّ بحسرتي يوم دمعي سَاح ‏ما حصلت الوسَادة حزنها يسهر على شاني ‏سواد الليل بعيُوني زرع خوف و قطف مصباح ‏تعب عُمري بعد عُمرك يدور له عُمر ثاني

18

15 Aug 2026, 01:19 UTC≈1,220 views24 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‏حبيبي كيف أسولف و أتباهى بك و كيف أبداك ‏و كيف أشعل دجى ليلك أغاني و أرسم الصورة ‏و ليل الشوق لا جابك على بالي بدون إدراك ‏أنا كيف أحتضن صبحك قبل لا تغني طيوره ؟ ‏تفاصيلك سنا وجهك حبيبي ضحكة محياك ‏تفج ليلٍ معيشني تحت ظلمة و دیجوره ‏على مشهاك خذني وين ما ودّك على مشهاك ‏معك تحلى مشاوير العمر و الروح مسرورة ‏أنا عمري بدا من ضحكتك هذي عسى ما أظماك ‏و كوني عقبها واقف و لا هو دار لو دورة ‏و أخاف إن لا سهى بالي يفوت

24

13 Aug 2026, 02:35 UTC≈1,130 views17 reactionsread 23 August 2026

أبطت مراسيلك و حنا ملاهيف على دفى صوتٍ عليه نتشفق إن جيتنا سويت فينا معاريف و إن كان ما تسمح ظروفك .. موفق

17

10 Aug 2026, 23:09 UTC≈1,350 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‏أنت لو تغيب عني و تتركني وحيد ‏والله إن يبطي بي الجرح منك ما برى ‏حافظ حبّك و مخفيه في مجرى الوريد ‏كن ما به عين شافت ولا حي درى

19

6 Aug 2026, 15:50 UTC≈1,800 views23 reactionsread 23 August 2026
Photo

‏فديت إعجابك ‏لو من مده ‏لـ مده ‏صار لي مع جماهير القصايد شريحة ‏و أنا ما كنت أبي من تغريدي سوَى إعجاااابة

23

1 Aug 2026, 04:37 UTC≈2,080 views19 reactionsread 23 August 2026

رمى عهد الحبايب خلفه و قال الجفى قدّام تركني لأمري الواقع ما بين الجرح و ضمَاده بدون أسباب معروفة تناسى سالف الأيام تصاغرني و انا أكبر من حفظ له ملحه و زاده دريت إن القطيعة رغبته و إن الغرام أوهام و أنا اللي كنت أظن الحب حنا سادة أسياده

19

31 Jul 2026, 21:02 UTC≈2,060 views18 reactionsread 23 August 2026

‏كيف لا مرّ السهر من دونك أستعذب نعاسي ؟ ‏و أنت تدري ما لـ عيني من بعد عينك مسرّه ‏ㅤ ‏كل ما طال السكوت بـ سور صدري طال باسي ‏كني اللي راضي التعذيب من قوّ المضره ‏ㅤ ‏والله إني ما تحلويت الجفا لو كنت قاسي ‏« مير قلبي من كثر حبه عجز منك يتشرّه »

18

5 Jul 2026, 01:32 UTC≈3,500 views6 reactionsread 23 August 2026

و هل المدامع على " صوتك يناديني "

6

5 Jul 2026, 01:31 UTC≈3,450 views2 reactionsread 23 August 2026

وقف قبال القمر في كامل وضوحه

2

5 Jul 2026, 01:31 UTC≈3,410 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

إن حال من بيننا هـ البُعد و نزوحه و الحظ عيا على دربك يوديني

1

5 Jul 2026, 01:28 UTC≈3,340 views1 reactionsread 23 August 2026

ملامح الوقت في غيابك شبه ممسوحه ولا الشمس تشرق .. ولا نورك يمسّيني

1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @i8bnc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روايات سكيرهوم
@scarehoome · 47,349
Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 6 September 2026
كتب pdf
@Ea_Books · 56,107
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 23 August 2026
اول متوسط - المنهج السعودي
@mnhaji1m · 29,106
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“١٤٢٧” (@i8bnc), 3,612 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i8bnc.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.