📎 @i_cfs

Channel
𝐂𝐅𝐒
@i_cfs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
46,553subscribers
-3,369 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001853404302 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @i_cfs |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 34 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/i_cfs |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Oct 2026, 20:19 | 46,553 | -316 |
| 27 Sept 2026, 09:41 | 46,869 | -498 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:20 | 47,367 | -106 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:17 | 47,473 | -62 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:36 | 47,535 | -102 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 02:15 | 47,637 | -142 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 18:20 | 47,779 | -202 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 08:00 | 47,981 | -125 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 00:15 | 48,106 | -75 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 15:58 | 48,181 | -74 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 12:36 | 48,255 | -63 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 48,318 | -76 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:04 | 48,394 | -57 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 48,451 | -73 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:08 | 48,524 | -59 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:58 | 48,583 | -52 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 48,635 | -88 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:34 | 48,723 | -54 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:14 | 48,777 | -121 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:08 | 48,898 | first reading |
Engagement
1,331 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 148 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.01%
- avg views ÷ 46,553 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 471
- 614 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 614
- of 1,331 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 1,331 (6 August 2026 – 6 October 2026) |
| Views total | 289,347 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Oct 2026, 07:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈3,510
- Videos
- ≈13
- Links
- ≈25
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 October 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 1m 10s
- Average length
- 23s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
دیگران من را فرد ساکتی می بینند؛درحالی که ذهنم پر از انبوه فریادهاست...🙂 @i_cfs
بزن رو تخما ارضا شی اوف 🍑
بزن رو تخما تا وارد بهشت بشی 🍑 🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚🥚
🖤 @i_cfs
𝑯𝒂𝒑𝒑𝒊𝒏𝒆𝒔𝒔 𝒊𝒔 𝒏𝒐𝒕 𝒕𝒉𝒆 𝒂𝒃𝒔𝒆𝒏𝒄𝒆 𝒐𝒇 𝒑𝒓𝒐𝒃𝒍𝒆𝒎𝒔 خوشبختی به معنی نبود مشکلات نیست @i_cfs
کصت مو داره؟
- نه با ترفندهای اینجا شیو کردم دیگه درنمیاد25%
- آره گاییدههه75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
اگه واژنت بوی پنیر کپک زده میده و تیره شده و روت نمیشه به دوست پسرت نود بدی یا قرار بزاری و جلوش لخت شی؟ خب این ک کاری نداره با یه ترفند ساده حل میشه آموزشش رو ببین @Cutegirl
𝘐𝘯 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘣𝘭𝘪𝘯𝘬 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯 𝘦𝘺𝘦 𝘦𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘺𝘰𝘯𝘦 𝘪𝘴 𝘨𝘰𝘯𝘦 چشم بهم بزنی همه رفتن @i_cfs
🩷 @i_cfs
آلت تناسلی مردان در حالت نرمال چند سانت است؟ 5 8 13 17 21 مشاهده پاسخ
🏳️🌈 لواط چگونه به وجود آمد؟؟ اولین همجنس گرایان تاریخ؟؟ قوم لوط چه کسانی بودند؟؟ سرنوشت اولین لواط کاران تاریخ ؟؟ همه و همه رو میتونید از اینجا بخوانید و ببینید👇 https://t.me/+a9iqwXpjjzY4NWFk
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,331 posts we hold for @i_cfs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 16 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
کصت مو داره؟
- نه با ترفندهای اینجا شیو کردم دیگه درنمیاد25%
- آره گاییدههه75%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
با گیفاش جق زدی؟
- آره چسبید🤤💦0%
- نه الان میزنم🍆0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
آب کصت در اومد ؟
- هوووف پاک نکن منم جوین بشم 🥰0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بلدی خوشگل برقصی؟؟؟
- آره بابا رقصم عالیه0%
- نه فقط بلدم یه تکونی به خودم بدم0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کصت مو داره؟
- نه با ترفندهای اینجا شیو کردم دیگه درنمیاد43%
- آره گاییدههه57%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
کصت مو داره؟
- نه با ترفندهای اینجا شیو کردم دیگه درنمیاد38%
- آره گاییدههه63%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 20 August 2026 to 6 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@Music_Bshgahi · 66,88810 postsفاک کلاس | Fuck Class
@fuckclass · 2,7929 postsx
@cutegirl · 4907 postsبلایندیت مجازی
@blaindate · 1,1476 postsمحافظ کانال جوک وحشی
@jok_vahshi · 5,1476 postsتگ
@khoshhali_frooshi1 · 1266 postsموزیک
@ReMiXTaiM · 7,4916 postsپخش آرایشی خواجوی
@arayeshi · 9805 postsClassical Music
@music · 91,9625 postsسکسی جگر
@StickerLokhti · 65 postsprompt 🤖 AI News
@prompt · 13,1604 postsهایده ومهستی
@Hayde_Mahstii · 2533 postsMuzikam
@muzikam · 273,0543 posts-TwitHow 🔥
@TwitHot · 63 postsانگیزشی کنکور
@angize_konkoor · 12 postsدانشــ🎓ــجو
@Daneshjoo · 354,3842 postsDownloader +
@MyDLPlusBot · 79,1252 postsPERFUME (ОРИГИНАЛ)
@perfume · 10,0912 postsپروکسی ملی | 𝗣𝗥𝗢𝗫𝗬 𝗧𝗘𝗟
@proxy_teIegram · 305,6092 postsproxystarlink
@proxystarlink · 3162 posts🎻احسان نیزن🎻
@ehsanneyzan · 2,4521 postانرژی مثبت++
@NRJIHA · 98,7281 postپلی لیست بازگشت
@pleylistam · 31 postshixonshop.2024
@shixonshop · 11 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 21
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 21
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@i_cfs named 21 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 5 posts, 13 August 2026 – 16 September 2026
named in 4 posts, 16 August 2026 – 4 October 2026
named in 4 posts, 19 August 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 3 posts, 18 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 15 August 2026 – 14 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 6 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 9 August 2026 – 3 September 2026
named in 2 posts, 13 August 2026 – 19 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 1 post, 2 October 2026 – 2 October 2026
named in 1 post, 26 September 2026 – 26 September 2026
named in 1 post, 24 September 2026 – 24 September 2026
named in 1 post, 16 September 2026 – 16 September 2026
named in 1 post, 14 September 2026 – 14 September 2026
named in 1 post, 11 September 2026 – 11 September 2026
named in 1 post, 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
named in 1 post, 10 August 2026 – 10 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐂𝐅𝐒” (@i_cfs), 46,553 subscribers as measured 4 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/i_cfs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.