Channel
@i_FELICIDAD
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
11,407subscribers
-364 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001176156872 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_FELICIDAD |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 30 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_FELICIDAD |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 10:56 | 11,407 | -12 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:16 | 11,419 | -19 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 11,438 | -15 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 10:04 | 11,453 | -13 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 11:25 | 11,466 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 11,477 | -9 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 12:35 | 11,486 | -12 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 11,498 | -12 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 18:37 | 11,510 | -8 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 16:26 | 11,518 | -8 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 16:43 | 11,526 | -16 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 19:12 | 11,542 | -8 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 22:06 | 11,550 | -11 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 10:28 | 11,561 | -21 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 11,582 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 11,587 | -8 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 16:33 | 11,595 | -9 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 11,604 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:43 | 11,614 | -23 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:39 | 11,637 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 44 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
504 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 464 | 92.1% | |
| 🕊 | 28 | 5.56% | |
| 🌚 | 12 | 2.38% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 504 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 February 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
هنر فراموش کردن زندگی فکر میکنم یکی از بزرگترین اشتباههایی که بیشتر ما مرتکب میشیم، اینه که خیال میکنیم یه روز بالاخره میرسیم به جایی که بگیم: دیگه کامله... دیگه زندگی همونیه که میخواستم... از بچگی بهمون گفتن اگه درس بخونی، موفق بشی، پول دربیاری، آدم درستی رو پیدا کنی یا به یه جایگاه خوب برسی، بالاخره احساس رضایت میکنی. ولی واقعیت یه چیز دیگهست؛ هر بار به یکی از این هدفها میرسیم، خیلی زود یه هدف جدید جاش…
❤30
تلهی «ای کاش» نشخوار اینکه «اگر فلان تصمیم رو گرفته بودم، الان فلانجا بودم»، فقط یه بازی روانیه که مغز برای شکنجهی خودت طراحی کرده. واقعیت اینه اون نسخه از تو که فلان تصمیم رو گرفت، الان وجود نداره. تو همینی هستی که الان هستی؛ پس انرژیت رو برای «اینجا و الان» خرج کن! ؛ ───────── #نصیحت_امشب 🥁 ؛ ✨𝐅𝐄𝐋𝐈𝐂𝐈𝐃𝐀𝐃
❤39🕊3
در نهایت فهمیدم مشکل از من نیست. مشکل از اینه که من دارم زندگی واقعی خودمو با تریلر تبلیغاتی زندگی بقیه مقایسه میکنم. یعنی اگه زندگی واقعی آدمها فیلم بود، اینستاگرام فقط پوسترشه؛ اون هم با فیلتر، نورپردازی و دروغهای کوچک اما خوشرنگ. 😌
❤46🌚1
زندگی مردم اونجا خیلی مرتبه. اتاقاشون مرتبه، لباساشون مرتبه، حتی غصه خوردنشون هم خیلی شیکه. اونوقت من اگر بلند شم آب بخورم، وسط راه یادم میره چرا بلند شدم، بعد میشینم، بعد دوباره تشنه میشم.
❤32🕊4
قبل از اینستا فکر میکردم قیافهم کاملاً قابل استفادهست. ولی بعد از یه دور اکسپلور، حس میکنم صورتم نسخه آزمایشی بوده و بقیه نسخه پریمیومن. همه یه زاویه فک دارن که باهاش میشه هندونه قاچ کرد. من جلوی آینه فقط میپرسم: «ببخشید ما با کدوم دوربین باید خوب بیفتیم؟»
❤31🌚6
قبل از باز کردن اینستا زندگیم کاملاً نرمال بود. چای داشتم، یه گوشه نشسته بودم، زندگیم هم داشت خیلی محترمانه جلو میرفت. ده دقیقه توی اینستا میچرخم… یهو مغزم میگه: «ببین بقیه کجان، تو کجایی.» در حالی که من اصلاً یادم نمیاد با کسی مسابقه ثبتنام کرده باشم!
❤36
نت که وصل میشه، انگار وارد یه سیاره دیگه میشی. سیارهای که توش همه خوشگلن، همه پوستشون برق میزنه، همه هم یه جوری بیدار میشن که انگار از اول صبح آهنگ انگیزشی توی مغزشون پخش میشه. منم همون لحظه با موهای سیخ و چشمهای نیمهباز میگم: «ببخشید… ما واقعاً همسیارهای هستیم؟»
❤28
#سوال_امشب اولین باری که واقعاً احساس کردی بزرگ شدی، کی بود؟ توی دایرکت یا بات بفرستید☺️
❤6🕊2
اگه اسم این انیمه رو میدونی تو دوست خوب منی!
❤23🕊11
سلام فیلی های عزیزم وصلین؟
❤101🌚2
فیلی های عزیز مراقب خودتون باشید
❤29🕊6
Sticker, posted without a caption
❤8
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @i_FELICIDAD. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“◝فـیلیسداد🍕 𝐟𝐞𝐥𝐢𝐜𝐢𝐝𝐚𝐝◟” (@i_FELICIDAD), 11,407 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_FELICIDAD.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.