27 measurements spanning 28 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,432–13,580 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
4 Sept 2026, 08:16
13,530
+13
2 Sept 2026, 20:43
13,517
+26
1 Sept 2026, 16:23
13,491
+42
31 Aug 2026, 18:36
13,449
-7
30 Aug 2026, 19:47
13,456
+1
29 Aug 2026, 18:04
13,455
+4
28 Aug 2026, 18:03
13,451
-3
27 Aug 2026, 19:44
13,454
-13
26 Aug 2026, 20:04
13,467
-2
25 Aug 2026, 22:58
13,469
-6
24 Aug 2026, 21:48
13,475
-5
23 Aug 2026, 09:03
13,480
-3
21 Aug 2026, 23:36
13,483
-8
20 Aug 2026, 21:04
13,491
-7
19 Aug 2026, 20:46
13,498
-12
18 Aug 2026, 19:18
13,510
-42
17 Aug 2026, 20:44
13,552
+29
16 Aug 2026, 16:38
13,523
-40
14 Aug 2026, 21:45
13,563
+38
13 Aug 2026, 14:07
13,525
first reading
Engagement
51 posts held, back to 9 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
7.17%
avg views ÷ 13,530 subscribers
Avg views / post
970
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
35
of 51 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 25 of 33 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
51 (9 March 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
32,017
Reactions total
406
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:08 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
37s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
464 reactions across 27 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
304
65.5%
🔥
77
16.6%
😍
24
5.17%
custom 5460631959984160352
22
4.74%
👍
19
4.09%
🤩
10
2.16%
👏
8
1.72%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 51 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 464 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Что для вас особенно важно, чтобы решиться купить коллекцию?
Чтобы модели были носибельными и легко сочетались68%
Чтобы были необычными и эффектными37%
Чтобы подходили для разных размеров35%
Чтобы можно было заменить оригинальную пряжу62%
Чтобы МК был понятен начинающим28%
Чтобы модель можно было связать быстро30%
Чтобы было больше фото, деталей и видео посадки37%
The shares total 297%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какая мужская модель была бы вам интересна в Premium?
Базовый джемпер49%
Кардиган31%
Жилет13%
Футболка или поло34%
Шарф, шарф или манишка15%
Мужские модели мне не интересны13%
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие женские модели вам хотелось бы связать в ближайший сезон?
Базовый джемпер или лонгслив59%
Кардиган52%
Жилет26%
Топ12%
Юбка26%
Брюки или шорты14%
Платье28%
Комплект из двух вещей17%
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤
Поддержим автора
РОЗЫГРЫШ⬇️
🎀МК блуза Тулуза крючком от @knitforspeed
🎀МК представляет собой PDF файл (36 страниц, более 150 фото пошагового процесса, 3 вспомогательных видеоурока, которые находятся в открытом доступе, на канал ВК и YouTube. (Все ссылки на видео находятся в PDF файле описания)
🎀Уровень: новичок
🧶Блуза связана в технике поперечного вязания крючком. Имеет полностью анатомическую посадку:…
Можно купить много МК выгоднее, чем по отдельности69%
В коллекции участвуют любимые мастера34%
The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой формат будущей коллекции вы бы выбрали с наибольшей вероятностью?
Женская сезонная капсула51%
Женские базовые вещи46%
Коллекция с необычными дизайнерскими моделями32%
Одна тема: например, кардиганы или только аксессуары18%
Семейная коллекция: женские, мужские и детские модели20%
Смешанная коллекция: одежда и аксессуары37%
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие категории моделей вам интереснее всего видеть в следующих Premium?
Джемпер и лонгсливы57%
Кардиганы60%
Жилеты26%
Топы20%
Юбки, шорты, брюки25%
Платье27%
Шали, палантины, косынки17%
Сумки и аксессуары30%
Мужские модели19%
Детские модели21%
The shares total 302%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
✨ Давайте вместе соберём будущие выпуски iSweaters.Premium!
В ближайшие два дня мы проведём небольшой опрос: каждый день будет по 4 коротких вопроса. Ваши ответы помогут понять, какие модели, направления и форматы коллекций вам действительно интересны: женские, мужские, детские, базовые или необычные дизайнерские вещи.
Очень хочется, чтобы следующие Premium были не просто красивыми, а именно теми коллекциями, котор…
🎁 Розыгрыш двух вязальных боксов
В боксах — всё для красивого и удобного вязания:
— набор крючков Prym Colour Collection: 2,5–5 мм;
— маркеры для петель;
— напёрсток для вязания;
— блокнот и ручка Family Hobby;
— цветовой круг;
— пряжа Schachenmayr: в каждом боксе — свой оттенок и вид пряжи.
Чтобы участвовать, нажмите кнопку «Участвовать» под этим постом.
✨ Итоги подведём в пятницу в 18:00.
Подарки отправим побе…
custom 546063195998416035214❤10
Showing the 12 most recent of 51 posts we hold for @iSweaters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@iSweaters edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что для вас особенно важно, чтобы решиться купить коллекцию?
Чтобы модели были носибельными и легко сочетались68%
Чтобы были необычными и эффектными37%
Чтобы подходили для разных размеров35%
Чтобы можно было заменить оригинальную пряжу62%
Чтобы МК был понятен начинающим28%
Чтобы модель можно было связать быстро30%
Чтобы было больше фото, деталей и видео посадки37%
The shares total 297%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какая мужская модель была бы вам интересна в Premium?
Базовый джемпер49%
Кардиган31%
Жилет13%
Футболка или поло34%
Шарф, шарф или манишка15%
Мужские модели мне не интересны13%
The shares total 155%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какие женские модели вам хотелось бы связать в ближайший сезон?
Базовый джемпер или лонгслив59%
Кардиган52%
Жилет26%
Топ12%
Юбка26%
Брюки или шорты14%
Платье28%
Комплект из двух вещей17%
The shares total 234%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Можно купить много МК выгоднее, чем по отдельности69%
В коллекции участвуют любимые мастера34%
The shares total 224%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Какой формат будущей коллекции вы бы выбрали с наибольшей вероятностью?
Женская сезонная капсула51%
Женские базовые вещи46%
Коллекция с необычными дизайнерскими моделями32%
Одна тема: например, кардиганы или только аксессуары18%
Семейная коллекция: женские, мужские и детские модели20%
Смешанная коллекция: одежда и аксессуары37%
The shares total 204%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 51 most recent posts we hold, published 9 March 2026 to 2 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@iSweaters named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@mashka_pugacheva named in 4 posts, 13 August 2026 – 16 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Каталог iSweaters” (@iSweaters), 13,530 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/iSweaters.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
